Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
I wonder why the majority wants guns and minority’s don’t. Hmm. It’s definitely about freedom. Not at all that white people have used violence against minority’s as a way to eliminate, hold back and control them for this countries entire existence.
Not sure if you have heard but things are different these days and guns had something to do with it
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
Last month, hip-hop artist Killer Mike used an interview conducted by the National Rifle Association’s media arm, NRATV, to advocate for black gun ownership, chiding members of his community for being “lackeys” of the white gun-control movement. The interview prompted fierce social media blowback. Many argued that Killer Mike’s words merely served as fodder for the NRA’s attempt to undermine the youth-led March for Our Lives.
Days later, Killer Mike issued a two-part video apology on Twitter. The NRA “used the interview to disparage a very noble campaign that I support. My interview was supposed to be something that continued a conversation,” he clarified, “a conversation about African American gun ownership in these times. We have to remember in our allyship [with whites] that we still have to make sure there are certain rights and demands that we make for us and our community. … I support the march and black people owning guns.”
Although the controversy surrounding Killer Mike’s interview and apology received significant publicity, few have properly situated it in the history of white supremacy and gun policy. From the earliest days of the American colonies, gun laws have aimed to arm whites and disarm people of color and indigenous people, part of the quest to maintain white supremacy. People of color and indigenous people have long fought against this double standard, recognizing that gun ownership can be integral to securing equality — especially in a country where white gun ownership is valorized and protected.
From the earliest days of European colonization, gun laws served as a proxy for regulating and containing people of color and indigenous people. In 1647, “The Laws and Liberties of Massachusetts” banned any man from repairing “any gun, small or great, belonging to any Indian. … Nor shall sell or give to any Indian, directly or indirectly any such gun, or any gun-powder, shot or lead, or shotmould, or any militarie weapons or armour.” Punishment entailed a fine of 10 pounds or, absent that, corporal punishment.
Connecticut replicated this statute almost word for word in 1650. Ten years later, Connecticut officials declared that “Negroes” and “Indians” were exempt from serving in the militia, which for practical purposes meant they could not possess firearms.
From the earliest days of European colonization, gun laws served as a proxy for regulating and containing people of color and indigenous people. In 1647, “The Laws and Liberties of Massachusetts” banned any man from repairing “any gun, small or great, belonging to any Indian. … Nor shall sell or give to any Indian, directly or indirectly any such gun, or any gun-powder, shot or lead, or shotmould, or any militarie weapons or armour.” Punishment entailed a fine of 10 pounds or, absent that, corporal punishment.
Connecticut replicated this statute almost word for word in 1650. Ten years later, Connecticut officials declared that “Negroes” and “Indians” were exempt from serving in the militia, which for practical purposes meant they could not possess firearms.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
I didn't post the chart. Hth.
Ok. Explain the relevance of that chart since you are defending the position.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
I didn't post the chart. Hth.
Ok. Explain the relevance of that chart since you are defending the position.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
I didn't post the chart. Hth.
Ok. Explain the relevance of that chart since you are defending the position.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
It’s called context you stupid fuck. It’s the same reason people talk about Hillary and Barry when discussing Trump’s policies and administration.
It shows the population that believes in gun ownership is declining (as a percentage) and the population that believes in gun control is growing (as a percentage); it’s a significant statistic that breaks along ethnicity.
Freedom knows which side to be on and which side to oppose at this point in history. Your side is the enemy of freedom, the enemy of the founders' ideals, and it's going down in flames one way or another. I'll say it again, clean your own house before it gets cleaned for you. Your side in its current form won't be permitted to rule and destroy the nation.
Unfortunately it's pretty much inevitable that they eventually win. The future Americans don't like freedom. The Dems understand this and it's why keeping the border open is one of their main priorities. California once voted for Ronald Reagan lol.
First, ISAFNRC.
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Go fuck yourself if you think a chart showing facts is racist.
The first chart shows whites not being a majority in the future. Explain why you included that.
It’s called context you stupid fuck. It’s the same reason people talk about Hillary and Barry when discussing Trump’s policies and administration.
It shows the population that believes in gun ownership is declining (as a percentage) and the population that believes in gun control is growing (as a percentage); it’s a significant statistic that breaks along ethnicity.
People talk about Hillary and Obama while defending Trump cause they ain't got nothing. And their heads are up Trump's ass. Those charts are meaningless (for reasons I've stated) and the future ethnicity in our country is meaningless.
Comments
That being said, Da fuq kind of poll asks "protect gun rights" and "control gun ownership" as two choices. As if they are mutually exclusive.
Last month, hip-hop artist Killer Mike used an interview conducted by the National Rifle Association’s media arm, NRATV, to advocate for black gun ownership, chiding members of his community for being “lackeys” of the white gun-control movement. The interview prompted fierce social media blowback. Many argued that Killer Mike’s words merely served as fodder for the NRA’s attempt to undermine the youth-led March for Our Lives.
Days later, Killer Mike issued a two-part video apology on Twitter. The NRA “used the interview to disparage a very noble campaign that I support. My interview was supposed to be something that continued a conversation,” he clarified, “a conversation about African American gun ownership in these times. We have to remember in our allyship [with whites] that we still have to make sure there are certain rights and demands that we make for us and our community. … I support the march and black people owning guns.”
Although the controversy surrounding Killer Mike’s interview and apology received significant publicity, few have properly situated it in the history of white supremacy and gun policy. From the earliest days of the American colonies, gun laws have aimed to arm whites and disarm people of color and indigenous people, part of the quest to maintain white supremacy. People of color and indigenous people have long fought against this double standard, recognizing that gun ownership can be integral to securing equality — especially in a country where white gun ownership is valorized and protected.
Connecticut replicated this statute almost word for word in 1650. Ten years later, Connecticut officials declared that “Negroes” and “Indians” were exempt from serving in the militia, which for practical purposes meant they could not possess firearms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_demography
I guess you can take it up with Harvard if you really want to pursue this injustice
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/political-demography-how-population-changes-are-reshaping-international-security-and
It shows the population that believes in gun ownership is declining (as a percentage) and the population that believes in gun control is growing (as a percentage); it’s a significant statistic that breaks along ethnicity.
But if gun control scares you then so be it.