We all lost those last 8 years and the country is woke that Socialism doesn't work, no matter how many @d2d dog and pony show crayon sharts you wish to splatter up there.
You are an actual retarded person if you think Obama is a socialist. He'd be right wing in most European countries.
#woke
Nothing wrong with that. It's truly the answer.
Republicans will rule politics if they ever figure it out. The Bible belt that floats them needs to understand that God works in mysterious ways and people like to get high and abort babies.
Tax drugs = money
Abort unwanted children = population control/social service relief
No brainer, except God.
What data are you using to draw the conclusion that republicans would rule politics if they were socially liberal/fiscally responsible? Is it that Bernie Sanders is the most popular politician in America? Or that the majority of Americans support his economic policies?
I'm not even convinced this is a real thing. Social and economic issues are intertwined. At some point you're going to have to choose between your social liberalism and you fiscal conservativeness and at that point you stop being whatever you didn't choose.
It just seems like something you say because you think it sounds smart. Like calling yourself agnostic. It sounds good, best of both worlds! But ultimately it's meaningless.
This is rich coming from the Hardcore Husky Random Politics Generator
We all lost those last 8 years and the country is woke that Socialism doesn't work, no matter how many @d2d dog and pony show crayon sharts you wish to splatter up there.
You are an actual retarded person if you think Obama is a socialist. He'd be right wing in most European countries.
#woke
Nothing wrong with that. It's truly the answer.
Republicans will rule politics if they ever figure it out. The Bible belt that floats them needs to understand that God works in mysterious ways and people like to get high and abort babies.
Tax drugs = money
Abort unwanted children = population control/social service relief
No brainer, except God.
What data are you using to draw the conclusion that republicans would rule politics if they were socially liberal/fiscally responsible? Is it that Bernie Sanders is the most popular politician in America? Or that the majority of Americans support his economic policies?
I'm not even convinced this is a real thing. Social and economic issues are intertwined. At some point you're going to have to choose between your social liberalism and you fiscal conservativeness and at that point you stop being whatever you didn't choose.
It just seems like something you say because you think it sounds smart. Like calling yourself agnostic. It sounds good, best of both worlds! But ultimately it's meaningless.
This is rich coming from the Hardcore Husky Random Politics Generator
We all lost those last 8 years and the country is woke that Socialism doesn't work, no matter how many @d2d dog and pony show crayon sharts you wish to splatter up there.
You are an actual retarded person if you think Obama is a socialist. He'd be right wing in most European countries.
We all lost those last 8 years and the country is woke that Socialism doesn't work, no matter how many @d2d dog and pony show crayon sharts you wish to splatter up there.
You are an actual retarded person if you think Obama is a socialist. He'd be right wing in most European countries.
We all lost those last 8 years and the country is woke that Socialism doesn't work, no matter how many @d2d dog and pony show crayon sharts you wish to splatter up there.
You are an actual retarded person if you think Obama is a socialist. He'd be right wing in most European countries.
Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?
Losers change the rules after they lose.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What rules did I change?
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Winners win.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?
Losers change the rules after they lose.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What rules did I change?
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Winners win.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
Then shut the fuck up then already.
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?
Losers change the rules after they lose.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What rules did I change?
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Winners win.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
Then shut the fuck up then already.
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.
So Sweden pays more than the US does for defense and foreign aid and all that stuff eh??? Everyone knows you're full retard on that.
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?
Losers change the rules after they lose.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What rules did I change?
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Winners win.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
Then shut the fuck up then already.
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.
Trump would have won the popular vote if he needed it to win the presidency.
The rules of the game he played dictated his strategy. If you can't see that, you're probably still confused how Hillary lost.
That's dumb. Where was he going to get three million votes?
Losers change the rules after they lose.
You've reached reddit status in this thread and I question your reasoning skills to be a Mall cop.
What rules did I change?
What did Sweden change last year that is going to bankrupt it? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
When did the US adopt socialism (democratic or otherwise) as its ruling principle? Can you cite to an authority besides your unwashed ass?
Donald Trump is not a very popular president. You have to go back to 2004 to find an election where Trump's vote total would have won the popular vote. Back then the US population was 32 million less than it was in 2016.
His ratings haven't been shooting up since he was inaugurated, either.
Trump did great with the system in place. But an election with low turnout, both parties' candidates historically unpopular, over a million write-in votes, that's no mandate, fren.
Winners win.
Losers make up excuses.
And it's clear you blew your load about a third of the way into the video if you have to ask what has changed in Sweden. So clean up and watch it again with your hands our of your shorts and pay attention.
You're right that I didn't watch the video, I can't see them on internet explorer.
That's why I went looking for some big change to Swedish government or policy on the interwebz. Finding nothing (the Social Democrats and the Greens control a "minority government") I asked you.
As for the rest, Sweden is demonstrably (1) democratic, (2) solvent, (3) successful.
So what's gunna change?
Then shut the fuck up then already.
No. My very first response in this thread was to your bullshit saying that we can't have nice things because we spend lots of money on foreign policy stuff. I pointed out that the Swedes actually spend comparable amounts on foreign policy stuff (per capita) because they have to pay the freight for their defense as a non-NATO member country and they actually put a decent amount (again, per capita) into their foreign aid budget.
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
Translated as I think I fucking know everything and don't need to actually pay attention to the subject at hand because I think I'm really cheeky and a handful of libtards really like me.
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
Right, but money isn't real. They are Sweden. Everyone likes them. There will be no issues.
Comments
He done.
I don't need to watch a video to know that.
You never did tell me what changed in Sweden that made them even more socialist-y
So Sweden pays more than the US does for defense and foreign aid and all that stuff eh??? Everyone knows you're full retard on that.
If you invested the 1/10 of the time to watch the video than continue to shitpoast, you would realize that your vaunted Sweden has a new leader who doubled down on Socialism recently and that the bills have not come due yet.
Your about as useful as a fuckin Hondo these days. So get back to wasted my tax dollars shit posting on another subject that you think you know about.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/government-debt-to-gdp
Sweden's debt to GDP is half of the US. So when these bills come due they will still be better off than the US.
Some people are doing that.