Moar Rape Cultue - Epidemic Levels
Comments
-
Hell yeah - the only thing better than FREE PUB is FREE MONEY!dflea said:pawz said:
Keeping going down that slippery slope and everything in life is imagined.dflea said:The placebo effect was named because people are so good at telling which effects are real and which are imagined.
In fact, they're so good at it that expensive sugar pills work better than cheap sugar pills at treating their ills.
Which it is. If you're a solipsist. Or a mystic.
l can tell you from personal experience, when I take on a vegetarian diet, particularly a vegan one sans sugar, salt, and processed foods, I can feel the difference in every cell of my body. And I have more REAL energy than I know what to do with.
I know you like to kill supper, which is cool. But if you were able to maintain a plant-based diet for a couple weeks or more, you would would feel a difference in every fiber of your being - which you would be convinced is not merely placebo.
Simple fact.
The slippery slope you're standing on is you slipping your way to being a complete dumbfuck.
The placebo effect is real and measurable - your faggot "I feel better" feelings are in your stupid head.
I get it - you hate science and evidence, and you love feelings. The DNC will be calling you for a donation soon.
-
Thanks. Just for the record, I keep em over drinking age these days.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You're a femanist tard Gold. Marshall is one of our most valued posters. Whether he likes a good physical fuckins with a 17 year old or not.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Because I don't sound like feminazis whining on college campuses? Jesus Christ...allpurpleallgold said:Honestly Bill, that reads like you've raped a girl.
Besides a no, I haven't, nor will I, I won't dignify this with any further response.
-
dflea said:
I'll ask you AGAIN about this "skyrocketing" birth defect rate.
Do tell - then show how it is related to diet and not the increased age of women having babies.
I'm glad you brought up diet. This nutritional biochemist from Cornell spent a career studying the correlation on this subject and published a 30-year project called The China Study, one of the top-selling books on nutrition ever.
It is also a fact that the US Government is paying out claims for vaccine cases that were able to prove a direct association with autism.
The truth is, there could be any number of causes for the rise in birth defect rates. But the ones with the most to lose - GMO's, big pharma, vaccine-pharma, animal protein producers, and processed food makers - don't want us to look. And they spend a lot of money insuring we don't.
We need real answers. Without sacred cows.
-
RIP, @IrishDawg22pawz said:dflea said:I'll ask you AGAIN about this "skyrocketing" birth defect rate.
Do tell - then show how it is related to diet and not the increased age of women having babies.
I'm glad you brought up diet. This nutritional biochemist from Cornell spent a career studying the correlation on this subject and published a 30-year project called The China Study, one of the top-selling books on nutrition ever.
It is also a fact that the US Government is paying out claims for vaccine cases that were able to prove a direct association with autism.
The truth is, there could be any number of causes for the rise in birth defect rates. But the ones with the most to lose - GMO's, big pharma, vaccine-pharma, animal protein producers, and processed food makers - don't want us to look. And they spend a lot of money insuring we don't.
We need real answers. Without sacred cows.
-
pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now. -
The current autism rate, per the CDC - 1 in 68.dflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
The following graphs show how the rate in autism was in the neighborhood of 1 in 2000 children.
The biggest take-away from these graphs is that the meteoric rise in autism rates begins right around the time vaccine makers were able to garner legal immunity - 1986. Could this be coincidence? Sure. And to be fair, GMO food comes on strong in the mid-70's. Either way, Occam's Razor would like to have a word ....
wsj.com/articles/SB123535050056344903
What is actually studied when the establishment tells us everything is safe? The way these issues are currently studied, does it appear to have the scientific rigidity you require? Are they even asking the right questions?
fourteenstudies.org/history.html
What is actually true?
-- Of 11 vaccines licensed for children (all given multiple times), only a single vaccine -- the MMR -- has been studied for its relationship to autism. This would be like trying to identify the source of a plane crash, suspecting mechanical failure, solely analyzing one of the wings, and then declaring the entire airplane free of culpability.
-- A vaccine ingredient, thimerosal, which is comprised of mercury, has also been studied, but solely in the context of vaccinated children. Often, the studies on thimerosal compare children who received various levels of thimerosal in their vaccines, rather than none.
-- No studies have ever considered unvaccinated children to compare their autism rates to those who receive vaccines.
-- No studies consider the real world and how vaccines are actually given. American children receive 6-7 vaccines simultaneously at their 2, 4, and 6 month "well baby" visits, but no science done comes close to replicating this real world condition.
