Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Right. Because settlements are never about money.
That very well might be the absolute dumbest thing I've ever heard the Dazzler say, and I've seen some real doozies from him.
Not only does Dazzler hold the mantle of worst lawyer ever, but he's fighting tooth and nail to keep it.
Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
If Dazzler didn't get negative attention, he'd get none at all.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Right. Because settlements are never about money.
That very well might be the absolute dumbest thing I've ever heard the Dazzler say, and I've seen some real doozies from him.
Not only does Dazzler hold the mantle of worst lawyer ever, but he's fighting tooth and nail to keep it.
Settlements are usually about money, Miss. You should read more carefully.
Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
You sound pour.
The IRS doesn’t think so.
Your EITC says so, though.
Sick burn!
Meh, not even a burn. A fact.
But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
You sound pour.
The IRS doesn’t think so.
Your EITC says so, though.
Sick burn!
Meh, not even a burn. A fact.
But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.
That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.
I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.
Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
2 defendants settled out
LIPO
You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
Pressing.
Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
You sound pour.
The IRS doesn’t think so.
Your EITC says so, though.
Sick burn!
Meh, not even a burn. A fact.
But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.
Comments
LIPO
That very well might be the absolute dumbest thing I've ever heard the Dazzler say, and I've seen some real doozies from him.
Not only does Dazzler hold the mantle of worst lawyer ever, but he's fighting tooth and nail to keep it.
Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
Just like he experienced in HS, College and Life.
Just for all the wrong reasons, some of which involved small animals.
But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.
Sad to see you so helpless, but it is what it is.