Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon in at #17

Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,176
In the deadspin 25

"Can They Make The Playoff?

No, Oregon, can’t make the playoff, win the Pac-12, or even challenge for the Pac-12 North—I don’t see Washington showing up in the playoff either, but the Huskies, let alone Stanford, ain’t losing this thing to the fucking Ducks."

http://deadspin.com/oregon-will-be-as-bad-as-its-defense-allows-1798408431

@oregonblitzkrieg @Mosster47 @AZDuck
«134567

Comments

  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited August 2017
    The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.

    The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.

    Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.

    One of the middle backers is a walk-on.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Baseman said:

    Mosster47 said:

    The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.

    The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.

    Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with s 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.

    One of the middle backers is a walk-on.

    So you're saying the Ducks can win if they score more points than their D allows?
    Yes, but that's only going to happen against the shit birds like Cal, ASU, and the Beavies.
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    Mosster47 said:

    Baseman said:

    Mosster47 said:

    The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.

    The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.

    Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with s 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.

    One of the middle backers is a walk-on.

    So you're saying the Ducks can win if they score more points than their D allows?
    Yes, but that's only going to happen against the shit birds like Cal, ASU, and the Beavies.
    Dick Rods Cats ?
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    Mosster is not a quook. He's a hybrid. A quoot. HTH.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited August 2017
    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,294 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
    image
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496 Standard Supporter
    Baseman said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
    Classy twat
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365

    Mosster47 said:

    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
    image
    Nice use of my protected IP
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496 Standard Supporter
    Baseman said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Sources said:

    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    QPOTD
    It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.

    Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
    image
    Nice use of my protected IP
    You Gnu hear?
  • Edwin_BambinoEdwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,943
    edited August 2017
    Mosster47 said:

    They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?

    Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.

    Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.

    Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
    UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.
Sign In or Register to comment.