Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm excited for the return to the 80s

2456789

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,476 Founders Club
    Ironic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Purple_Pills said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

    image

    You sycophants can feel free to remove Donald's cock from your mouths and come to your own conclusions any day now. Quit fear mongering.

    Speaking of the 80's...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited December 2016
    Purple_Pills said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    and if other countries see the US and Russia loading up, they will say the same thing. but keep fearmongering
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Purple_Pills said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

    image
    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    dhdawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Purple_Pills said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

    image
    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
    You only worry about how we pay for things when it involves helping people. If it involves killing people there's always money.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited December 2016
    dhdawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Purple_Pills said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

    image
    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
    We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?


    #fakeoutrage
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited December 2016
    doogie said:

    dhdawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Purple_Pills said:

    2001400ex said:



    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.
    The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

    image
    the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

    and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
    We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?


    #fakeoutrage
    I don't like it. because unlike you I'm not married to a political god and agree with everything he says and does.

    your republican butt buddies in congress loved it too
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited December 2016
    but Twitter, from a man with no power, has you in a snit as you gloss over what an actual President chose to sign into LAW today while no one was watching, a law with far greater immediate arms race risks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    but Twitter, from a man with no power, has you in a snit as you gloss over what an actual President chose to sign into LAW today while no one was watching, a law with far greater immediate arms race risks

    I know exactly what he signed into law. It's right on the front page of Yahoo. Where do you even get this shit that "no one was watching".

    And yes Trump says it as president elect, it can move markets or invoke a response from Russia or China. You have to be a special kind of stupid to think Trump has no power.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,573 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.

    If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

    Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.
    Not when Odoofis let the Russians steam roll him and are building lots of nukes with uranium Hillary got them the mining rights to (Uranium One) here in our country after they donated large sums to the Clinton foundation. Allowing Iran to have nukes etc.

    You say Trump supporters will by no matter what? Ironic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter