I'm excited for the return to the 80s

2001400ex

Who didn't like the cold war and arms race.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/let-it-be-an-arms-race-trump-doubles-down-on-nuclear-proliferation-153229263.html

doogie

Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.

PurpleThrobber

The 80s were awesome and we were oblivious to the ongoing tension between the US and USSR. One simply didn't live their life and every waking moment in fear of what might happen.

Snowflakes need to unplug for awhile, figure out how to make some incredible music and party like it 2099. Taking all this shit way too serious all the time.

Sledog

Yes the 80's. Booming economy, rebuilding of a devastated military and the collapse of the Soviet Union without firing a shot. Ronnie Raygun as president fixing the Dem's debacles and setting the world back on track.

Everything you want with little of the liberal bullshit!

2001400ex

doogie said:

Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.

You should probably build a bomb shelter

And then kill yourself

Purple_Pills

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

doogie

I've learned a long time ago not to read any of the manipulative #fakenews you post.

Now you want me to invest in snowflake theory by some butthurt loser?

2001400ex

doogie said:

I've learned a long time ago not to read any of the manipulative #fakenews you post.

Now you want me to invest in snowflake theory by some butthurt loser?

With Trump you don't need fake news, you just read his tweets.

doogie

His tweets are the news dumbass

2001400ex

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

We have enough nukes to destroy the entire world. Literally. Why do we need more? And why do we need to threaten the use of them? Threatening the use of nukes is the opposite of "sanity and global understanding from our leadership". If you haven't been paying attention, our enemy isn't a state, it's rogue idiots with which a nuke won't help.

Your stupidity is astonishing.

RaceBannon

Ironic

UWhuskytskeet

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.



You sycophants can feel free to remove Donald's cock from your mouths and come to your own conclusions any day now. Quit fear mongering.

Speaking of the 80's...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0

dhdawg

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

and if other countries see the US and Russia loading up, they will say the same thing. but keep fearmongering

dhdawg

UWhuskytskeet said:

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

allpurpleallgold

dhdawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

You only worry about how we pay for things when it involves helping people. If it involves killing people there's always money.

doogie

dhdawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?


#fakeoutrage

dhdawg

doogie said:

dhdawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Purple_Pills said:

2001400ex said:

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.

The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.

the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.

and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?

We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?


#fakeoutrage

I don't like it. because unlike you I'm not married to a political god and agree with everything he says and does.

your republican butt buddies in congress loved it too

doogie

but Twitter, from a man with no power, has you in a snit as you gloss over what an actual President chose to sign into LAW today while no one was watching, a law with far greater immediate arms race risks

2001400ex

doogie said:

but Twitter, from a man with no power, has you in a snit as you gloss over what an actual President chose to sign into LAW today while no one was watching, a law with far greater immediate arms race risks

I know exactly what he signed into law. It's right on the front page of Yahoo. Where do you even get this shit that "no one was watching".

And yes Trump says it as president elect, it can move markets or invoke a response from Russia or China. You have to be a special kind of stupid to think Trump has no power.

Sledog

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.

If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?

Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.

Not when Odoofis let the Russians steam roll him and are building lots of nukes with uranium Hillary got them the mining rights to (Uranium One) here in our country after they donated large sums to the Clinton foundation. Allowing Iran to have nukes etc.

You say Trump supporters will by no matter what? Ironic.