Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football (front page article as it was)
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER.
He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then .
Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-Puppylove
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER.
He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then .
Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-Puppylove
Comments
Potato
Chris Fetters, caminhou, em seguida, saltou da prancha Husky imediatamente após a 'perda' em 'Auburn. Ele escreveu uma peça claramente dramática e ignorante na primeira página do site dawgman.com, apressadamente para visualizações de página imediatamente após o jogo, alegando que os Huskies e, em grau semelhante, as chances do Pac 12 em fazer o Playoff de Futebol da Faculdade, são essencialmente SOBRE!!!! Sim, ele disse isso.
Ele deve saber que o título nacional, em qualquer época (AP / Treinadores, bcs, playoff) nunca foi decidido em 01 de setembro. SEMPRE.
Ele é responsável agora por um argumento cansado e preguiçoso, apenas reiterando a narrativa amigável à SEC, paga pela ESPN, estabelecida por todos a oeste da majestosa Cordilheira das Montanhas Rochosas. Quando chega a hora de a comissão escolher as equipes em dezembro, a UW venceu mesmo perdendo. Este é um time de futebol muito bom e eles sabem disso. Todos eles assistiram. Não se preocupe com os dawgfans, como Puppylove assumiu e postou no Hardcore Husky no sábado à noite, a AP reconheceria os esforços da UW. Eles deixaram apenas alguns pontos para o número 9 no país, e não para os 25 primeiros em que Chris Fetters levou seus leitores da Dawgman a acreditar.
Todo mundo vai perder, mas o Alabama, talvez Clemson. Se a UW cuida dos negócios no pac12, por mais desafiador que seja, eles são uma referência para o playoff. O Fetters parecia indicar o contrário, porque queria criar page views por meio de controvérsias fabricadas. Não vai ajudar. Fetters e eu voltamos muito, e Pup sempre limpa o chão com seus pontos de vista ignorantes sobre o futebol Husky e o futebol universitário em geral. É claro que tudo o que ele tinha que fazer era acertar o botão de banimento toda vez que eu tivesse uma opinião divergente, como todo mundo que dawgman fez ao longo dos anos, o que gerou o HardcoreHusky.
Apesar da opinião de Fetters, este jogo não é um referendo no pac12. É exatamente o oposto. Inaptidão de Cincinnati e Arizona certamente não ajudou o pac 12, mas é uma temporada longa, e UCLA vai ficar muito melhor com DTR no QB .. Um monte de futebol ainda para ser jogado. O USC, Stanford e, em menor medida, o Utah também estão muito em playoffs e não tem nada a ver com o UW LOSS (uma vitória aos meus olhos, na estrada com o comitê e outros que entendem o futebol universitário).
O ACC é claramente a pior conferência do futebol, uma liga de 1 equipe. Se Clemson tropeçar na conferência, o que eles têm uma propensão significativa a fazer (se você seguiu o futebol da faculdade por mais de 10 anos) eles estão prontos e NÃO Washington e o pac12. O ACC não tem um Stanford, USC, UTAH ou Oregon (tinha patos decidiu jogar alguém) este ano. Eles não têm ninguém. Estado da Flórida, o # 2 da ACC foi fortemente queimado por uma equipe ACC estripada e muito comum na Virginia Tech. Uma equipe a par com dizer Washington St ou Arizona St.
A USC e a Stanford ainda disputam grandes jogos. Stanford tem um lance legítimo no playoff mesmo com a perda do pac12 cedo. Apenas bata ND, UW. USC está em mesmo com perda no texas. Basta executar a tabela, bater ND. Utah ... administrem a mesa em que estão. Portanto, não é tão terrível quanto o Sr. Fetters nos levou a acreditar. Certamente ajudaria a todos se a USC vencesse o Texas, mas um grande pedido com um jovem de 18 anos na qb.
Texas e Oklahoma estão pegando o pac12 na hora certa. O USC e o UCLA estão começando a ser verdadeiros calouros no QB, respectivamente (se Chip Kelly for com Thompson-Robinson), o T-R será um ótimo QB. Realmente ele é o cara. O comitê entende isso. Eles percebem que o ACC é um depósito de lixo, e o pac 12, com JT Daniels, da USC, e Dorian Thompson-Robinson, da UCLA, ainda são melhores que FSU e VT com quem quer que sejam, incluindo François. O USC, o 4º melhor time do pac12 na mente de Puppy, ainda é melhor do que o segundo, terceiro e quarto do ACC .....
Então, grilhões, o pac12 está longe de terminar o playoff na semana 1. É tudo sobre o timing das perdas de outras equipes, e para quem eles perdem.
E Jude? Você é irrelevante nesta cidade. Ted Miller, que era decente na melhor das hipóteses, ainda era o dobro do repórter que você é. Rasteje sua casa de crack em Tacoma no Hill Top e realmente cubra uma prática Husky. E com suas credenciais, na verdade, cobrir um jogo com o conhecimento dos jogadores, os seus # 's, alturas, pesos, etc .. quanto tempo você espera fugir com essa coisa de futebol husky? Seu desrespeito flagrante e desconsideração do protocolo de ferimento de Chris Petersen não foi duplicado desde a época de Don James, há mais de 30 anos. É por isso que os treinadores da UW não confiam no Seattle Times. Don James foi queimado por um repórter presunçoso e desrespeitoso como você a respeito de um determinado QB e um júri então.
Pegue um bow punk, a mídia fez um círculo completo, e você é o culpado. Como Jim Acosta, da CNN, espero que Petersen não chame durante presser como Sarah Sanders não acosta ... Eu certamente não ...!
-Amor de cachorrinho
走了，然后走了，然后在'奥本''失去'之后立即从赫斯基板上跳下来。他写的网站dawgman.com匆匆的比赛结束后立即页面访问量的第一页上明确戏剧性和无知片，声称哈士奇，和类似的程度，吃豆12在使高校足球季后赛的机会，基本上是关于!!!!是的，他这么说。
他应该知道9月1日从未决定任何赛季的全国冠军（AP /教练，篮球，季后赛）。 EVER。
他现在负责一个疲惫而懒散的争论，只是重申美国证券交易委员会友好的付费ESPN故事，由雄伟的落基山脉以西的每个人设定。当委员会在12月份选择球队时，UW甚至输了。这是一支非常优秀的足球队，他们知道这一点。他们都看着了。不要担心这些人，因为Puppylove在周六晚上接管并发布在Hardcore Husky上，AP会承认UW的努力。他们在这个国家的第9名留下了几个积分，而不是Chris Fetters让他的Dawgman读者相信的前25个积分。
每个人都会失败，但阿拉巴马州，也许是克莱姆森。如果UW负责pac12交易，无论多么具有挑战性，它们都是季后赛的基准。 Fetters似乎表明相反，因为它想通过捏造的争议创建页面浏览量。它无济于事。 Fetters和我回来了很多，Pup总是以他对赫斯基足球和大学橄榄球的无知观点来清理场地。当然，每次我都有不同的意见时，他所要做的就是点击禁令按钮，就像多年来dawgman所做的其他人一样，它产生了HardcoreHusky。
尽管Fetters的观点，这场比赛不是对pac12的公投。恰恰相反。残疾辛辛那提和亚利桑那州肯定没有帮助小精灵12，但它是一个漫长的赛季，加州大学洛杉矶分校将得到更好的使用DTR在QB ..很多足球仍然播放。南加州大学，斯坦福大学，并在较小程度上，犹他也是在季后赛中非常多，无关与UW LOSS（与委员会和其他人谁了解大学生足球的道路上我眼中的胜利）。
ACC显然是最糟糕的足球会议，是一支由1支球队组成的联盟。如果在这次会议上，他们有显著倾向做（如果您是大学橄榄球超过10年）克莱姆森蹒跚，他们准备NO华盛顿和pac12。该ACC没有斯坦福大学，南加州大学，俄勒冈州或者犹他（鸭决定玩一）今年。他们没有人。佛罗里达州立大学的ACC＃2被弗吉尼亚理工大学的ACC队伍和非常普通的队伍严重烧伤。工作人员与华盛顿街或亚利桑那州街相提并论
南加州大学和斯坦福大学仍在打出精彩的比赛。尽管早期的pac12失利，斯坦福仍有合法的季后赛席位。刚敲ND，UW。南加州大学甚至在德克萨斯州遭遇损失。只需运行表格，点击ND即可。犹他......管理他们所在的桌子。所以它并不像费特斯先生让我们相信的那么可怕。如果南加州大学击败德克萨斯州，那肯定会对每个人都有所帮助，但对于一个18岁的qb大订单来说肯定会有所帮助。
德克萨斯州和俄克拉荷马州正按时获得pac12。南加州大学和加州大学洛杉矶分校分别在QB开始成为真正的新生（如果Chip Kelly与Thompson-Robinson合作），T-R将是一个伟大的QB。他真的是那个人。委员会理解这一点。他们意识到ACC是一个垃圾场，与USC的JT丹尼尔斯和加州大学洛杉矶分校的多里安汤普森 - 罗宾逊一起，Pac 12仍然比包括弗朗索瓦在内的任何人都要优于FSU和VT。 USC是Puppy心目中第四好的pac12球队，仍然优于ACC的第二，第三和第四......
因此，在第一周，pac12远未完成季后赛。这完全取决于其他球队的失利时间，以及他们输给谁。
还有裘德？你在这个城市无关紧要。最好的Ted Miller仍然是你的两倍。在山顶上的塔科马（Tacoma）爬上你的裂缝回家，真正涵盖赫斯基的做法。凭借你的凭据，实际上用玩家的知识，你的＃，高度，重量等来覆盖游戏。你期望这个哈士奇足球的东西能逃脱多久？自30多年前唐·詹姆斯时代以来，他公然不尊重和无视克里斯彼得森的伤病协议并未加倍。这就是为什么华盛顿大学的教练不信任西雅图时报。唐·詹姆斯被一个冒犯和不尊重的记者焚烧，就像你关于某个QB和陪审团一样。
拿一个朋克弓，媒体整整一圈，你应该受到责备。就像来自美国有线电视新闻网的吉姆·阿科斯塔一样，我希望彼得森不要在压力过程中打电话，因为萨拉桑德斯没有睡觉......我当然不会......！
- 宝贝爱