Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Petersen's comments...presented without comment
Comments
-
I don't know about Saban. That guy runs an amazing fucking program. But Stoops? What the fuck? If Florida State has their leading receiver and top offensive weapon for the title game, the guy may not even have one title. I'll grant you that when he was a D coordinator he was solid in that category, and he's a damn good coach. Love to have him. But, yeah, why the fuck wouldn't I put Petersen in his category? He beat Stoops head to head in a game that mattered, and he did it with a washing machine strapped onto his back.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Does UW have Oklahoma or Alabama brand? No, of course not. Does CP need it? Not so sure. There is so much fucking talent out there, and the kids these days want to PLAY, not sit, because the really good ones view cfb as a three-year proposition at best. This is how TCU and Baylor come to exist as they do today.
Oregon has done a great job of recruiting all over the fucking place, including places in which UW has never had any real traction. I admire the fucking shit out of Oregon's boldness to basically say, "Oklahoma, Notre Dame, USC, Michigan, blah blah blah blah blah ... we're going in and we're competing against those schools wherever so fuck off if you don't like it."
Oregon laughed right back at all the royotis-type fags who laughed at them for taking a novel approach to an old problem. Washington's biggest problem, as you suggest, is that it has been so mired in this tired idea/fantasy that it has this vaunted tradition. This is where you get the "rightful place with USC" bullshit, which is, of course, patently absurd on so many levels.
I think CP is good enough to know that he doesn't need to follow the old formula. I think he's aware that if Oregon can make inroads in Texas and Florida and Louisiana, then maybe he/Washington can too.
-
My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way. -
The military does it within months all of the time. You jump out of a plane at Fort Bragg and you stand a good chance of your parachute having been rigged by some PFC on the job less than a year. Sure, the soldier is supervised by someone else ultimately accountable, but that shit is called coaching in other contexts.Tequilla said:My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.
It's not impossible to rapidly train someone to life and death levels of responsibility, it's just difficult. Charles DeGaulle had a saying, "The graveyards are full of indispensible men," meaning that you do what you must with who you have, not wallow in excuses about who ain't there.
Requiring special people or oodles of time to become highly effective in football when a roster has bright spots of talent available should be a major cause for concern. Oh well, your problem. -
Canard,
We're not talking about the military here ... we're talking about athletes.
How often do you see PROFESSIONAL players that fail to grasp the details? -
What the fuck are you blabbering about? Sounding like AoG.Canard said:
The military does it within months all of the time. You jump out of a plane at Fort Bragg and you stand a good chance of your parachute having been rigged by some PFC on the job less than a year. Sure, the soldier is supervised by someone else ultimately accountable, but that shit is called coaching in other contexts.Tequilla said:My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.
It's not impossible to rapidly train someone to life and death levels of responsibility, it's just difficult. Charles DeGaulle had a saying, "The graveyards are full of indispensible men," meaning that you do what you must with who you have, not wallow in excuses about who ain't there.
Requiring special people or oodles of time to become highly effective in football when a roster has bright spots of talent available should be a major cause for concern. Oh well, your problem. -
92-12 mostly compiled in the minors makes you a AAAA phenom, not a major league hall of fame playa. The grinds and seasonal attrition are in no way comparable between the top level and the also ran level. In many ways that matter in big boy football, CCP is next to untested.topdawgnc said:
You're a fucking donkey.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Peterman has earned the right to be in the same conversations as Saban and Stoops regarding caliber. 92-12 fucking means something in today's world. So does wins over Stoops, and Kelly.
Washington has facilities, education, and location to be a competitor. Even a donkey like you knows that ... it's the very reason you lurk around here showing your 2 inches of thunder. You know if Washington every gets serious again it could be a good rivalry. The problem is the dumb fucks who think Lockner is a good QB and Sark is a good coach ....
Pete does it week in and out going forward posting a .750+ win rate, (while also closeting the plunger that chased Sark around), and I'll be the first to recant my heresy.
But if you can't see the Sark Stank as a watery version the of Owen-12 excuse for Seven, well no helping and all. -
Too short, did read.Tequilla said:My head hurts after reading this thread ...
Biggest fucktarded statement of the day is thinking that paying attention to details is something that you can teach overnight ... just doesn't happen that way.
Tequilla, who stole your log in?
And, BTW, for once I agree. But when you make as many fucktarded statements as Canard, one of them has to be the most fucktarded. Its just math. -
Wasn't Petersen's record vs. BCS teams something like 10-3 in his time at BSU? He also had a winning record against top 25 teams. I'm just not sure how C'Tard can explain that away
-
Canard is spiraling out of control in this thread.
Did he really just compare living in barracks 24/7 training to kill to a college athlete living in dorms with practice hour restrictions, classes, and social life?
Holee Fuck. -
That's why every coach who is employed by a mid major is 92-12.Canard said:
92-12 mostly compiled in the minors makes you a AAAA phenom, not a major league hall of fame playa. The grinds and seasonal attrition are in no way comparable between the top level and the also ran level. In many ways that matter in big boy football, CPC is next to untested.topdawgnc said:
You're a fucking donkey.Canard said:
You're seriously suggesting that CP is Saban or Stoops caliber? Or that UW has the recruiting brand power for a quick move into national prominence on par with Bama or Oklahoma?topdawgnc said:Bob Stoops and Nick Saban went 7-6 his first year.
How's the marijuana grow going?
Peterman has earned the right to be in the same conversations as Saban and Stoops regarding caliber. 92-12 fucking means something in today's world. So does wins over Stoops, and Kelly.
Washington has facilities, education, and location to be a competitor. Even a donkey like you knows that ... it's the very reason you lurk around here showing your 2 inches of thunder. You know if Washington every gets serious again it could be a good rivalry. The problem is the dumb fucks who think Lockner is a good QB and Sark is a good coach ....
Pete does it week in and out going forward posting a .750+ win rate, (while also closeting the plunger that chased Sark around), and I'll be the first to recant my heresy.
But if you can't see the Sark Stank as a watery version the of Owen-12 excuse for Seven, well no helping and all.
Dude ...
You're a donkey. Quit while you're a head.