Looks legit to me.dflea said:
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_China_Study
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China-Cornell-Oxford_Project
The book is loosely based on the China-Cornell-Oxford Project, a 20-year study – described by The New York Times as "the Grand Prix of epidemiology" – conducted by the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Cornell University and the University of Oxford. T. Colin Campbell was one of the study's directors.[9] It looked at mortality rates from cancer and other chronic diseases from 1973–75 in 65 counties in China; the data was correlated with 1983–84 dietary surveys and blood work from 100 people in each county. The research was conducted in those counties because they had genetically similar populations that tended, over generations, to live and eat in the same way in the same place. The study concluded that counties with a high consumption of animal-based foods in 1983–84 were more likely to have had higher death rates from "Western" diseases as of 1973–75, while the opposite was true for counties that ate more plant foods.[10]dflea said:
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
Contrary to popular opinion I see myself more pragmatist than moralist. HTH
In conclusion, I'm nowhere near the conspiracy camp that this is some sort of pre-determined means for population control. I do believe this came about from best intentions.
Nonetheless, if this trend isn't stopped and given its exponential rate of growth, the die-off in our population over the next 150 years will dwarf the Greatest Epidemics in Human History.
. -
uh huh... now overlay that graph with a graph that shows when bad Husky football started. I think *somebody* is gonna be sir prized.
-
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now. -
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now. -
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now. -
How many wheelbarrows full of Marks would you like?dnc said:
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now. -
The over/under is 5pawz said:
How many wheelbarrows full of Marks would you like?dnc said:
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now.
-
dnc said:
The over/under is 5pawz said:
How many wheelbarrows full of Marks would you like?dnc said:
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now.
1 wheelbarrow = 1 loaf of breaddnc said:
The over/under is 5pawz said:
How many wheelbarrows full of Marks would you like?dnc said:
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now.
I hope this helps. -
That's outrageous! We should really do something about that.pawz said:dnc said:
The over/under is 5pawz said:
How many wheelbarrows full of Marks would you like?dnc said:
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now.
1 wheelbarrow = 1 loaf of breaddnc said:
The over/under is 5pawz said:
How many wheelbarrows full of Marks would you like?dnc said:
japawz said:
Do you take German Marks circa 1923?dnc said:
fucking thisdflea said:pawz,
Just document this "skyrocketing" rate of birth defects, then we can talk about the possible causes of the not-really-skyrocketing-at-all rate of birth defects.
Was the Cornell prof's study a peer-reviewed double-blind study with a control group? Or was it a study that confirmed your feeling about the subject so now you're holding it up as an example of solid science?
You know what people that live into their 90's have in common? The genes that allow you to live into your 90's. They aren't vegans, they don't avoid gluten, and they don't wet the bed about bullshit that can't be proven by any kind of valid study.
You eat what you want, though. If a tofu burger gets you going, then eat two. I don't really give a shit as long as you don't start in next with the "animal cruelty" phase of being a fuckin' vegan.
And send some money to dnc - he's expecting it now.
I hope this helps.
-
Link?pawz said:
FACT: In 1989 Congress passed a law giving prosecutorial and civil immunity to pharmaceutical vaccination companies. In Engrish, neither you or the federal government can sue them, for any reason.RaceBannon said:There are two problems with the vaccine conspiracy.
Big pharmacy makes more money treating diseases than preventing them.
If they wanted to pull off a scam it would be far safer from a liability position to give placebos than to poison kids with mercury and aluminum.
Now if you want to think that the medical pharmaceutical conglomerate would hold back cures so they can treat and medicate diseases for years, you would have a plausible financial reward for that
-
www.davidicke.comTheGlove said:
Link?pawz said:
FACT: In 1989 Congress passed a law giving prosecutorial and civil immunity to pharmaceutical vaccination companies. In Engrish, neither you or the federal government can sue them, for any reason.RaceBannon said:There are two problems with the vaccine conspiracy.
Big pharmacy makes more money treating diseases than preventing them.
If they wanted to pull off a scam it would be far safer from a liability position to give placebos than to poison kids with mercury and aluminum.
Now if you want to think that the medical pharmaceutical conglomerate would hold back cures so they can treat and medicate diseases for years, you would have a plausible financial reward for that
-
Why does Cookie Monster have a lighter up his ass?GrundleStiltzkin said:pawz said:
Disagree.dflea said:pawz said:
Keeping going down that slippery slope and everything in life is imagined.dflea said:The placebo effect was named because people are so good at telling which effects are real and which are imagined.
In fact, they're so good at it that expensive sugar pills work better than cheap sugar pills at treating their ills.
Which it is. If you're a solipsist. Or a mystic.
l can tell you from personal experience, when I take on a vegetarian diet, particularly a vegan one sans sugar, salt, and processed foods, I can feel the difference in every cell of my body. And I have more REAL energy than I know what to do with.
I know you like to kill supper, which is cool. But if you were able to maintain a plant-based diet for a couple weeks or more, you would would feel a difference in every fiber of your being - which you would be convinced is not merely placebo.
