Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Yet another prominent (R) for Clinton, says Trump is a national embarrassment, list grows every day

1356

Comments

  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,988
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    "Oh, he told a lady with a crying baby to leave his rally, that means he's going to bankrupt our country and let the Russians invade!"

    Nope. The reason people give for believing he could bankrupt the country is that he has already bankrupt 6 businesses, and welched on his debts to numerous working people that he owned money to before those business filed for bankruptcy protection for their debts.
    This isn't a smart way to look at it. How many businesses has he owned? How many didn't go bankrupt? Were other people in the same industry going bankrupt too?

    This is the equivalent at pulling up Hillary's stock portfolio, which is likely well-diversified, and then pointing to the few instances of failing stocks and saying "See? Hillary doesn't know what the fuck she's doing. She can't even invest in the stock market properly."

    Seriously, that is the exact same argument.
    Picking a losing stock as part of a diversified portfolio is very different than running your businesses so poorly that 6 of them went bankrupt.

    Two prominent billionaires have already criticized him for it. I mention this last part only because some of you guys seem to be really impressed by billionaires.
    Of course they are different. One is a stock, the other is a company. But that's not what we're looking at. The comparison is valid in terms of who is responsible, and whether or not we should be looking at just one piece or the entire picture.

    In other words, if you're going to try and make the argument that Trump sucks at running businesses, you have to look at EVERYTHING. You don't point to the games that John Wooden's UCLA teams lost and say "see, Wooden sucks at coaching".
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    "Oh, he told a lady with a crying baby to leave his rally, that means he's going to bankrupt our country and let the Russians invade!"

    Nope. The reason people give for believing he could bankrupt the country is that he has already bankrupt 6 businesses, and welched on his debts to numerous working people that he owned money to before those business filed for bankruptcy protection for their debts.
    This isn't a smart way to look at it. How many businesses has he owned? How many didn't go bankrupt? Were other people in the same industry going bankrupt too?

    This is the equivalent at pulling up Hillary's stock portfolio, which is likely well-diversified, and then pointing to the few instances of failing stocks and saying "See? Hillary doesn't know what the fuck she's doing. She can't even invest in the stock market properly."

    Seriously, that is the exact same argument.
    Picking a losing stock as part of a diversified portfolio is very different than running your businesses so poorly that 6 of them went bankrupt.

    Two prominent billionaires have already criticized him for it. I mention this last part only because some of you guys seem to be really impressed by billionaires.
    Of course they are different. One is a stock, the other is a company. But that's not what we're looking at. The comparison is valid in terms of who is responsible, and whether or not we should be looking at just one piece or the entire picture.

    In other words, if you're going to try and make the argument that Trump sucks at running businesses, you have to look at EVERYTHING. You don't point to the games that John Wooden's UCLA teams lost and say "see, Wooden sucks at coaching".
    You must be new here.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    "Oh, he told a lady with a crying baby to leave his rally, that means he's going to bankrupt our country and let the Russians invade!"

    Nope. The reason people give for believing he could bankrupt the country is that he has already bankrupt 6 businesses, and welched on his debts to numerous working people that he owned money to before those business filed for bankruptcy protection for their debts.
    This isn't a smart way to look at it. How many businesses has he owned? How many didn't go bankrupt? Were other people in the same industry going bankrupt too?

    This is the equivalent at pulling up Hillary's stock portfolio, which is likely well-diversified, and then pointing to the few instances of failing stocks and saying "See? Hillary doesn't know what the fuck she's doing. She can't even invest in the stock market properly."

    Seriously, that is the exact same argument.
    Picking a losing stock as part of a diversified portfolio is very different than running your businesses so poorly that 6 of them went bankrupt.

    Two prominent billionaires have already criticized him for it. I mention this last part only because some of you guys seem to be really impressed by billionaires.
    Of course they are different. One is a stock, the other is a company. But that's not what we're looking at. The comparison is valid in terms of who is responsible, and whether or not we should be looking at just one piece or the entire picture.

    In other words, if you're going to try and make the argument that Trump sucks at running businesses, you have to look at EVERYTHING. You don't point to the games that John Wooden's UCLA teams lost and say "see, Wooden sucks at coaching".
    Losing a game in basketball, or picking a stock that underperforms the S&P500, are vastly different than running a business so poorly that it declares bankruptcy.

    You can run a business poorly, but have a small profit and pay your obligations.

    But running it so poorly that you declare bankruptcy, is like saying "fuck, I'm in way over my head here, I can't even afford to pay my debts. Gov't, please help me get of of my debts".

    When Trump gets in way over his head with the US, who is going to bail him out?
  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,988
    Think of the federal budget as Trump's personal budget. There are many sources of revenue, and many sources of expenditures.

    Perhaps there will be one area where too much money is being spent, but as long as overall revenues and expenses are looking good, things are golden....just like Trump's individual situation. He individually has NOT declared bankruptcy, because he's managed the bigger picture well enough to not need to.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    Think of the federal budget as Trump's personal budget. There are many sources of revenue, and many sources of expenditures.

    Perhaps there will be one area where too much money is being spent, but as long as overall revenues and expenses are looking good, things are golden....just like Trump's individual situation. He individually has NOT declared bankruptcy, because he's managed the bigger picture well enough to not need to.

    Whatever, we will not agree on his competence.

    But at least you have stopped conflating his ability to run the country without it going bankrupt, with him kicking a crying baby out of the conference, which is where this entire thread started.

    So, you are getting slightly better in your analytical ability. Enough to impress Race anyway, which might not be saying much.


  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Think of the federal budget as Trump's personal budget. There are many sources of revenue, and many sources of expenditures.

    Perhaps there will be one area where too much money is being spent, but as long as overall revenues and expenses are looking good, things are golden....just like Trump's individual situation. He individually has NOT declared bankruptcy, because he's managed the bigger picture well enough to not need to.

    So you're saying Trump is going to raise taxes?

    He hasn't proposed any spending cuts.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Peterman said:

    I find it funny that Donald will be the first man in the history of this country to lose a presidential election to a woman heh heh heh

    Technically speaking he would be the third. Martin O'Malley and Bernie Sanders should set themselves on fire.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    Peterman said:

    I find it funny that Donald will be the first man in the history of this country to lose a presidential election to a woman heh heh heh

    Technically speaking he would be the third. Martin O'Malley and Bernie Sanders should set themselves on fire.
    Given how rigged the DNC was against Sanders, I think he did pretty fucking well.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    OZONE said:

    Peterman said:

    I find it funny that Donald will be the first man in the history of this country to lose a presidential election to a woman heh heh heh

    Technically speaking he would be the third. Martin O'Malley and Bernie Sanders should set themselves on fire.
    Given how rigged the DNC was against Sanders, I think he did pretty fucking well.
    Losing by 13 points is special.

    Sincerely,
    Doogs for the past dozen years.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    edited August 2016
    Not a great analogy, unless you admit that every ref in the game was doing everything they could to hand the win to one specific team.

    Sure, Clinton's team still had to execute some plays, but all the holding calls and offsides calls were going against the Sanders team for a reason.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    OZONE said:

    Not a great analogy, unless you admit that every ref in the game was doing everything they could to hand the win to one specific team.

    Losers lose and then blame the refs for losing.
  • OZONEOZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    Not a great analogy, unless you admit that every ref in the game was doing everything they could to hand the win to one specific team.

    Losers lose and then blame the refs for losing.
    I don't care. I'm still right.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,569 Founders Club
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Not a great analogy, unless you admit that every ref in the game was doing everything they could to hand the win to one specific team.

    Losers lose and then blame the refs for losing.
    I don't care. I'm still right.
    Yep
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,569 Founders Club

    In this thread: Race and OZONE finally fuck

    I like Ozone. He's one of my favorite classy posters
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    In this thread: Race and OZONE finally fuck

    I like Ozone. He's one of my favorite classy posters
    Fuck off. I thought I was your favorite.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    "According to Bloomberg, 8 out of 10 entrepreneurs who start businesses fail within the first 18 months. A whopping 80% crash and burn."

    So, some Hillary eunuchs need to get some fucking perspective. Trump's been in the hospitality, development, recreation and casino businesses. It takes huge sums of money to get those off the ground and the risks are huge. Do you Hillary fuckbrains really think his investors don't know the risks? Christ. Bankruptcy is part of any businesses survival or closure plan from day one, if the entrepreneur has any brains at all. Form a corp or llc, and if it fails, dump it into bankruptcy. Business 101.

    BTW, I'm in my 20th year and going strong, so fuck all you faggots who think you can lecture me about Trump or finance. Bankrupting a poor performing venture is much better than letting it bleed you dry to your last penny, costing you your house, all your shit, and causing you to re-start from zero. Nobody with a brain is that stupid, and that's why the founding fathers put bankruptcy in the constitution and many of them resorted to it themselves. All thus faux outrage is a joke. Trump's a blowhard and a jackass, yet, I find him less intolerable and offensive than most of the leftist commies and hypocrites I encounter daily.
Sign In or Register to comment.