Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How would you define doog?

1…89111314…18

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,293
    Southerndawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    haie said:

    Oregon is our NW rival. The hate is there on both sides. Both programs have had success.

    WSU is not a rival. They suck ass. Then they make claims about how Oregon has dominated us to refute this point, as if it's even close to the same situation. Aggy schools are just happy to be Power 5. They are no ones rival.

    SC is our true rival, and really the rival of the entire conference. I don't care if the feeling is mutual or not. They are the team you want to beat 17-12 in their own empty stadium.

    USC doesn't give a shit about us. Their rivals are Notre Dame and the other schools in Cali.

    WSU, as stated is a total joke and only counts as a rival because they are in Washington.

    Oregon is our main rival. Neither fan base likes the other. The series is competitive. The biggest doogs here are the ones who are so threatened by Oregon that they can't admit to being their rival.

    I'll take Things the doogliest of the Doogs say for $400 Alex.
    Calling Oregon our rival drives coogs crazy. Worth it for that alone imo
    I just think it's cute that a school that you've beat 3 times the last 2 duckades is considered a rival. But then again Army is Navy's rival as well. So you might be onto something.
    If being a rival depends on success then the coogs still aren't our rival

    Hope this helps
    Agreed. Oregon is now our rival.
    Oregon has always been a border "rival", but when the Huskies have had it dialed in, USC has always been the mark.

    UW vs UO 59-45-5
    UW vs USC 29-51-4 ... fucking ouch.

    I don't know what "always" means in your world, but 29-51-4, along with 50 other measures I could cite, tell me we? you? they? aren't very close to the mark.

    I don't think you need to be 50/50 to have a rivalry ... but it needs to be a little closer, and you have to actually dislike your rival.

    You skin-flute playing doogs LOVE SC. And SC LOVES you, like most of us love a Golden Retriever. What's not to love?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,293
    Mosster47 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    haie said:

    Oregon is our NW rival. The hate is there on both sides. Both programs have had success.

    WSU is not a rival. They suck ass. Then they make claims about how Oregon has dominated us to refute this point, as if it's even close to the same situation. Aggy schools are just happy to be Power 5. They are no ones rival.

    SC is our true rival, and really the rival of the entire conference. I don't care if the feeling is mutual or not. They are the team you want to beat 17-12 in their own empty stadium.

    USC doesn't give a shit about us. Their rivals are Notre Dame and the other schools in Cali.

    WSU, as stated is a total joke and only counts as a rival because they are in Washington.

    Oregon is our main rival. Neither fan base likes the other. The series is competitive. The biggest doogs here are the ones who are so threatened by Oregon that they can't admit to being their rival.

    I'll take Things the doogliest of the Doogs say for $400 Alex.
    Calling Oregon our rival drives coogs crazy. Worth it for that alone imo
    Also it's true.
    That's true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,293
    salemcoog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    haie said:

    Oregon is our NW rival. The hate is there on both sides. Both programs have had success.

    WSU is not a rival. They suck ass. Then they make claims about how Oregon has dominated us to refute this point, as if it's even close to the same situation. Aggy schools are just happy to be Power 5. They are no ones rival.

    SC is our true rival, and really the rival of the entire conference. I don't care if the feeling is mutual or not. They are the team you want to beat 17-12 in their own empty stadium.

    USC doesn't give a shit about us. Their rivals are Notre Dame and the other schools in Cali.

    WSU, as stated is a total joke and only counts as a rival because they are in Washington.

    Oregon is our main rival. Neither fan base likes the other. The series is competitive. The biggest doogs here are the ones who are so threatened by Oregon that they can't admit to being their rival.