Simple fact.
The slippery slope you're standing on is you slipping your way to being a complete dumbfuck.
The placebo effect is real and measurable - your faggot "I feel better" feelings are in your stupid head.
I get it - you hate science and evidence, and you love feelings. The DNC will be calling you for a donation soon.
All I've ever wanted is more, comprehensive testing. And accountability.
In my opinion, one of the defining challenges of our generation will be the skyrocketing rate of 'birth defects.' It has to stop. I don't fucking care if it's vaccines, gmo's, pharma, meat, processed food, sugar, portable devices radiation, etc. #DefinitiveCausation.
I don't trust the profit-centers. The ones funding the entire system - including the FDA. The ones you ultimately get your information from.
The ones wagering billions with legal immunity. Hippocratic oath indeed.
All bets are on.
What I know instinctually is: when I don't partake in the aforementioned #causation, I feel fucking great.
Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food. - Hippocrates
-
Cant have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com duck, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AZ, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.TheGlove said:
Link?pawz said:
FACT: In 1989 Congress passed a law giving prosecutorial and civil immunity to pharmaceutical vaccination companies. In Engrish, neither you or the federal government can sue them, for any reason.RaceBannon said:There are two problems with the vaccine conspiracy.
Big pharmacy makes more money treating diseases than preventing them.
If they wanted to pull off a scam it would be far safer from a liability position to give placebos than to poison kids with mercury and aluminum.
Now if you want to think that the medical pharmaceutical conglomerate would hold back cures so they can treat and medicate diseases for years, you would have a plausible financial reward for that -
Because he doesn't have any pockets, dipshit.TheGlove said:
Why does Cookie Monster have a lighter up his ass?GrundleStiltzkin said:pawz said:
Disagree.dflea said:pawz said:
Keeping going down that slippery slope and everything in life is imagined.dflea said:The placebo effect was named because people are so good at telling which effects are real and which are imagined.
In fact, they're so good at it that expensive sugar pills work better than cheap sugar pills at treating their ills.
Which it is. If you're a solipsist. Or a mystic.
l can tell you from personal experience, when I take on a vegetarian diet, particularly a vegan one sans sugar, salt, and processed foods, I can feel the difference in every cell of my body. And I have more REAL energy than I know what to do with.
I know you like to kill supper, which is cool. But if you were able to maintain a plant-based diet for a couple weeks or more, you would would feel a difference in every fiber of your being - which you would be convinced is not merely placebo.
Simple fact.
The slippery slope you're standing on is you slipping your way to being a complete dumbfuck.
The placebo effect is real and measurable - your faggot "I feel better" feelings are in your stupid head.
I get it - you hate science and evidence, and you love feelings. The DNC will be calling you for a donation soon.
All I've ever wanted is more, comprehensive testing. And accountability.
In my opinion, one of the defining challenges of our generation will be the skyrocketing rate of 'birth defects.' It has to stop. I don't fucking care if it's vaccines, gmo's, pharma, meat, processed food, sugar, portable devices radiation, etc. #DefinitiveCausation.
I don't trust the profit-centers. The ones funding the entire system - including the FDA. The ones you ultimately get your information from.
The ones wagering billions with legal immunity. Hippocratic oath indeed.
All bets are on.
What I know instinctually is: when I don't partake in the aforementioned #causation, I feel fucking great.
Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food. - Hippocrates -
My mistake, it was actually 1986.TheGlove said:
Link?pawz said:
FACT: In 1989 Congress passed a law giving prosecutorial and civil immunity to pharmaceutical vaccination companies. In Engrish, neither you or the federal government can sue them, for any reason.RaceBannon said:There are two problems with the vaccine conspiracy.
Big pharmacy makes more money treating diseases than preventing them.
If they wanted to pull off a scam it would be far safer from a liability position to give placebos than to poison kids with mercury and aluminum.
Now if you want to think that the medical pharmaceutical conglomerate would hold back cures so they can treat and medicate diseases for years, you would have a plausible financial reward for that
wsj.com/articles/SB123535050056344903
And ... FO, G -
Those graphs are bullshit, pawz, and Occam's razor should be used to castrate you for being the gullible clown you are.
When we were kids, those kids were called "retards" or "special ed", or in Shelton, "Exceptional Foresters". Now they are called "autistic" because whiny parents need a diagnosis that makes them feel better - much like the ADHD diagnosis that used to be called "wild kid". No blood test or any reliable means to diagnose it, just a doctor saying it is what it is.
So now we have something to call it, and the rates are "skyrocketing". lol - fuck that.
