Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Scott Woodward: will he be a Stone Cold Savage or a wilting flower?

12357…10

Comments

  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,945
    sarktastic said:

    HFNY said:

    I'm in the same boat, they won't let me post on the Hardcore Husky board unless they approve it first. Oh well.

    Humor me for a moment: if we beat Cal by 24, then lose @ UCLA by 13, then lose @ OSU by 7, we will be 3-5 in conference. If Woodward doesn't get on board and get rid of Sarkisian, how do we get rid of Woodward then? Organize a march? Organize a press conference? What can we do to get Woodward to act in our and the program's best interests rather than his own?

    But will they still take your money?

    The Faux lawyers are tuff about the "no refund" policy with the 12 month advance payment. They don't care if the rules changed or if the Nazis take over the bored.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    whuggy said:

    This will sound very odd but our best hope
    is for the Mariners to become decent or better.
    There is only so much disposable income from
    the average fan dedicated to sporting events.
    Currently the Huskies lie in second position for that
    disposable income after the Seahawks. The new
    stadium boost will leave quickly, just like Safeco,
    and REAL Husky fans will want results. I just don't
    see Woodward and the president being happy with
    being third choice for the sports dollar. And I am
    not including the Sounders as that seems to be more
    a niche fan to me. Ultimately if we got the Sonics back
    there would be real pressure on the UW to put out a winning
    product.

    The reason not to worry about the Sounders is because they already sell out and can't take a bigger chunk of fans than they already have.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232
    The reason not to worry about the Sounders is that 75% of their fan base is counter-culture hipster pussies that would have no interest in tackle football anyway because it's too violent for their skin tight jeans
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    The reason not to worry about the Sounders is that 75% of their fan base is counter-culture hipster pussies that would have no interest in tackle football anyway because it's too violent for their skin tight jeans

    Mellow true?!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,790 Founders Club
    HFNY said:

    I just don't think it's good enough to complain but to channel that frustration / energy towards getting RESULTS.

    Does anyone have any better ideas than mine? Surely some of you are more creative / intelligent than me, right?

    I highly doubt that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,790 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    The reason not to worry about the Sounders is that 75% of their fan base is counter-culture hipster pussies that would have no interest in tackle football anyway because it's too violent for their skin tight jeans

    Disagree. I saw one guy at the Cal game* that looks just like the person you described.




































    *Yes, I hate money.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,012
    Tequilla said:

    The reason not to worry about the Sounders is that 75% of their fan base is counter-culture hipster pussies that would have no interest in tackle football anyway because it's too violent for their skin tight jeans

    The Sounder's owners care a hell of a lot more about winning than the people in charge at UW right now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,151 Standard Supporter
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    SpoonieLuv said:

    Sark on the Mitch KJR show this AM said that the last 4 games of this season will define this football team. Thanks for putting this out there Coach; when we finish 2-2 or 1-3 I want this replayed for him.

    It really is a shame nobody in this fucking town ever holds Sark to his statements when he doesn't back it up.

    I would have loved after the Alamo Bowl for one reporter to go "Hey coach, since you claimed the season was House Money you guys finished the year losing four out of five. Do you feel like the team took on your attitude that the season didn't matter since you clinched a trip to a bowl game? I thought you said two years ago your goal was to win championships and Rose Bowls when did you change those goals?".
    With a few exceptions, the Seattle-Tacoma-Everett Metroplex media is full of pussies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,012
    And another thing about this effing thread that keeps coming up every week. Anyone read our Premium partner's summary of Sark's kick-ass presser today and get any sense of urgency that he's even remotely worried about his job if they lay a couple of rotten eggs in the next 4 weeks? He knows he is safe from Poolboy...no clue why anyone would think otherwise.

    And I'm sure our recruiting class will generally blow with a bunch of 4* receivers (half of which should be switched to CBs) and only 2 or 3 diamond in the rough OL that no one else really wanted but they will start in 2 years ahead of our no-name OLs that we took the last couple of years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter