Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm excited for the return to the 80s

1356789

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,610 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    doogie said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

    image
    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
    We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?


    #fakeoutrage
    I don't like it. because unlike you I'm not married to a political god and agree with everything he says and does.

    your republican butt buddies in congress loved it too
    Oh yes you are!
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    You sound like a huge pussy
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.

    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.
    You should probably build a bomb shelter

    And then kill yourself
    That brought me Christmas cheer.
  • Purple_Pills
    Purple_Pills Member Posts: 2,110
    2001400ex said:



    We have enough nukes to destroy the entire world. Literally. Why do we need more? And why do we need to threaten the use of them? Threatening the use of nukes is the opposite of "sanity and global understanding from our leadership". If you haven't been paying attention, our enemy isn't a state, it's rogue idiots with which a nuke won't help.

    Your stupidity is astonishing.

    Your ignorance is unastonishing. The whole point of modernizing our nuclear capabilities is to be strong enough never to have to use said capabilities.

    If you haven't been paying attention, Russia has invaded its neighbors, China is flexing its muscles with war games, star wars, and construction of artificial islands in the middle of the South China Sea to further project power, then you have rogue states like the Norks and Iran (who also have been actively invading others in its region) and their nuclear ambition. Obama's foreign policy was inept at best and has led to us to this point where we have to greatly build up our military.
  • Purple_Pills
    Purple_Pills Member Posts: 2,110
    dhdawg said:


    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

    No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.



  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:


    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

    No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.



    We spend more for worse outcomes. I don't think that is superior
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,610 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:


    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

    No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.



    We spend more for worse outcomes. I don't think that is superior
    If we spent more previously why is this costing TRILLIONS?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:


    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

    No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.



    We spend more for worse outcomes. I don't think that is superior
    If we spent more previously why is this costing TRILLIONS?
    Because you believe fake news. The deficit is 1/3 now of what it was in Bush's last budget. How can it cost us trillions?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Washington Post, CNN ABC NBC and more have all been exposed generating and perpetuating the fake news phenomenon.

    This must be what you are referring to.