Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Zach Charbonnet, 4* 2019 RB, Westlake Village (Oaks Christian), CA (Offered)

1456810

Comments

  • guntloveguntlove Member Posts: 784

    A debate over who's a better scat back is way worse than the ballz big back debate. Ballz never even said UW should recruit ALL big backs. Just that it was vital to have at least one in the rotation for short yardage situations (4th down against Stanford last season) and to wear defenses down by forcing them to tackle a big physical body that can also make them miss or run right past them which is why fucking Zach Charbonnet was so fucking perfect for us but KB fucked it up! Hopefully Pleasant at least beats out tiny ass McGrew and adds some thump to RB position.

    Ballz couldn’t have said it better, oh wait...
  • kh83kh83 Member Posts: 596

    A debate over who's a better scat back is way worse than the ballz big back debate. Ballz never even said UW should recruit ALL big backs. Just that it was vital to have at least one in the rotation for short yardage situations (4th down against Stanford last season) and to wear defenses down by forcing them to tackle a big physical body that can also make them miss or run right past them which is why fucking Zach Charbonnet was so fucking perfect for us but KB fucked it up! Hopefully Pleasant at least beats out tiny ass McGrew and adds some thump to RB position.

    Stop referring to yourself in third person.
    Or just go away
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735
    kh83 said:

    A debate over who's a better scat back is way worse than the ballz big back debate. Ballz never even said UW should recruit ALL big backs. Just that it was vital to have at least one in the rotation for short yardage situations (4th down against Stanford last season) and to wear defenses down by forcing them to tackle a big physical body that can also make them miss or run right past them which is why fucking Zach Charbonnet was so fucking perfect for us but KB fucked it up! Hopefully Pleasant at least beats out tiny ass McGrew and adds some thump to RB position.

    Stop referring to yourself in third person.
    Or just go away
    Again, who the fuck is this guy? Anybody know? Seems like he's trying to be in the "in-crowd" but nobody knows who he is.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,499 Founders Club

    kh83 said:

    A debate over who's a better scat back is way worse than the ballz big back debate. Ballz never even said UW should recruit ALL big backs. Just that it was vital to have at least one in the rotation for short yardage situations (4th down against Stanford last season) and to wear defenses down by forcing them to tackle a big physical body that can also make them miss or run right past them which is why fucking Zach Charbonnet was so fucking perfect for us but KB fucked it up! Hopefully Pleasant at least beats out tiny ass McGrew and adds some thump to RB position.

    Stop referring to yourself in third person.
    Or just go away
    Again, who the fuck is this guy? Anybody know? Seems like he's trying to be in the "in-crowd" but nobody knows who he is.
    There's an "in-crowd" here?
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Swaye said:

    kh83 said:

    A debate over who's a better scat back is way worse than the ballz big back debate. Ballz never even said UW should recruit ALL big backs. Just that it was vital to have at least one in the rotation for short yardage situations (4th down against Stanford last season) and to wear defenses down by forcing them to tackle a big physical body that can also make them miss or run right past them which is why fucking Zach Charbonnet was so fucking perfect for us but KB fucked it up! Hopefully Pleasant at least beats out tiny ass McGrew and adds some thump to RB position.

    Stop referring to yourself in third person.
    Or just go away
    Again, who the fuck is this guy? Anybody know? Seems like he's trying to be in the "in-crowd" but nobody knows who he is.
    There's an "in-crowd" here?
    We're all out and proud in these parts.
  • AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    kh83 said:

    A debate over who's a better scat back is way worse than the ballz big back debate. Ballz never even said UW should recruit ALL big backs. Just that it was vital to have at least one in the rotation for short yardage situations (4th down against Stanford last season) and to wear defenses down by forcing them to tackle a big physical body that can also make them miss or run right past them which is why fucking Zach Charbonnet was so fucking perfect for us but KB fucked it up! Hopefully Pleasant at least beats out tiny ass McGrew and adds some thump to RB position.

    Stop referring to yourself in third person.
    Or just go away
    Again, who the fuck is this guy? Anybody know? Seems like he's trying to be in the "in-crowd" but nobody knows who he is.
    The longer you play out this “I have no idea who this ballz guy is” schtick the more embarassing it gets. Cringeworthy really.
    It is brutal.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Do we have a shot with this kid?
  • SquirtSquirt Member Posts: 485

    Do we have a shot with this kid?

    USC is his dream school, but he's probably going to Clemson.
  • UDubHusky23UDubHusky23 Member Posts: 889
    Probably nothing but if harbaugh sells the couch this yr... bonerpopper and Pete might want to keep recruiting this guy
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735
    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
    We weren't afraid to pound in there because of our RB's.

    hth
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
    We weren't afraid to pound in there because of our RB's.

    hth
    Yes we were.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
    We weren't afraid to pound in there because of our RB's.

    hth
    Yes we were.
    Dude, the OL needs to create a hole for an RB to hit. The execution that was lacking on Saturday
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
    We weren't afraid to pound in there because of our RB's.

    hth
    Yes we were.
    Dude, the OL needs to create a hole for an RB to hit. The execution that was lacking on Saturday
    I think they were capable of creating a hole. Then it's just a matter of do you have a running back that can run through one of Auburn's LBs and get in the end zone. I don't think we have that guy right now.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,890

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
    We weren't afraid to pound in there because of our RB's.

    hth
    Yes we were.
    Dude, the OL needs to create a hole for an RB to hit. The execution that was lacking on Saturday
    I think they were capable of creating a hole. Then it's just a matter of do you have a running back that can run through one of Auburn's LBs and get in the end zone. I don't think we have that guy right now.
    I agree with you the fact that we don’t have a big back ... Gaskin’s quite proficient in general in short yardage situations so whatever there

    It’s a nice to have ... it’s not a must have

    Your blocking comment may have some weight behind it
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,366

    Need him. Can't win a national championship with no big back on the roster.

    Of the things possibly between us and a natty this is like number nine on the list at the highest.
    It's higher than that. Need a back that can break tackles, pound it between the tackles in short yardage and goal line situations, and stand on his feet and stone a blitzing LB in pass pro. You have to have a guy that can do that shit. You can't line up against Auburn on the 3 yard line and be afraid to pound the ball in there for the TD.
    You can’t run an option with a pussy QB who doesn’t have his reads down but we did anyway. The Seahawks had Marshawn Lynch and decided to throw a slant. Stupid is is as stupid does.
This discussion has been closed.