Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

P12 Championship line going up

13468911

Comments

  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,326

    Why will there still even be conference championship games with a 12 team playoff?

    $$$$$$$$$$
  • RTD
    RTD Member Posts: 837
    PAC has no divisions but North still plays all team in the North and South is the same. It’s shit logic.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014

    Why will there still even be conference championship games with a 12 team playoff?

    $$$$$$$$$$
    And winner gets a first round bye
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,231

    Why will there still even be conference championship games with a 12 team playoff?

    $$$$$$$$$$
    Only way to determine a champ with 20 team leagues
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,460 Founders Club

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    UW did since they got hosed out of the CCG

    B1G isn't using division schedules
    They aren’t using divisions period. That’s the point. They got sick of either Michigan or Ohio St getting left off the conference title game for Iowa, Purdue, and Wisconsin.
    But not this year

    Iowa it is
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,383

    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.

    It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    edited November 2023
    whlinder said:

    The odds of two teams squaring off three times in the same season is going to be decently high. It's pretty stupid.

    It’s going to be pretty hard to make a Conf champ game and not make the playoffs in the B1G/SEC.
    Exactly. If this were next year, tOSU and Michigan are both in the playoffs. Washington and Oregon are both in. Texas and Alabama are both in. Alabama/Georgia. If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.
  • bisonduck
    bisonduck Member Posts: 715

    AOG said:

    I don't get the point of this "championship" since we? already beat the Dukx and finished first. Money? Staff, true?

    Utah didn’t complain when they had to beat Oregon twice two years ago, and then USC twice last year. Quit being and bitch a grow a pair. Win and you’re in. Don’t and you can’t finish. It is what it is. This isn’t 2011 anymore.
    Or don't lose the first game

    Tough talk when the retarded pac 12 is your only hope
    Same system in the B1G next year. Nobody said much about this when this was implemented last year.
    This game all but ensures a CFP participant. It's good for the conference and not UW this year. Imagine playing Arizona, they win, and no PAC 12 teams goes to the playoff.

    Grow a pair.
  • Seven_Eleven
    Seven_Eleven Member Posts: 124

    If Washington and Oregon somehow finish top-two in the B1G next year, it's possible they could play each other three times consecutively.

    I kinda want to see that happen, now that the prospect's been raised, just for the absurdity.