"Punching Up" in California and New Mexico
Comments
-
Yah sure, that's it. Let ICE do its job and deport these motherfuckers. I don't give a fuck about their feelings or the hurt feelings of the demwits who support this lawlessness. Fuck them. Congress needs to do its job or get fucked.2001400ex said:All the while OBK seems to think we don't have any border security and doesn't realize the majority of illegals entered the country legally.
-
Pee-Ewww. Another bad-to-worse performance, Cirrho.CirrhosisDawg said:
Will you move to Russia if the wall doesn’t get built? Back it up if you are so confident. Wall gets built or you self deport to trump’s paradise and his hero Vladimir.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Will you move to Mexico if the wall gets built. You claim it isn't going to happen. How confident are you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Is that what you read?oregonblitzkrieg said:
are you insinuating the wall will cost more than $1 trillion?CirrhosisDawg said:
$1.025 trillion of financing through tariffs?oregonblitzkrieg said:Someone else said it, use the Chinese tariffs to pay for the wall. Use the remainder to pay down the national debt.
Sounds legit.
MAGA!
Learn to quit while you're behind.
-
Got to hand it to Mexico, taking their land back without a shot fired. Who would have thought all they had to do was out procreate...
Genius... -
greenblood said:
Got to hand it to Mexico, taking their land back without a shot fired. Who would have thought all they had to do was out procreate...
Genius...
And getting paid to do it. -
Our politicians have committed treason against the people, selling out America to Latin America like this. Hopefully the 2018 and 2020 elections will remove these treasonous pigs from office.
-
That's one of the big reasons I will not register as a Dem. Fucking clueless faggots on this issueoregonblitzkrieg said:
The United States of Latin America will look like a Caracas slum in 30 years if the open borders establishment isn't removed from power permanently.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Arizona and Texas are next.
-
The Dems take all browns and blacks for granted. They don't realize how fast those folks flip when they start making money and acquiring property.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
That's one of the big reasons I will not register as a Dem. Fucking clueless faggots on this issueoregonblitzkrieg said:
The United States of Latin America will look like a Caracas slum in 30 years if the open borders establishment isn't removed from power permanently.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Arizona and Texas are next.
-
Funny. According to you, if we implement universal healthcare we will devolve into a shitty communist country, but if we borrow border policies from actual communist countries we will be unchanged. It’s almost like you’re completely full of shit.oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's a conclusion Hondo would reach. You know better than that.allpurpleallgold said:So when we implement China’s immigration policies will we become a communist country?
-
You’re better than that FreemieThomasFremont said:
Funny. According to you, if we implement universal healthcare we will devolve into a shitty communist country, but if we borrow border policies from actual communist countries we will be unchanged. It’s almost like you’re completely full of shit.oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's a conclusion Hondo would reach. You know better than that.allpurpleallgold said:So when we implement China’s immigration policies will we become a communist country?
-
Disagree.GrundleStiltzkin said:
You’re better than that FreemieThomasFremont said:
Funny. According to you, if we implement universal healthcare we will devolve into a shitty communist country, but if we borrow border policies from actual communist countries we will be unchanged. It’s almost like you’re completely full of shit.oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's a conclusion Hondo would reach. You know better than that.allpurpleallgold said:So when we implement China’s immigration policies will we become a communist country?
-
"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
-
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!" -
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
-
The right controls both houses of Congress and presidency. How exactly is the left doing anything? Really it's absurd how those on the right get people like you riled up about an issue. Then don't do anything about it. And con people like you. Thinking they actually will do something about it and it's the lefts fault for it not happening.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Before you respond with where I know you are going. Keep in mind that Congress just approved an increase to the military for $80 billion. They could easily get $20 billion through for the wall. -
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it. -
Of course they could. And they will. But there should be zero opposition.2001400ex said:
The right controls both houses of Congress and presidency. How exactly is the left doing anything? Really it's absurd how those on the right get people like you riled up about an issue. Then don't do anything about it. And con people like you. Thinking they actually will do something about it and it's the lefts fault for it not happening.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Before you respond with where I know you are going. Keep in mind that Congress just approved an increase to the military for $80 billion. They could easily get $20 billion through for the wall. -
Why haven't they? If it's such a no brainer issue?Pitchfork51 said:
Of course they could. And they will. But there should be zero opposition.2001400ex said:
The right controls both houses of Congress and presidency. How exactly is the left doing anything? Really it's absurd how those on the right get people like you riled up about an issue. Then don't do anything about it. And con people like you. Thinking they actually will do something about it and it's the lefts fault for it not happening.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Before you respond with where I know you are going. Keep in mind that Congress just approved an increase to the military for $80 billion. They could easily get $20 billion through for the wall. -
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it. -
The front door isn't open and unlocked. Dumbfuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it. -
Sure....2001400ex said:
The front door isn't open and unlocked. Dumbfuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
-
okay so a bunch of poor miserable people traipsing through the desert carrying ladders and ropes and explosives.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Do you not see that the degree of difficulty is about a million times more?
And if they start blowing shit up it wont be hard to find and stop them.
Many will not attempt it. The ones that do now only have limited routes which can be monitored much more easily.
You can't be this fucking dense.
