Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon in at #17

13567

Comments

  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.

    If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.

    Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
    Maybe it's time to stop watching football
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.

    If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.

    Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
    Maybe it's time to stop watching football
    Apparently, some sad institution pays this man for his inside football "knowledge."
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,287

    Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.

    image

    You hired willingham 2.0

    You spelled Sark wrong
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,975
    There's already a black sark letting it rip
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited August 2017
    Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.

    image
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,975

    Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.

    image

    Fuck you and fuck Oregon.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam

    Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.

    image

    Fuck you and fuck Oregon.
    This is just what they want all the poor people in Oregon to think so they'll buy more faggy shoes and jerseys.

    Was written about by numerous people close to the program in this area. Uncle Phil ain't buying them shit. He wants them to quook so they'll buy more of his company's shit. The results of their coaching search said as much.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.

    If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.

    Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
    Maybe it's time to stop breathing
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

    Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.

    image

    Nobody tries harder in the Natty's than Oregon.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    Oregon is all about try.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dflea said:

    Oregon is all about try.

    Playing for all the marbles is fun. UW should try it sometime.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles

    Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,020 Founders Club

    Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles

    Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.
    Losers lose, loser

    We won
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,947 Founders Club
    Mosster coached running backs at Cholla High for a year guys. You'd better listen.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited August 2017

    Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles

    Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.
    Losers lose, loser

    We won
    Last time I checked, they canceled your championship game vs the Canes. At least everyone got a non-participation trophy though.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,302 Founders Club

    Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles

    Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.
    Losers lose, loser

    We won
    Last time I checked, they canceled your championship game vs the Canes. At least everyone got a non-participation trophy though.
    image
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,302 Founders Club

    Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles

    Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.
    Losers lose, loser

    We won
    image
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles

    Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.
    Losers lose, loser

    We won
    image
    I've been trying to find the stats for that championship game you won but for some reason I just can't. I can't even find the score. What gives?
Sign In or Register to comment.