Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
"Punching Up" in California and New Mexico
Comments
-
okay so a bunch of poor miserable people traipsing through the desert carrying ladders and ropes and explosives.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Do you not see that the degree of difficulty is about a million times more?
And if they start blowing shit up it wont be hard to find and stop them.
Many will not attempt it. The ones that do now only have limited routes which can be monitored much more easily.
You can't be this fucking dense.
Just come out and say it. It's mean and a symbol of racism and you'll lose points with your friends if you admit that it will do somehting. -
Americans have the right to determine if they want large scale demographic changes or not. Call that racist if you will, I don't really give a fuck because I know it isn't. Latinos are the majority now in several states. I guarantee most Americans are against further massive immigration from Latin America. Not because we're racist, but because we want America to stay American. Even the great divider himself said this:
"When I see Mexican flags waved at pro-immigration demonstrations, I sometimes feel a flush of patriotic resentment. When I'm forced to use a translator to communicate with the guy fixing my car, I feel a certain frustration."
I mean fuck, it hardly looks like America anymore in some towns and cities. Looks like Mexico, El Salvador or Venezuela. Gotta press fucking 1 on the phone just to hear English instead of Spanish. And people don't want that socialist mentality folks bring with them from those failed countries. Our so called 'leaders' forced this situation on us. Only we can change that, they aren't going to do shit about it. The United States of Latin America is not what we signed up for. Stop the flow. Stop the shitshow. -
Sounds like you are scared of dark skinned people. Both Muslim and Latino.oregonblitzkrieg said:Americans have the right to determine if they want large scale demographic changes or not. Call that racist if you will, I don't really give a fuck because I know it isn't. Latinos are the majority now in several states. I guarantee most Americans are against further massive immigration from Latin America. Not because we're racist, but because we want America to stay American. I mean fuck, it hardly looks like America anymore in some towns and cities. Looks like Mexico, El Salvador or Venezuela. Gotta press fucking 1 on the phone just to hear English instead of Spanish. And people don't want that socialist mentality folks bring with them from those failed countries. Our so called 'leaders' forced this situation on us. Only we can change that, they aren't going to do shit about it. The United States of Latin America is not what we signed up for. Stop the flow. Stop the shitshow. -
Sounds like you're a thick headed dumbass.2001400ex said:
Sounds like you are scared of dark skinned people. Both Muslim and Latino.oregonblitzkrieg said:Americans have the right to determine if they want large scale demographic changes or not. Call that racist if you will, I don't really give a fuck because I know it isn't. Latinos are the majority now in several states. I guarantee most Americans are against further massive immigration from Latin America. Not because we're racist, but because we want America to stay American. I mean fuck, it hardly looks like America anymore in some towns and cities. Looks like Mexico, El Salvador or Venezuela. Gotta press fucking 1 on the phone just to hear English instead of Spanish. And people don't want that socialist mentality folks bring with them from those failed countries. Our so called 'leaders' forced this situation on us. Only we can change that, they aren't going to do shit about it. The United States of Latin America is not what we signed up for. Stop the flow. Stop the shitshow. -
Since all those Hispanics can now vote it will make Kali a bigger 3rd world shithole.
-
If the government fails to act or the open borders establishment finds a way to block the voters' will as represented by Trump's immigration policies, call a convention of states to bypass those impotent fags and amend the Constitution to stop the destructive immigration path this country is on. I say amend it either way, our leaders cannot be trusted, nor can they be allowed to easily reverse the proposed immigration changes every time a new party takes power.
-
2001400ex said:
The right controls both houses of Congress and presidency. How exactly is the left doing anything? Really it's absurd how those on the right get people like you riled up about an issue. Then don't do anything about it. And con people like you. Thinking they actually will do something about it and it's the lefts fault for it not happening.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Before you respond with where I know you are going. Keep in mind that Congress just approved an increase to the military for $80 billion. They could easily get $20 billion through for the wall.
This is Congress. They clock in and make it appear like they are on opposite sides.
But their paychecks come from the same corporation(s).
-
No. It’s outdated and ineffective. You think some immigrant family is gonna risk everything, but then give up simply because there is a bigger wall?Pitchfork51 said:
okay so a bunch of poor miserable people traipsing through the desert carrying ladders and ropes and explosives.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Do you not see that the degree of difficulty is about a million times more?
And if they start blowing shit up it wont be hard to find and stop them.
Many will not attempt it. The ones that do now only have limited routes which can be monitored much more easily.
You can't be this fucking dense.
Just come out and say it. It's mean and a symbol of racism and you'll lose points with your friends if you admit that it will do somehting. -
You think the lock on your door is gonna stop a determined home invader? El oh el.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it. -
Nope. Thank REAL GOD for the 2nd Amendment.ThomasFremont said:
You think the lock on your door is gonna stop a determined home invader? El oh el.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
