What the fuck is next?
Comments
-
I lived in Japan for two years, dumbfuck. Spent six months in Thailand and multiple trips to Korea. Also, know more about Islamofag tactics than you ever will because I used to target fucking terrorists for a living.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Hi there. Obviously you're the cuck that hasn't been there. Either that, or you've just never been to Japan or Thailand to make the comparison. Korea is boring compared to those 2 countries.AZDuck said:
Hi there. Obviously you've never been to Korea.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Korea is trendy. Lol. It's probably the most boring of the Asian countries. Nice, but boring. Not trendy. Hth.AZDuck said:
UO is South Korea. Kind of faggy and trendy but will still kick your ass.Pitchfork51 said:UW is the Netherlands. Used to be like the 5th best and thought they were powerful.
But now all they've got is marijuana.
You are like Venezuela. Thought you were the new hit shit due to a new retarded philosophy that seemed good on the outside. But now you've crumbled into shit.
Don't worry. ASU is the incas.
Used to be good in theory so fucking long ago people don't even believe it ever existed.
Shut the fuck up, Donny. You're out of your element. -
Arizona State is basically Botswana or Lesotho. AIDS infested.
-
You might be right. Never been there.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Disagree. Malays are, and it's not very close.Pitchfork51 said:I've been to Seoul.
I thought it was solid.
Used to work for DHL.
Korean people I generally think are the best looking Asian people.
(Fuck off btp. I don't mean you)
Fuck off anyway. -
You're an islamofag loving cuck. You shut the fuck up. I believe your claims slightly more than Mosster's. That isn't saying much. But still.AZDuck said:
I lived in Japan for two years, dumbfuck. Spent six months in Thailand and multiple trips to Korea. Also, know more about Islamofag tactics than you ever will because I used to target fucking terrorists for a living.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Hi there. Obviously you're the cuck that hasn't been there. Either that, or you've just never been to Japan or Thailand to make the comparison. Korea is boring compared to those 2 countries.AZDuck said:
Hi there. Obviously you've never been to Korea.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Korea is trendy. Lol. It's probably the most boring of the Asian countries. Nice, but boring. Not trendy. Hth.AZDuck said:
UO is South Korea. Kind of faggy and trendy but will still kick your ass.Pitchfork51 said:UW is the Netherlands. Used to be like the 5th best and thought they were powerful.
But now all they've got is marijuana.
You are like Venezuela. Thought you were the new hit shit due to a new retarded philosophy that seemed good on the outside. But now you've crumbled into shit.
Don't worry. ASU is the incas.
Used to be good in theory so fucking long ago people don't even believe it ever existed.
Shut the fuck up, Donny. You're out of your element. -
HIV bitch. It doesn't come to aids. Get with the times pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:Arizona State is basically Botswana or Lesotho. AIDS infested.
Speaking of.
Even though I have a flight at 9am I'm debating going out to the bar.
It's been almost a month since I got the NTD BB
-
AZDuck said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Hi there. Obviously you're the cuck that hasn't been there. Either that, or you've just never been to Japan or Thailand to make the comparison. Korea is boring compared to those 2 countries.AZDuck said:
Hi there. Obviously you've never been to Korea.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Korea is trendy. Lol. It's probably the most boring of the Asian countries. Nice, but boring. Not trendy. Hth.AZDuck said:
UO is South Korea. Kind of faggy and trendy but will still kick your ass.Pitchfork51 said:UW is the Netherlands. Used to be like the 5th best and thought they were powerful.
But now all they've got is marijuana.
You are like Venezuela. Thought you were the new hit shit due to a new retarded philosophy that seemed good on the outside. But now you've crumbled into shit.
Don't worry. ASU is the incas.
Used to be good in theory so fucking long ago people don't even believe it ever existed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV4HINGUpBM -
Cool. Make sure to poast on HH while drunk so I can collect more material to hit you with later.Pitchfork51 said:
HIV bitch. It doesn't come to aids. Get with the times pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:Arizona State is basically Botswana or Lesotho. AIDS infested.
Speaking of.
Even though I have a flight at 9am I'm debating going out to the bar.