    I'll take Things the doogliest of the Doogs say for $400 Alex.
    Exhibit A.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    creepycoug said:

    Gladstone said:

    I always thought of doogs as the angry militant pollyanna types who would attack anyone who questioned the AD, questioned the coaching, had standards that weren't being met, etc etc. Someone like Section14aFS. Someone who posted fallacious arguments like "why don't you put the headset on then big guy if coaching is so easy" or "we were 0-12 five years ago and you expect us to come within 30 points of Oregon? You aren't a true Husky fan." I didn't always think being a doog and being a homer were the same things, although their creative lines did blur at times.

    Yes. Yours is as good a definition as any. I think homer is a broader term, and doogs are an annoying subset of said term.

    Oregon needn't be an obsession to qualify as a doog, but most doogs are Oregon-obsessed.

    Think royotis, who one time started threads comparing Seattle and Portland, and then Washington and Oregon, and argued for months, on a point by point basis mind you, trying to "prove" Washington, the state, was more beautiful than Oregon.

    What can I tell you? They're a stupid bunch. Your militant program fan is a good focus for identifying these people.

    Think about the frat guy who is just a little too enthusiastic about "the house". Same dood.

    Section14A is a really good example.

    Well done.
    I hate our? Fans.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Pitchfork51 said:

    Sc cares about notre Dame and UCLA.

    And Stanford, strangely enough.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    Southerndawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    PurpleJ said:

    haie said:

    Oregon is our NW rival. The hate is there on both sides. Both programs have had success.

    WSU is not a rival. They suck ass. Then they make claims about how Oregon has dominated us to refute this point, as if it's even close to the same situation. Aggy schools are just happy to be Power 5. They are no ones rival.

    SC is our true rival, and really the rival of the entire conference. I don't care if the feeling is mutual or not. They are the team you want to beat 17-12 in their own empty stadium.

    USC doesn't give a shit about us. Their rivals are Notre Dame and the other schools in Cali.

    WSU, as stated is a total joke and only counts as a rival because they are in Washington.

    Oregon is our main rival. Neither fan base likes the other. The series is competitive. The biggest doogs here are the ones who are so threatened by Oregon that they can't admit to being their rival.

    I'll take Things the doogliest of the Doogs say for $400 Alex.
    Calling Oregon our rival drives coogs crazy. Worth it for that alone imo
    I just think it's cute that a school that you've beat 3 times the last 2 duckades is considered a rival. But then again Army is Navy's rival as well. So you might be onto something.
    If being a rival depends on success then the coogs still aren't our rival

    Hope this helps
    Agreed. Oregon is now our rival.
    Oregon has always been a border "rival", but when the Huskies have had it dialed in, USC has always been the mark.

    UW vs UO 59-45-5
    UW vs USC 29-51-4 ... fucking ouch.

    I don't know what "always" means in your world, but 29-51-4, along with 50 other measures I could cite, tell me we? you? they? aren't very close to the mark.

    I don't think you need to be 50/50 to have a rivalry ... but it needs to be a little closer, and you have to actually dislike your rival.

    You skin-flute playing doogs LOVE SC. And SC LOVES you, like most of us love a Golden Retriever. What's not to love?

    Huh? Can you read? I wrote that Oregon has always been UW's border rival, a true statement. Simple fact. Bad blood and though 59-45-5 is not 50/50, it's close enough. That was the point.

    If you can fucking read you'll realize that I didn't write that USC has always been our? rival. I wrote that they have always been the mark when the Huskies are dialed in. Simple fact, SC sets the standard for the conference. When the Huskies suck, USC doesn't matter, there is usually way too much separation under those circumstances. But when the Huskies matter, USC is almost always the measuring stick, by far the best program in the conference and one that has historically kicked our? ass. 29-51-4 .. that's a fucking ouch ... not a fucking rival.

    And by the way, USC kicks your cane's ass in all meaningful measures as well, so fuck off, Miami fag ;-) ... even lowly UW is 2 -1 vs Miami, so go back to your hole and enjoy another decade of irrelevance looking up at FSU and Clemson while Mark "also ran" Richt keeps you? mired in mediocrity. So there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter