Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Scott Woodward: will he be a Stone Cold Savage or a wilting flower?

13567…10

Comments

  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,370
    section8 said:

    HFNY said:

    Because I think it's important for Hardcore Fans who want to strive for more continue to read opinions that don't toe the party line.

    I kind of feel sorry for the DM.com guys (please don't hate me for saying that)...they just aren't in the best spot right now...they probably know deep down that Sarkisian isn't "The Guy" but they rely on his and Woodward's good graces for program access, "insider" knowledge, and coach/player interviews.

    The irony there is that their website would probably be more successful if the weren't trying to kiss so much ass and were actually honest about the state of things but half the subscribers there only want to read feel good info and the other half are stalking teenagers.

    This
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If we finish 4-5, Woodward is full of shit because he was pretty clear in a Seattle Times chat that he expected improvements. He was asked about 7-6 and 5-4, and said he would not give a win total, but he expected more wins. Of course, he will have bullshit excuses like tough road schedule, banged up Price, incremental progress in other areas, stability, etc. I think we are fucked.

    Woodward like Sark is always full of shit and full of excuses. He'll bring Sark back at 7 wins.

    RIP REAL Washington Football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HFNY said:

    I'm in the same boat, they won't let me post on the Hardcore Husky board unless they approve it first. Oh well.

    Humor me for a moment: if we beat Cal by 24, then lose @ UCLA by 13, then lose @ OSU by 7, we will be 3-5 in conference. If Woodward doesn't get on board and get rid of Sarkisian, how do we get rid of Woodward then? Organize a march? Organize a press conference? What can we do to get Woodward to act in our and the program's best interests rather than his own?

    Should that scenario play out, a REAL athletic director would have Cozzetto coach the Apple Cup and the bowl game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HFNY said:

    I'm in the same boat, they won't let me post on the Hardcore Husky board unless they approve it first. Oh well.

    Humor me for a moment: if we beat Cal by 24, then lose @ UCLA by 13, then lose @ OSU by 7, we will be 3-5 in conference. If Woodward doesn't get on board and get rid of Sarkisian, how do we get rid of Woodward then? Organize a march? Organize a press conference? What can we do to get Woodward to act in our and the program's best interests rather than his own?

    Should that scenario play out, a REAL athletic director would have Cozzetto coach the Apple Cup and the bowl game.
    A REAL athletic director would have given Sark his walking papers after last years Apple Cup and let Cozzetto coach the bowl game.

    Then this year we might have actually had a good fucking season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HFNY said:

    I'm in the same boat, they won't let me post on the Hardcore Husky board unless they approve it first. Oh well.

    Humor me for a moment: if we beat Cal by 24, then lose @ UCLA by 13, then lose @ OSU by 7, we will be 3-5 in conference. If Woodward doesn't get on board and get rid of Sarkisian, how do we get rid of Woodward then? Organize a march? Organize a press conference? What can we do to get Woodward to act in our and the program's best interests rather than his own?

    Should that scenario play out, a REAL athletic director would have Cozzetto coach the Apple Cup and the bowl game.
    A REAL athletic director would have given Sark his walking papers after last years Apple Cup and let Cozzetto coach the bowl game.

    Then this year we might have actually had a good fucking season.
    True, or better yet, shitcanned him after the 2011 Alamo Bowel.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HFNY said:

    I'm in the same boat, they won't let me post on the Hardcore Husky board unless they approve it first. Oh well.

    Humor me for a moment: if we beat Cal by 24, then lose @ UCLA by 13, then lose @ OSU by 7, we will be 3-5 in conference. If Woodward doesn't get on board and get rid of Sarkisian, how do we get rid of Woodward then? Organize a march? Organize a press conference? What can we do to get Woodward to act in our and the program's best interests rather than his own?

    Should that scenario play out, a REAL athletic director would have Cozzetto coach the Apple Cup and the bowl game.
    A REAL athletic director would have given Sark his walking papers after last years Apple Cup and let Cozzetto coach the bowl game.

    Then this year we might have actually had a good fucking season.
    True, or better yet, shitcanned him after the 2011 Alamo Bowel.
    Instead we have an A.D. who is more over his head than Sark so we get to hear constantly about "incremental progress".

    UW football hasn't had a good A.D. since Lude. Although sadly Hedges was our best A.D. since Lude(not saying much I know).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,580
    Am I asking too much in asking for potential solutions if we find ourselves 3-5 in conference after the OSU game? Will Woodward act and if not, how can we force him to act or force him out?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    HFNY said:

    I just don't think it's good enough to complain but to channel that frustration / energy towards getting RESULTS.

    Does anyone have any better ideas than mine? Surely some of you are more creative / intelligent than me, right?

    Here's something to consider that's more intellegent than your strength-of-schedule once removed performance analysis:

    Would Sarkisian as a former offensive coordinator with no previous head coaching experience have done better replacing Mike Bellotti at Oregon than he has done in replacing Tyrone Willingham at UW? Think of it as the Woody Factor as in Do It the Oregon Way or if you prefer,..... Oregon's Academics Are Embarrassing.

    If this is confusing for you, the point I'm trying to make is that when you know something about major college football, silly questions such as you've posted here won't be necessary for forming a conclusion about whether or not Sark is the head football coach we need and deserve.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter