Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon in at #17

24567

Comments

  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited August 2017
    oh, oh, did the Mountie dismount?


    Momma Duck of 2 adorable ducklings!! UO Duck Football fanatic! Proud Oregon Grad '97.
  • IPukeOregonGrellowIPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    edited August 2017

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.
    You can just say Oregon has a pretty good oline that will never have to suffer a Jesse Sosebee start and your argument is mostly the same.
    Crisped.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,302 Founders Club

    Baseman said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
    image
    Nice use of my protected IP
    You Gnu hear?
    image
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,302 Founders Club

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.

    If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.

    Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.

    If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.

    Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
    Because I hate the Washington Huskies and you're going to suck again soon and it's literally the funniest thing on the internet when it happens.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,302 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.

    If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.

    Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.

    Huh?

    image
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,900 Swaye's Wigwam
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
    UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.

    Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
    Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care.
    I think Upper Campus appreciates Petersen and gaping Oregon's asshole both on the field and in the classroom. Of course, in the classroom will never change, but they probably know better than to hire another drunken idiot when Pete gets tired of collecting rings in a decade.
  • TokenBlackTokenBlack Member Posts: 34
    edited August 2017

    Mosster47 said:

    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
    image
    That's not the "O" she's throwing up there.
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Mosster47 said:

    The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.

    The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.

    Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.

    One of the middle backers is a walk-on.

    image
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    This is past Hondo and right into Mosstard stupid. Juts because they were young and shitty last season doesn't mean they are going to transfer to a year older and dominant.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,978 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.

    The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.

    Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.

    One of the middle backers is a walk-on.


    The first two paragraphs were reading like an epic 5 reasons ...


    Then you just couldn't help yourself, could you?
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.

    image
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,975

    Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.

    image

    You hired willingham 2.0

  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.

    image

    You hired willingham 2.0

    You guys want Oregon's narrative to play out like Washington's so badly, it's funny. Yeah I said you guys. Take off that devil mask you doog troll, we know you're in there...
Sign In or Register to comment.