And what kind of fucking sense does it make that the dates of correlation would be with the timing of a law protecting vaccine makers and not the giving of vaccines themselves? Did they start making really bad vaccines once protected from lawsuits? Did they add way more mercury and aluminum because they could? That kind of ridiculous paranoia is just stupid. The study that started this whole vaccine/autism link involved 8 kids - the most recent study that found no evidence of a link involved 530,000 kids.
Like it or not, you ARE in the paranoid conspiracy camp.
Like I said, you eat what you want. I'm going to eat a bunch of GMO corn chips, a sammich laden with gluten, and rely on the wonders of modern pharmaceuticals to save me.
-
I find it striking that you aren't the least bit curious, all things considered. You think an increase 5 times over is merely an issue of finally diagnosing something correctly?? W, JW.dflea said:Those graphs are bullshit
Ignorance is bliss, I guess.
That's the problem, it makes perfect, logical sense.dflea said:
And what kind of fucking sense does it make that the dates of correlation would be with the timing of a law protecting vaccine makers and not the giving of vaccines themselves? Did they start making really bad vaccines once protected from lawsuits?
One thing is for sure, they have no incentive not to rush the 'latest and greatest' to market. Consequences be damned.
I prefer to not need 'modern pharmaceuticals' in the first place. If you want to glow in the dark, be my guest.dflea said:
Like I said, you eat what you want. I'm going to eat a bunch of GMO corn chips, a sammich laden with gluten, and rely on the wonders of modern pharmaceuticals to save me.
I just wish you started paying your future health care needs up front - like each time through the McDonalds drive-thru.
-
It's not rape if it's not rape. Her own friends say she was bragging about it. Go ahead and lynch the black players though, RacistBannon.TierbsHsotBoobs said:IMO, this is a black eye for Oregon.
-
Look pawz, I'm going to make one poast here, then I'm going to go tell someone else to fuck off.
You know how many polio victims are against the polio vaccine? None of those fuckers. You know how many diabetics hate insulin. None of those fuckers, either. It's easy to be anti-vaccine-guy when your ass has been riding the coat-tails of people who did get vaccines. It's easy to be anti-pharmaceutical until you need some - and you will some day, junior. Now anti-vac dumbasses are letting diseases that could be eradicated hang around like Ty Willingham and anti-pill naturpath dumbasses like Steve Jobs are dying of treatable diseases.
Vaccines save millions of people from fucked up diseases. Do people get sick or die from them? Sure - but that's the cost of doing bid'ness. It's like airplanes -a few hundred people have to die if we're going to move 800 million people every year.
There isn't any credible evidence that vaccines cause autism, and people who don't get vaccinated are just bandwagoners.
So, in closing - fuck off.
-
There were still kids with the leg braces from polio when I was in grade school. That's why we got the big needle. TB was wasn't whipped until the 50's. People forget what a killer it was since forever
-
Can't we just get back to talking about Autzen parking lot rapes?
-
So pawz doesn't know what placebo effect or occams razor actually means. Giving d2d a run for his money.
They changed how they diagnose autism. The end. -
Oh, hey, pawz shitting all over himself again.
This should be good. -
allpurpleallgold said:
So pawz doesn't know what placebo effect or occams razor actually means. Giving d2d a run for his money.
They changed how they diagnose autism. The end.
In science, Occam's razor is used as a heuristic technique (discovery tool) to guide scientists in the development of theoretical models rather than as an arbiter between published models.[7][8] In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; the preference for simplicity in the scientific method is based on the falsifiability criterion. For each accepted explanation of a phenomenon, there is always an infinite number of possible and more complex alternatives, because one can always burden failing explanations with ad hoc hypothesis to prevent them from being falsified; therefore, simpler theories are preferable to more complex ones because they are better testable and falsifiable.[9][10][11]
So a change in diagnosis protocol explains a five-fold increase? If you say so. [citation required]
-
Lol. You think copying and pasting the defintion shows you know what it means and that you know how to use it. It doesn't and you don't.pawz said:allpurpleallgold said:So pawz doesn't know what placebo effect or occams razor actually means. Giving d2d a run for his money.
They changed how they diagnose autism. The end.
In science, Occam's razor is used as a heuristic technique (discovery tool) to guide scientists in the development of theoretical models rather than as an arbiter between published models.[7][8] In the scientific method, Occam's razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; the preference for simplicity in the scientific method is based on the falsifiability criterion. For each accepted explanation of a phenomenon, there is always an infinite number of possible and more complex alternatives, because one can always burden failing explanations with ad hoc hypothesis to prevent them from being falsified; therefore, simpler theories are preferable to more complex ones because they are better testable and falsifiable.[9][10][11]
So a change in diagnosis protocol explains a five-fold increase? If you say so. [citation required]
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/autism-prevalence-unchanged-in-20-years/
This link even comes with one of those graphs you love so much.
