Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. If you dare criticize Jimmy Lake, you won't last long.

The Daily AOC

1235712

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,839
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.

    But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.

    But we're making assupmptions

    JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
    Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.

    This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.


    Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.

    Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid?
    MikeDamoneGrundleStiltzkinUW_Doog_BotRaceBannonTurdBomberSoutherndawg
  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    edited March 13

    2001400ex said:

    You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.

    But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.

    Still waiting for that list of instances where finance companies were held liable for pipeline spills....


    You really need to learn when to surrender vs doubling down.

    Dimwit
    I love when he shoves his head up his ass all while calling everyone else ignorant. It takes a special level of Kuntiness to do that.
    MikeDamoneCuntWaffle
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Posts: 6,954
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    edited March 13
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sound reasoning. If I crash my car into school bus full of kids they should sue the bank that lent me the money to by the car, not me.

    And that is what we call textbook strawman.
    Only if you're a fucking moron is that an example of a strawman. It's a direct parallel to what AOC is calling for. Wells Fargo should be held liable for an oil spill because they lent money to pipeline builder.
    Just close all banks and the problem is solved. In the AOC jungle gym.
    MikeDamone
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Posts: 6,954
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    Called it, gibberish.
    Why am I not surprised that you think banking regulations are gibberish.
    So far out of your element here. Stick to what you know: Burgers.
    MikeDamoneRaceBannonSoutherndawg
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Posts: 34,017
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    Ultimately, I don't think AOC is looking for legal or legislative action here. Progressives have been trying to attack businesses and industries by naming & shaming their chickenshit financial services providers. For example:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/jpmorgan-cfo-lake-says-bank-has-cut-exposure-to-gun-industry
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-10/bofa-will-no-longer-lend-to-some-gunmakers-vice-chairman-says
    Sledog
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Posts: 6,954
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    SFGbob said:

    Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.

    Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.

    So when the 3rd party idiot puts a hole in the pipeline when he is doing unauthorized digging, you immediately call your lawyer and file a lawsuit against the Bank that lent you the money to build the pipeline correct?

    That's the way I hear it is done from Social Justice Warriors.
    You should also go after the bank holding the mortgage of the third party idiot for loaning him the money to get a house and therefore have the chance to be a third party idiot
    Why stop there? Keep suing all the way to the Trump White House, because everything is actually Trump's fault, eventually.
    MikeDamonePitchfork51Sledog
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Posts: 6,954
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    jecornel said:

    Maybe we should send an invite to AOC to provide a business 101 class. She made drinks one time and talked to drunk people.

    Now she is screaming and yelling at CEO's.

    I would put her resume against any of yours!

    Did you know she was a community organizer once? What have you done?!!! That's what I thought!!

    The greatest irony is how privileged AOC actually is by being cute and having enormous tits. If she's smaller than a C-Cup, she's still serving drinks in Brooklyn.
    MikeDamonePitchfork51pawzsalemcoog
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 41,922
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.

    But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.

    But we're making assupmptions

    JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
    Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.

    This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.


    Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.

    Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid?
    More people voted but still

    Let's see your studies
    MikeDamonePitchfork51
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Posts: 6,954
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    edited March 13
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.

    But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.

    But we're making assupmptions

    JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
    Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.

    This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.


    Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.

    Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid?
    Link?
    MikeDamoneRaceBannonGrundleStiltzkinUSMChawk
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Posts: 13,969
    10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    That's what I thought

    Nothing
    So you don't want to read.
    I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.
    I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.

    Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
    It ain't quite that simple. There's processes and procedures and management rep letters and all sorts of shit to preclude that from happening. You have to be a total fuckwad CPA firm to get caught with your pants down that far.

    BTW, every CPA firm also has E&O insurance in place for the occasional fuck up even with all those checks in place.

    #PCAOB superiority guy



    GrundleStiltzkinRaceBannonUW_Doog_Botpawz
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Posts: 14,903
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    That's what I thought

    Nothing
    So you don't want to read.
    I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.
    I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.

    Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
    It ain't quite that simple. There's processes and procedures and management rep letters and all sorts of shit to preclude that from happening. You have to be a total fuckwad CPA firm to get caught with your pants down that far.

    BTW, every CPA firm also has E&O insurance in place for the occasional fuck up even with all those checks in place.

    #PCAOB superiority guy



    Arthur Andersen was said fuckwad CPA firm.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Posts: 34,017
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    That's what I thought

    Nothing
    So you don't want to read.
    I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.
    I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.

    Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
    It ain't quite that simple. There's processes and procedures and management rep letters and all sorts of shit to preclude that from happening. You have to be a total fuckwad CPA firm to get caught with your pants down that far.

    BTW, every CPA firm also has E&O insurance in place for the occasional fuck up even with all those checks in place.

    #PCAOB superiority guy



    It happens (Enron, Countrywide, Siemens, big one in Japan over a decade ago), but major accountancy liability cases are rare, and getting rarer.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Posts: 34,017
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    That's what I thought

    Nothing
    So you don't want to read.
    I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.
    I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.

    Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
    It ain't quite that simple. There's processes and procedures and management rep letters and all sorts of shit to preclude that from happening. You have to be a total fuckwad CPA firm to get caught with your pants down that far.

    BTW, every CPA firm also has E&O insurance in place for the occasional fuck up even with all those checks in place.

    #PCAOB superiority guy



    Arthur Andersen was said fuckwad CPA firm.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    jecornel said:

    So a business person gets a loan to open a restaurant and he/she/they kitchen has a fire, burns down a business next store. The bank providing the loan should be required to pay for clean up and remodel?

    Am I tracking correctly?

    You are correct sir. It's right there in those Banking regulations Hondo posted. Can't you read?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Posts: 13,969
    10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes
    edited March 13

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    That's what I thought

    Nothing
    So you don't want to read.
    I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.
    I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.

    Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
    It ain't quite that simple. There's processes and procedures and management rep letters and all sorts of shit to preclude that from happening. You have to be a total fuckwad CPA firm to get caught with your pants down that far.

    BTW, every CPA firm also has E&O insurance in place for the occasional fuck up even with all those checks in place.

    #PCAOB superiority guy



    Arthur Andersen was said fuckwad CPA firm.
    Pre-SOX

    It ain't the old days. Your shit better not stink as a CPA firm and the wall of independence best be in place between the client and the firm.

    HondoFS knows this shit. He's just trolling for bucks. Same old same old.


    GrundleStiltzkinMikeDamone
  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    edited March 13

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    Called it, gibberish.
    Why am I not surprised that you think banking regulations are gibberish.
    So far out of your element here. Stick to what you know: Burgers.
    And cocksucking, don't forget the cocksucking.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Posts: 6,954
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    Called it, gibberish.
    Why am I not surprised that you think banking regulations are gibberish.
    So far out of your element here. Stick to what you know: Burgers.
    And cocksuck, don't forget the cocksucking.
    Don't fag out the thread yet. That's Hondo's job.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Posts: 13,969
    10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!

    Bump

    Tell us more
    https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html
    That's what I thought

    Nothing
    So you don't want to read.
    I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.
    I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.

    Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
    It ain't quite that simple. There's processes and procedures and management rep letters and all sorts of shit to preclude that from happening. You have to be a total fuckwad CPA firm to get caught with your pants down that far.

    BTW, every CPA firm also has E&O insurance in place for the occasional fuck up even with all those checks in place.

    #PCAOB superiority guy



    It happens (Enron, Countrywide, Siemens, big one in Japan over a decade ago), but major accountancy liability cases are rare, and getting rarer.
    Truth. SEC has locked this shit down. And getting lockier every day.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.

    But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.

    But we're making assupmptions

    JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
    Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.

    This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.


    Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.

    Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid?
    First of all the claim was that voters were turned away on account of their skin color, but I'd love to see your "studies" Hondo, and maybe you should think about sharing them with the Washington Post because they gave Hillary's claims 4 Pinocchio's.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/06/hillary-clintons-claims-about-voter-suppression-georgia-wisconsin/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d214d1b36a1c

    They talk all about your "studies" Hondo.
Sign In or Register to comment.