It's been almost a month since I got the NTD BB -
The Israeli Jews are hotter than both.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Disagree. Malays are, and it's not very close.Pitchfork51 said:I've been to Seoul.
I thought it was solid.
Used to work for DHL.
Korean people I generally think are the best looking Asian people.
(Fuck off btp. I don't mean you)
However I did some informal research by google image searching 'hot Malaysian women' and 'hot Korean women'.
Except my phone defaults to bing as the search engine. And I have come to the following conclusion:
1 - Bing has no safe filters
2 - Malaysian and Korean women both have no problem taking copious volumes of nude pictures.
But i would have to give the edge to Koreans in general hotness -
In the throbbers new religion I win!PurpleThrobber said:
The Israeli Jews are hotter than both.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Disagree. Malays are, and it's not very close.Pitchfork51 said:I've been to Seoul.
I thought it was solid.
Used to work for DHL.
Korean people I generally think are the best looking Asian people.
(Fuck off btp. I don't mean you)
However I did some informal research by google image searching 'hot Malaysian women' and 'hot Korean women'.
Except my phone defaults to bing as the search engine. And I have come to the following conclusion:
1 - Bing has no safe filters
2 - Malaysian and Korean women both have no problem taking copious volumes of nude pictures.
But i would have to give the edge to Koreans in general hotness -
Feel freeoregonblitzkrieg said:
Cool. Make sure to poast on HH while drunk so I can collect more material to hit you with later.Pitchfork51 said:
HIV bitch. It doesn't come to aids. Get with the times pussy.oregonblitzkrieg said:Arizona State is basically Botswana or Lesotho. AIDS infested.
Speaking of.
Even though I have a flight at 9am I'm debating going out to the bar.
It's been almost a month since I got the NTD BB
We still hate liberal pussies
So since you aren't a vegan mangina I'm okay with it -
-
Destroy all islamofags. That's it. And the world will be better off for it. Case closed. End of discussion.AZDuck said:
Like we won the first three months in Iraq. Then what? 360 million versus 10 million. They control a huge chunk of the world's oil. Global economy goes haywire. IDF can probably push out 100 or so miles from Israeli borders without logistical help from guess who.Pitchfork51 said:
I actually mean it thoughAZDuck said:
With nukes, sure. Conventional arms? Not so much.Pitchfork51 said:
Unless I'm wildly mistaken....say no other powers got involved including the us. Couldn't Israel singlehandedly destroy the entire rest of the middle east?AZDuck said:
Megiddo is in Israel. So sure, Israel should invade Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Syria.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It's the only non Islamocuck state in the Middle East. That makes it superior by default. It should expand its bordersDoogles said:People hating on Israel need to stop. The best state in the middle East and it's not even close.
Too bad fucking Hezbollah kicked their asses last time they tried.
The IDF and Israel, for that matter, doesn't have the manpower to actually occupy much more territory than they currently hold. Eventually we and the Russkies would get dragged in, or Israel uses their nukes, and well, the human race will have had a nice run.
Say no one else got dragged in.
Israel would clearly win right??
Every time Israel has done it in the past, they've regretted it. Think Suez, think Lebanon in the 80's, think Hezbollah ten years ago. The IDF succeeded in knocking out Hezbollah TV for ten whole minutes. All of south Lebanon is tank traps, pre-positioned IEDs and ambushes.
If Race is right (Race is never right, we argued about invading Iraq in 2003 and I was right then) and the Sunni states are serious about cutting a deal with Israel, that is only because they fear the Shia Iranians. We'd be choosing sides in an intra-Islamic civil war. Fuck that. -
-
No. Israel has no supply lines, minimal manufacturing, and our ancient stuff to fight with. I was there last year when we dropped of the six F-15/C models they bought from us that were ready to go to the bone yard.Pitchfork51 said:
I actually mean it thoughAZDuck said:
With nukes, sure. Conventional arms? Not so much.Pitchfork51 said:
Unless I'm wildly mistaken....say no other powers got involved including the us. Couldn't Israel singlehandedly destroy the entire rest of the middle east?AZDuck said:
Megiddo is in Israel. So sure, Israel should invade Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Syria.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It's the only non Islamocuck state in the Middle East. That makes it superior by default. It should expand its bordersDoogles said:People hating on Israel need to stop. The best state in the middle East and it's not even close.
