Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The "system" that is making the poor, poorer in America

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
Poverty: The Welfare Effect

This is important, because much of our welfare efforts go toward bolstering consumption, not incomes. Adjusting official income levels for what people consume, rather than what they earn, yields a very different poverty rate: 2.8%, according to the AEI report. Almost nonexistent.

How can that be? An officially poor family of four has income of about $25,000 or less. That's not much. But that measure fails to take into account taxes. The poor mostly don't pay taxes. In fact, many get money back through the Earned Income Tax Credit and other income-support programs. Food stamps, housing support and other aid likewise enable officially poor households to boost their incomes, in most cases significantly.

The fact is, when the very same households that the federal government considers to be poor are questioned, they report roughly $2.40 in spending for every $1 of income that Census says they have. So that family of four earning $25,000 is likely consuming as much as $60,000 a year in goods and services.


How Much Do Poor Consume?

Heritage Foundation poverty analysts Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield in a 2016 data report noted that "poor" in America doesn't mean what it means elsewhere. Based on a 2009 government survey of spending, the average poor person in the U.S., for instance, lives in a bigger house than the average nonpoor person in France, Germany or England. Moreover, nearly 85% of poor homes in the U.S. have air conditioning, and nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite TV. Half own computers, and 43% have internet access. More than half own a video game system.

The "system" appears to be making them better off than they'd be without the "system."
«1345

Comments

  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    2001400ex said:

    photo workout1_zpsaaevsz1c.gif

    everytim hondo posts a picture or gif:


  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    SFGbob said:

    Poverty: The Welfare Effect

    This is important, because much of our welfare efforts go toward bolstering consumption, not incomes. Adjusting official income levels for what people consume, rather than what they earn, yields a very different poverty rate: 2.8%, according to the AEI report. Almost nonexistent.

    How can that be? An officially poor family of four has income of about $25,000 or less. That's not much. But that measure fails to take into account taxes. The poor mostly don't pay taxes. In fact, many get money back through the Earned Income Tax Credit and other income-support programs. Food stamps, housing support and other aid likewise enable officially poor households to boost their incomes, in most cases significantly.

    The fact is, when the very same households that the federal government considers to be poor are questioned, they report roughly $2.40 in spending for every $1 of income that Census says they have. So that family of four earning $25,000 is likely consuming as much as $60,000 a year in goods and services.


    How Much Do Poor Consume?

    Heritage Foundation poverty analysts Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield in a 2016 data report noted that "poor" in America doesn't mean what it means elsewhere. Based on a 2009 government survey of spending, the average poor person in the U.S., for instance, lives in a bigger house than the average nonpoor person in France, Germany or England. Moreover, nearly 85% of poor homes in the U.S. have air conditioning, and nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite TV. Half own computers, and 43% have internet access. More than half own a video game system.

    The "system" appears to be making them better off than they'd be without the "system."

    Isn't that the point of having a "system"? You wanted them to be worse off?

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Poverty: The Welfare Effect

    This is important, because much of our welfare efforts go toward bolstering consumption, not incomes. Adjusting official income levels for what people consume, rather than what they earn, yields a very different poverty rate: 2.8%, according to the AEI report. Almost nonexistent.

    How can that be? An officially poor family of four has income of about $25,000 or less. That's not much. But that measure fails to take into account taxes. The poor mostly don't pay taxes. In fact, many get money back through the Earned Income Tax Credit and other income-support programs. Food stamps, housing support and other aid likewise enable officially poor households to boost their incomes, in most cases significantly.

    The fact is, when the very same households that the federal government considers to be poor are questioned, they report roughly $2.40 in spending for every $1 of income that Census says they have. So that family of four earning $25,000 is likely consuming as much as $60,000 a year in goods and services.


    How Much Do Poor Consume?

    Heritage Foundation poverty analysts Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield in a 2016 data report noted that "poor" in America doesn't mean what it means elsewhere. Based on a 2009 government survey of spending, the average poor person in the U.S., for instance, lives in a bigger house than the average nonpoor person in France, Germany or England. Moreover, nearly 85% of poor homes in the U.S. have air conditioning, and nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite TV. Half own computers, and 43% have internet access. More than half own a video game system.

    The "system" appears to be making them better off than they'd be without the "system."

    I just got a chance to read this. First. Got a link for context?

    Second, you are now comparing to Europe. Why don't you do the same with health Care?

    That being said, there's no way a family making $25k a year is spending $60k a year.

    And I never said anything about the poor people in America compared to poor people in other countries. The poor here are better off and I said as much. That doesn't mean the system isn't setup to keep them down. The earned income credit is another vehicle for that.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Okay Hondo, how does the EITC keep people down? Cue the Kunt act.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203

    SFGbob said:

    Poverty: The Welfare Effect

    This is important, because much of our welfare efforts go toward bolstering consumption, not incomes. Adjusting official income levels for what people consume, rather than what they earn, yields a very different poverty rate: 2.8%, according to the AEI report. Almost nonexistent.

    How can that be? An officially poor family of four has income of about $25,000 or less. That's not much. But that measure fails to take into account taxes. The poor mostly don't pay taxes. In fact, many get money back through the Earned Income Tax Credit and other income-support programs. Food stamps, housing support and other aid likewise enable officially poor households to boost their incomes, in most cases significantly.

    The fact is, when the very same households that the federal government considers to be poor are questioned, they report roughly $2.40 in spending for every $1 of income that Census says they have. So that family of four earning $25,000 is likely consuming as much as $60,000 a year in goods and services.


    How Much Do Poor Consume?

    Heritage Foundation poverty analysts Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield in a 2016 data report noted that "poor" in America doesn't mean what it means elsewhere. Based on a 2009 government survey of spending, the average poor person in the U.S., for instance, lives in a bigger house than the average nonpoor person in France, Germany or England. Moreover, nearly 85% of poor homes in the U.S. have air conditioning, and nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite TV. Half own computers, and 43% have internet access. More than half own a video game system.

    The "system" appears to be making them better off than they'd be without the "system."

    Isn't that the point of having a "system"? You wanted them to be worse off?

    I did? Was that in the thread where you said you enjoyed Hondo's ass tonguings?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Okay Hondo, how does the EITC keep people down? Cue the Kunt act.

    Provide a link shit dick.

    Well the EIC ends in the $30k income range and the peak amount is in the $15k range. I know many people who are dead set to earn income at that level to maximize their EIC. I tell them it's a fucktarded mindset but they listen about as well as you do.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    So the earned income tax credit gives people who already pay no income tax more money then they would of had and that keeps them down. Got it. Another good reveal is that Hondo knows a lot of lazy poor people.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Why are you scared to provide a link to your source material?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Not afraid at all, are you challenging the accuracy of what was stated?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Not afraid at all, are you challenging the accuracy of what was stated?

    Yes. I did challenge accuracy. Now post the link.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    photo workout1_zpsaaevsz1c.gif

    How’s is reading comprehension?
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Poverty: The Welfare Effect

    This is important, because much of our welfare efforts go toward bolstering consumption, not incomes. Adjusting official income levels for what people consume, rather than what they earn, yields a very different poverty rate: 2.8%, according to the AEI report. Almost nonexistent.

    How can that be? An officially poor family of four has income of about $25,000 or less. That's not much. But that measure fails to take into account taxes. The poor mostly don't pay taxes. In fact, many get money back through the Earned Income Tax Credit and other income-support programs. Food stamps, housing support and other aid likewise enable officially poor households to boost their incomes, in most cases significantly.

    The fact is, when the very same households that the federal government considers to be poor are questioned, they report roughly $2.40 in spending for every $1 of income that Census says they have. So that family of four earning $25,000 is likely consuming as much as $60,000 a year in goods and services.


    How Much Do Poor Consume?

    Heritage Foundation poverty analysts Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield in a 2016 data report noted that "poor" in America doesn't mean what it means elsewhere. Based on a 2009 government survey of spending, the average poor person in the U.S., for instance, lives in a bigger house than the average nonpoor person in France, Germany or England. Moreover, nearly 85% of poor homes in the U.S. have air conditioning, and nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite TV. Half own computers, and 43% have internet access. More than half own a video game system.

    The "system" appears to be making them better off than they'd be without the "system."

    Isn't that the point of having a "system"? You wanted them to be worse off?

    I did? Was that in the thread where you said you enjoyed Hondo's ass tonguings?
    Your reading comprehension sucks
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Maybe you could quote for me where I said I want poor people to be worse off.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    SFGbob said:

    Maybe you could quote for me where I said I want poor people to be worse off.

    Maybe you could understand that's not what my point was, if you had reading comprehension.

    The "system" appears to be making them better off than they'd be without the "system."


    Of course the welfare system is making people better off than they'd be without the welfare system. That's the point. What point are you possibly making by pointing out the obvious?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    edited November 2018
    That Hondo is full of shit when he claims the "system" makes poor people poorer. Was it really that tough to follow along in this thread?

    Gosh it was only the title of the thread.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:
    Ah this one. Yes I mean to get back to this.

    See you can provide a link. It's an opinion article in the politics section. That being said. I still disagree that the average person making $25k spends $60k. That's not even close to reality. They spend more than they make, but no way it's $60k.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    That being said. I still disagree that the average person making $25k spends $60k. That's not even close to reality.

    And this is the very same worthless piece of shit who's favorite dodge is to accuse the other person of having poor reading comprehension.
  • USMChawkUSMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:
    Ah this one. Yes I mean to get back to this.

    See you can provide a link. It's an opinion article in the politics section. That being said. I still disagree that the average person making $25k spends $60k. That's not even close to reality. They spend more than they make, but no way it's $60k.
    Yet that number was reported by the poor themselves.

    The fact is, when the very same households that the federal government considers to be poor are questioned, they report roughly $2.40 in spending for every $1 of income that Census says they have. So that family of four earning $25,000 is likely consuming as much as $60,000 a year in goods and services.

    If you click on the source material for that article (linked below) you’ll see a great analysis of how the poverty line is determined by income level, only, and does not account for the increased welfare benefits. That is the entire argument about an income level based poverty line vs a consumption based poverty line. The latter accounts for the social benefits they receive as is a truer indicator of their overall situation.

    https://www.aei.org/publication/annual-report-on-us-consumption-poverty-2017/
Sign In or Register to comment.