Just come out and say it. It's mean and a symbol of racism and you'll lose points with your friends if you admit that it will do somehting. -
Americans have the right to determine if they want large scale demographic changes or not. Call that racist if you will, I don't really give a fuck because I know it isn't. Latinos are the majority now in several states. I guarantee most Americans are against further massive immigration from Latin America. Not because we're racist, but because we want America to stay American. Even the great divider himself said this:
"When I see Mexican flags waved at pro-immigration demonstrations, I sometimes feel a flush of patriotic resentment. When I'm forced to use a translator to communicate with the guy fixing my car, I feel a certain frustration."
I mean fuck, it hardly looks like America anymore in some towns and cities. Looks like Mexico, El Salvador or Venezuela. Gotta press fucking 1 on the phone just to hear English instead of Spanish. And people don't want that socialist mentality folks bring with them from those failed countries. Our so called 'leaders' forced this situation on us. Only we can change that, they aren't going to do shit about it. The United States of Latin America is not what we signed up for. Stop the flow. Stop the shitshow. -
Sounds like you are scared of dark skinned people. Both Muslim and Latino.oregonblitzkrieg said:Americans have the right to determine if they want large scale demographic changes or not. Call that racist if you will, I don't really give a fuck because I know it isn't. Latinos are the majority now in several states. I guarantee most Americans are against further massive immigration from Latin America. Not because we're racist, but because we want America to stay American. I mean fuck, it hardly looks like America anymore in some towns and cities. Looks like Mexico, El Salvador or Venezuela. Gotta press fucking 1 on the phone just to hear English instead of Spanish. And people don't want that socialist mentality folks bring with them from those failed countries. Our so called 'leaders' forced this situation on us. Only we can change that, they aren't going to do shit about it. The United States of Latin America is not what we signed up for. Stop the flow. Stop the shitshow. -
Sounds like you're a thick headed dumbass.2001400ex said:
Sounds like you are scared of dark skinned people. Both Muslim and Latino.oregonblitzkrieg said:Americans have the right to determine if they want large scale demographic changes or not. Call that racist if you will, I don't really give a fuck because I know it isn't. Latinos are the majority now in several states. I guarantee most Americans are against further massive immigration from Latin America. Not because we're racist, but because we want America to stay American. I mean fuck, it hardly looks like America anymore in some towns and cities. Looks like Mexico, El Salvador or Venezuela. Gotta press fucking 1 on the phone just to hear English instead of Spanish. And people don't want that socialist mentality folks bring with them from those failed countries. Our so called 'leaders' forced this situation on us. Only we can change that, they aren't going to do shit about it. The United States of Latin America is not what we signed up for. Stop the flow. Stop the shitshow. -
Since all those Hispanics can now vote it will make Kali a bigger 3rd world shithole.
-
If the government fails to act or the open borders establishment finds a way to block the voters' will as represented by Trump's immigration policies, call a convention of states to bypass those impotent fags and amend the Constitution to stop the destructive immigration path this country is on. I say amend it either way, our leaders cannot be trusted, nor can they be allowed to easily reverse the proposed immigration changes every time a new party takes power.
-
2001400ex said:
The right controls both houses of Congress and presidency. How exactly is the left doing anything? Really it's absurd how those on the right get people like you riled up about an issue. Then don't do anything about it. And con people like you. Thinking they actually will do something about it and it's the lefts fault for it not happening.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Before you respond with where I know you are going. Keep in mind that Congress just approved an increase to the military for $80 billion. They could easily get $20 billion through for the wall.
This is Congress. They clock in and make it appear like they are on opposite sides.
But their paychecks come from the same corporation(s).
-
No. It’s outdated and ineffective. You think some immigrant family is gonna risk everything, but then give up simply because there is a bigger wall?Pitchfork51 said:
okay so a bunch of poor miserable people traipsing through the desert carrying ladders and ropes and explosives.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
Do you not see that the degree of difficulty is about a million times more?
And if they start blowing shit up it wont be hard to find and stop them.
Many will not attempt it. The ones that do now only have limited routes which can be monitored much more easily.
You can't be this fucking dense.
Just come out and say it. It's mean and a symbol of racism and you'll lose points with your friends if you admit that it will do somehting. -
You think the lock on your door is gonna stop a determined home invader? El oh el.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it. -
Nope. Thank REAL GOD for the 2nd Amendment.ThomasFremont said:
You think the lock on your door is gonna stop a determined home invader? El oh el.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What a stupid argument. That's like saying leave the front door open and unlocked because it doesn't matter anyway, the burglar can find a way to get through the windows.ThomasFremont said:
Tunnels, ladders, ropes, boats, airplanes, explosives...these are just a few easy ways to deal with a wall. Throwing a shit ton of money at the wall to have it maybe stop less than 40% (and that’s a very generous estimate) is FS. They will just come another way.Pitchfork51 said:
It makes it far far more difficult. Therefore allowing us to focus on the narrower scope of ways they can actually get in2001400ex said:
If you think building a wall will stop the other 40%, you are FS. You clearly have never been down by the border.Pitchfork51 said:"Most come in legally" might be the dumbest of all the lefts arguments.
Okay if 60 percent come in and overstay their visas, but we stop majority of the other 40 percent.....
Then that makes a huge fucking difference!!
"Most come in legally! What's the point of even trying to stop anyone at all!"
Honestly if this weren't a bizarre political thing no one would disagree with it.
It's fucking absurd the lengths the left are going to with this.
I can't believe I even have to explain it.