Too bad fucking Hezbollah kicked their asses last time they tried.
The IDF and Israel, for that matter, doesn't have the manpower to actually occupy much more territory than they currently hold. Eventually we and the Russkies would get dragged in, or Israel uses their nukes, and well, the human race will have had a nice run.
Say no one else got dragged in.
Israel would clearly win right??
Israel has what it needs to protect itself from all enemies foreign and domestic, but I would limit their mobility to about 200 miles before their lines started breaking down.
So in short, no they couldn't win with conventional weapons. Have you noticed our 16 year wheel spinning over there? We've gotten about as far as a rocking chair. -
@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias -
Hamas =/= Hezbollah
Hamas is in Gaza, they are Sunni retards
Hezbollah is in South Lebanon, they are well-organized, Shia, and not retards
HTH
And in any war, you have to deal with the aftermath, whether the initial phase was 15 minutes or 15 months. We occupied Germany for four years, and we occupied Japan for seven. We also flooded those countries with hundreds of thousands of GIs. The GWB braintrust pulled out troops before the country was even stable after the initial invasion, such was their rush to do Iraq on the cheap.
We're not taking over anyone's turf anytime soon. So anyone we fight we're going to give it back. That's why we should, you know, plan for the aftermath. -
We still occupy Germany and Japan
-
No we don'tRaceBannon said:We still occupy Germany and Japan
-
-
By chinvitation, gai jin.TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
We also have military bases in South Korea, Portugal, the UK, Singapore, Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Turkey, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE, Jordan, Norway, Honduras, and other countries we've never been at war with. We don't occupy them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
"Occupation" means that the occupying power is exercising sovereignty over the occupied state. -
Right, but they asked us to he there and we follow all the laws of the host Nation. When we would return back to Germany on Sunday's we would land in a neighboring country and wait for six hours so we wouldn't break the sound law on Sunday's there.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When you occupy you do what you do. When you're there diplomatically you adhere to host nation. -
Dammit...I try to prevent Race from being shredded in a thread ONE TIME and this is what I get.AZDuck said:
We also have military bases in South Korea, Portugal, the UK, Singapore, Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Turkey, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE, Jordan, Norway, Honduras, and other countries we've never been at war with. We don't occupy them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
"Occupation" means that the occupying power is exercising sovereignty over the occupied state. -
Chinterestingly enough, in spite of Little Man/Fat Boy, Tokyo, Dresden, et al, The US only accounted for a relatively small fraction of the 50 to 75 million killed in WWII. That body count was almost entirely Japanese killing Chinese, Soviets killing Germans (and whoever else Stalin wanted shot), and Germans killing everyone east of the Molotov - Ribbentrop line. Hell, RAF bomber command actually killed more kraut civilians than the USAAF did.RaceBannon said:@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias -
Kind of how Tony Soprano invites you to use his hauling serviceGrundleStiltzkin said:
By chinvitation, gai jin.TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
Pretty sure the Bombing of Tokyo had about the same number of deaths as Little Man/Fat Boy. Today's nukes are literally 1000x more powerful, so results would be a little different now.YellowSnow said:
Chinterestingly enough, in spite of Little Man/Fat Boy, Tokyo, Dresden, et al, The US only accounted for a relatively small fraction of the 50 to 75 million killed in WWII. That body count was almost entirely Japanese killing Chinese, Soviets killing Germans (and whoever else Stalin wanted shot), and Germans killing everyone east of the Molotov - Ribbentrop line. Hell, RAF bomber command actually killed more kraut civilians than the USAAF did.RaceBannon said:@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias -
Chinsightful.UWhuskytskeet said:
Pretty sure the Bombing of Tokyo had about the same number of deaths as Little Man/Fat Boy. Today's nukes are literally 1000x more powerful, so results would be a little different now.YellowSnow said:
Chinterestingly enough, in spite of Little Man/Fat Boy, Tokyo, Dresden, et al, The US only accounted for a relatively small fraction of the 50 to 75 million killed in WWII. That body count was almost entirely Japanese killing Chinese, Soviets killing Germans (and whoever else Stalin wanted shot), and Germans killing everyone east of the Molotov - Ribbentrop line. Hell, RAF bomber command actually killed more kraut civilians than the USAAF did.RaceBannon said:@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias -
Correct, but not so much my point here. Just random fun facting that most the death and destruction of WWII was not in fact inflicted by America in spite our overwhelming industrial might. The one good things about nukes to date is that except for a few close calls MAD tends to prevent world wars. Who knows if that will continue to be the case...UWhuskytskeet said:
Pretty sure the Bombing of Tokyo had about the same number of deaths as Little Man/Fat Boy. Today's nukes are literally 1000x more powerful, so results would be a little different now.YellowSnow said:
Chinterestingly enough, in spite of Little Man/Fat Boy, Tokyo, Dresden, et al, The US only accounted for a relatively small fraction of the 50 to 75 million killed in WWII. That body count was almost entirely Japanese killing Chinese, Soviets killing Germans (and whoever else Stalin wanted shot), and Germans killing everyone east of the Molotov - Ribbentrop line. Hell, RAF bomber command actually killed more kraut civilians than the USAAF did.RaceBannon said:@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias -
Read this book last year. You probably mean chintentional use, but the number of accidents is astoundingly high.YellowSnow said:
Correct, but not so much my point here. Just random fun facting that most the death and destruction of WWII was not in fact inflicted by America in spite our overwhelming industrial might. The one good things about nukes to date is that except for a few close calls MAD tends to prevent world wars. Who knows if that will continue to be the case...UWhuskytskeet said:
Pretty sure the Bombing of Tokyo had about the same number of deaths as Little Man/Fat Boy. Today's nukes are literally 1000x more powerful, so results would be a little different now.YellowSnow said:
Chinterestingly enough, in spite of Little Man/Fat Boy, Tokyo, Dresden, et al, The US only accounted for a relatively small fraction of the 50 to 75 million killed in WWII. That body count was almost entirely Japanese killing Chinese, Soviets killing Germans (and whoever else Stalin wanted shot), and Germans killing everyone east of the Molotov - Ribbentrop line. Hell, RAF bomber command actually killed more kraut civilians than the USAAF did.RaceBannon said:@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias -
We? lost a silo in Arkansas. Not sure if that is what the book is about.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Read this book last year. You probably mean chintentional use, but the number of accidents is astoundingly high.YellowSnow said:
Correct, but not so much my point here. Just random fun facting that most the death and destruction of WWII was not in fact inflicted by America in spite our overwhelming industrial might. The one good things about nukes to date is that except for a few close calls MAD tends to prevent world wars. Who knows if that will continue to be the case...UWhuskytskeet said:
Pretty sure the Bombing of Tokyo had about the same number of deaths as Little Man/Fat Boy. Today's nukes are literally 1000x more powerful, so results would be a little different now.YellowSnow said:
Chinterestingly enough, in spite of Little Man/Fat Boy, Tokyo, Dresden, et al, The US only accounted for a relatively small fraction of the 50 to 75 million killed in WWII. That body count was almost entirely Japanese killing Chinese, Soviets killing Germans (and whoever else Stalin wanted shot), and Germans killing everyone east of the Molotov - Ribbentrop line. Hell, RAF bomber command actually killed more kraut civilians than the USAAF did.RaceBannon said:@AZDuck
The point on Israel or us? in Iraq is that the good guys lose by being good guys. FDR had the luxury of complete censorship as we did our part in the death of 50 million people or so to get rid of Hitler and Tojo
That's why I am now anti war because we will do what we did in Iraq. Kick their ass in 15 minutes then give it all back over the next years. Israel has the same issues. But to think Hamas can kick anyone's ass is retarded. And it shows your bias
I agree with Yellow though - the A bomb was nothing special in regards to killing and MAD has been a big part of the kind of peace since WW2. Never meant to imply that we killed the 50 million.
The point is there was a training exercise for D Day that killed thousands. And CNN video of Normandy would have ended the war on the spot.
