So no one wants her fired? What she said is awful, why no calls for her head?
Being a bigot and a racist isn't against the law Hondo. If it were you'd be in chains for you beliefs about skin color and birth control. Let her voters decide her fate.
So no one wants her fired? What she said is awful, why no calls for her head?
Being a bigot and a racist isn't against the law Hondo. If it were you'd be in chains for you beliefs about skin color and birth control. Let her voters decide her fate.
So now you are being charitable. Interesting. A dude posts in either a blackface or white hood in the 80s and you want him removed from office. But now a D uses the N word and you are good with it?
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
It's a tabloid for communists. Democrat means the same thing these days. HTH
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
It's a tabloid for communists. Democrat means the same thing these days. HTH
I'm not going to say this was funny or upvote it, but it's at least in the same galaxy as an actual joke
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
It's a tabloid for communists. Democrat means the same thing these days. HTH
I'm not going to say this was funny or upvote it, but it's at least in the same galaxy as an actual joke
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
... by saying it was basically a tabloid for Democrats? um sure
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
So no one wants her fired? What she said is awful, why no calls for her head?
Being a bigot and a racist isn't against the law Hondo. If it were you'd be in chains for you beliefs about skin color and birth control. Let her voters decide her fate.
So now you are being charitable. Interesting. A dude posts in either a blackface or white hood in the 80s and you want him removed from office. But now a D uses the N word and you are good with it?
Find a quote from me where I said I wanted him removed from office you lying worthless piece of shit. I said the exact opposite. I wanted him to stay in office, and I told you exactly that at the time. Which makes you what Hondo? You're a fucking pathological liar Hondo.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
I pointed to a thread that shows you to be a lying piece of shit. I never called for Northam to resign and you're a fucking liar Hondo.
There's no hypocrisy on my part. My position on Northam is exactly the same as on this woman. Of course you having the integrity of a fucking sewer Rat have nothing say about the fact you lied your ass off.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
It's a tabloid for communists. Democrat means the same thing these days. HTH
I'm not going to say this was funny or upvote it, but it's at least in the same galaxy as an actual joke
Who's joking! If you don't know that you're too far around the bend, comrade.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
Oh Hondo...
Oh you don't like the question?
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
Oh Hondo...
Oh you don't like the question?
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
I sincerely give credit to the HuffPo for writing that about a liberal. They usually seem to look the other way for those with the "D" next to their name.
This is a trope that hasnt been true for probably a decade
Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in 2008.
Huffington Post's bias was always overstated. People acted like it was the Nation or something, but it was closer to a tabloid for Democrats.
You miss the point. It started turning hard progressive about a decade ago.
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
Oh Hondo...
Oh you don't like the question?
No, I don't care your question, nor the issue that much. Mariot said HuffPo turned away from "looking the other way" on Dem misdeeds a decade ago, as if to say HuffPo became less strident. I don't know how much HuffPo ignores now or then, but the site was started with help from Andrew Breitbart in 2004-05 as more left-of-centerish answer to Drudge. Greg Gutfeld was still writing there in mid-2008. Other conservatives or libertarians wrote there in that time too, but I don't remember who. My point is that HuffPo turned harder left about 10-11 years ago, as Adriana's politics turned harder left. It didn't moderate, just the opposite. If you take that as railing, that's on you.
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Yeah you know more about their history than I do. I have never been to their website, just some of their columns come up in my feed and they are never ones negative about Democrats. I read some of the articles, some are awful.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
Comments
But why do you rail on a news source with a progressive tilt not say anything about a news source with a conservative tilt?
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/56786/appears-the-the-blackface-wearing-gov-is-going-to-survive#latest
Hondo your word on any topic outside of your love of sucking dick is worthless.
There's no hypocrisy on my part. My position on Northam is exactly the same as on this woman. Of course you having the integrity of a fucking sewer Rat have nothing say about the fact you lied your ass off.
As a "policy stance," for lack of a better term, I really don't care much about any media outlet's ideological or partisan bent. The important thing is to recognize all media sources and all individual journalists have a point of view.
Well each side plays to their respective base in the media. You might not agree with this, but Conservatives generally want to read more opinionated writing and liberals general want to read more factual based writing (I'm not meaning truth, as you can lie with facts, more meaning the writing style). Especially news sources like Vox, which is liberal but everything is written in a factual context. But you read daily caller and it's more from an emotional context.
That's why it's important to read both sides.