Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Has ISIS Infiltrated Homeland Security? Orlando Terrorist Worked for Major DHS Contractor
Comments
-
So by your rationale, anyone that wants them, should have the right to Tanks, RPG's, armed drowns, F-18's and so on, if they can afford them. Because afterall, the military has them and so the citizenry can overthrow the government,teh should have them too.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
That's the stupidest shit I've ever heard.
If I had only one wish today, it would that your internet service to the bunker would be cut off, so Ididn't have to reply to that sack of shit of a post and more like them.
-
Goddell is a liar and a coward. Not responding to your post. Just throwing that out there.salemcoog said:
It's a good thng that Roger Goodell wasn't the Commish back then or they would have been sanctioned on the spot until all th esudden they weren't and then were again,PurpleJ said:
The British should have branded the Patriots as terrorists and seized their guns after the tragic mass shooting in Boston.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution. -
Likes to prove the other guy's point through sheer stupidity.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
Doesn't understand sarcasm through sheer stupidity.PurpleJ said:
Likes to prove the other guy's point through sheer stupidity.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH -
I know you weren't being sarcastic, but you weren't being sarcastic.2001400ex said:
Doesn't understand sarcasm through sheer stupidity.PurpleJ said:
Likes to prove the other guy's point through sheer stupidity.2001400ex said:
Molotov cocktails are illegal.Sledog said:
They didn't include TV, Cable or the Internet in the 1st amendment either so you should have no free speech on any platform other than the town square.salemcoog said:
And clearly our founding fathers intent was to protect the citizens right to own 100 rd banana clips and semi auto weapons. Even the rights of those with tries to terrorists that are major threats to Society.2001400ex said:
First, who said I'm a liberal? Second, pro choice is not the same as killing babies. Third, I've never discussed my views on abortion here.Sledog said:
Liberal's are mostly pro choice, correct?2001400ex said:
I'm not sure I've ever supported killing babies. That just sounds mean, but whatever.Sledog said:
Every American legally eligible to do so wouldn't bother me in the least. An Armed society is a polite society!2001400ex said:
Right. So let's just arm every American. Because of Paris.Sledog said:
Gun laws don't work. I wish more liberal idiots would figure it out seems you just stumbled on it. France has really strict gun laws. How'd that work out in Paris? Bad guys get guns. Odd how the shitbag in question doesn't represent every muslim but he represents every gun owner.2001400ex said:
You guess? He did buy the guns in the last week after being on the watch list. Wonder what could have stopped him from buying the guns???Sledog said:
I guess he could buy one after being investigated by the FBI just like Hillary can run for president while being investigated for federal felonies by the FBI.2001400ex said:
Yet they can still buy guns. Despite a bill in Congress trying to stop them.Sledog said:There are 73 employees of TSA on the terrorist watch list. So yeah I'd say they're working on it!
Odd for me to be arguing gun control with people who think it's OK to kill babies.
Our society is armed. There are some practical things we can do without taking one gun away from one American, that can help reduce these shootings. But there are too many people like you scared about gun control. For no reason.
No reason? The 2nd Amendment guarantees the other amendments. No 2nd no constitution. It's the teeth of the constitution. A government should fear the people not the other way around. The 2nd intends the people to be similarly armed and equipped to the military as the people are in fact the militia. Read Scalia on the Heller case decision.
Any politician wanting to disarm the populace has evil intentions. Arms are why we are citizens and not subjects. Remember that on April 19th 1775 the British were marching to seize the colonist arms and powder stores. Gun control led to the shot heard 'round the world and the American Revolution. I wonder if it could happen again? Not sure there are enough actual Americans left.
Fourth, there is no politician asking to "disarm the populace".
And lastly, there's no gun a citizen can have that can do any damage to the military if they were to come knocking on your door.
HTH
I'm sure that's the spirit of the Amendment to the Constitution.
Their intent was that the public/militia be similarly armed to the military on an individual basis so that the government could be overthrown whenever it got out of control. They expected to have a revolution every 10-20 years.
You could own your own cannon and explosives when they wrote it as well. Machine guns were legal until 1932 when gangsters were killing each other with them and they were controlled. Another unconstitutional law.
Of course I do know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
An ISIS dude in France just stabbed a policeman to death and tortured and killed the policeman's wife live on YouTube and would have killed the child as well if police didn't shoot him. Banning knives today are we? Strange how if the crime involves a gun we should ban the gun but the criminal is blamed in all other instances. The guy in tossing the Molotov into the crowded bar in NY (IIRC) killed close to 90 people so shall we outlaw flammable liquids and glass?
HTH
-
Sledog has gun rights dialed in
-
I want an attack helicopter.
I could take care of some motherfuckers.................. -
This thread is gayer than the Pulse.
-
PM to Hondo
-
Looks like Ballfag survived Orlando
