Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Covington student sues Washington Post for $250 million

1…6781012

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,656 Standard Supporter
    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,656 Standard Supporter
    Telling the truth about you isn't pressing. Your statement is a moral judgment. You have chosen many government undertakings. You pay for them. I haven't. I'm happy to admit that is a moral judgment. You just lie.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Telling the truth about you isn't pressing. Your statement is a moral judgment. You have chosen many government undertakings. You pay for them. I haven't. I'm happy to admit that is a moral judgment. You just lie.

    So taxes are a moral issue for you. And apparently, so is everything else.

    What a bore.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah, the dazzler thinks that his taxes are to low and that this is a moral issue. But he won't pay more taxes unless he is forced to by law backed up by a gun. Definitely a profiles in courage moment.

    Weird. It doesn’t matter how many times I tell Gasbag that taxes aren’t a moral issue for me, he repeats that they are.

    Lying—it’s the new moral courage!
    As an accomplished liar, you should know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Right. Because settlements are never about money.

    That very well might be the absolute dumbest thing I've ever heard the Dazzler say, and I've seen some real doozies from him.

    Not only does Dazzler hold the mantle of worst lawyer ever, but he's fighting tooth and nail to keep it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    The IRS doesn’t think so.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    The IRS doesn’t think so.
    Your EITC says so, though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    If Dazzler didn't get negative attention, he'd get none at all.

    Just like he experienced in HS, College and Life.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    The IRS doesn’t think so.
    Your EITC says so, though.
    Sick burn!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
    Yeah. I'm anxious. Idiot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Right. Because settlements are never about money.

    That very well might be the absolute dumbest thing I've ever heard the Dazzler say, and I've seen some real doozies from him.

    Not only does Dazzler hold the mantle of worst lawyer ever, but he's fighting tooth and nail to keep it.
    Settlements are usually about money, Miss. You should read more carefully.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    Dazzler used to run home to Mommy and complain he'd been beaten up again, which, to Dazzler, was a sign of his popularity.

    Just for all the wrong reasons, some of which involved small animals.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    The IRS doesn’t think so.
    Your EITC says so, though.
    Sick burn!
    Meh, not even a burn. A fact.

    But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.

    Sad to see you so helpless, but it is what it is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    TurdBomber said:

    Dazzler used to run home to Mommy and complain he'd been beaten up again, which, to Dazzler, was a sign of his popularity.

    Just for all the wrong reasons, some of which involved small animals.

    Have you always been this well adjusted?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
    Yeah. I'm anxious. Idiot.
    You are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    The IRS doesn’t think so.
    Your EITC says so, though.
    Sick burn!
    Meh, not even a burn. A fact.

    But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.

    Sad to see you so helpless, but it is what it is.
    Too wordy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
    Yeah. I'm anxious. Idiot.
    You are.
    You're embarrassing. JFC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Anyone else notice how the Dazzler has now posted dozens of responses all since the news came out exposing him as both liar and moron and not a single one of his posts acknowledges that he had his head up his ass.

    That's some form of cowardice Dazzler.

    I said I was surprised, ma’am. You know, like you were when Michael Brown’s parents got $1.5 million.
    But I wasn't surprised that the city's insurances paid Brown's parents. Why are you such a fucking liar Dazzler? The thing that really wasn't surprising is that once again you put your head up your ass and lack the integrity to admit you were wrong, and are now lying about it.
    Madam, why are you haranguing me? My prediction was on the board for all to see. I was surprised the WaPo would settle it for any price. I can speculate why they did, but we’ll never know.
    You claimed he didn't even have a case and that it would be dismissed on Summary Judgment. After CNN settled you lied and claimed you had only made your prediction about the WaPo. You've now performed your usual jackass dance and continued to lie which is what you usually do when it's been shown that you put your head up your ass.

    Soon enough you'll start lying and claim you never said he didn't have a case.
    Legally, his case was terrible from everything we know. But we don’t know what they paid and we don’t know how embarrassing the email traffic in the newsroom may have been—after all, we agree the WaPo is liberal and elitist, don’t we? I doubt exposure to a judgment had very much to do with the willingness to settle.
    Take the L and move on. You're just making yourself look dumber, which is hard to do.
    2 defendants settled out

    LIPO
    You were wrong. Bigly. This went exactly as I said it would.

    Seriously. You should have just ignored this thread this week and moved on. Embarrassing as hell for you.
    Seems you wouldn’t be this anxious about your “big win” if you were confident in your position.
    Yeah. I'm anxious. Idiot.
    You are.
    You're embarrassing. JFC
    Obviously
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Yeah. The dazzler has often said that his taxes are too low. That certainly isn't a moral judgment. The politicians he votes for state that raising taxes is a moral obligation if not a patriotic duty. But, again, that isn't a moral judgment.

    Pressing.

    Taxes are about arithmetic and practicality. What do we need to collect and finance in order to pay for what we’ve chosen to undertake? And who has that money, the poor and lower middle class, or the rich and upper middle class?
    You sound pour.
    The IRS doesn’t think so.
    Your EITC says so, though.
    Sick burn!
    Meh, not even a burn. A fact.

    But neither matters, as your Compulsive Tick will compel a response to the absolute tiniest, most innocuous comment.

    Sad to see you so helpless, but it is what it is.
    Too wordy.
    Things Shitty Lawyers say for $1000, Alex.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter