Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Recent history update

1234568

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,576 Founders Club
    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    @iDawg and I thought UW was better than UO for about the first half of the duckade

    I get it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    I was much more troubled by last year's loss than this year's loss. If we lose the Championship game 30 - 32, because our kicker misses a last second fg it's going to really suck but I'm not going to put that all on Lanning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    @iDawg and I thought UW was better than UO for about the first half of the duckade

    I get it
    If you were really head and shoulders better you would have been blowing us out by two touchdowns.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,744 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    The Sark hire was mostly hated at HHB. There was one notable HHB who celebrated it, his name has been omitted out of respect for the dead. But the majority of us(?) were staunchly against it.

    Lake, yeah most people here celebrated that shitshow.
    There was a pole on Lake, recently bumped, that showed his hiring was not universally beloved.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,554 Founders Club
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    dnc said:

    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    The Sark hire was mostly hated at HHB. There was one notable HHB who celebrated it, his name has been omitted out of respect for the dead. But the majority of us(?) were staunchly against it.

    Lake, yeah most people here celebrated that shitshow.
    There was a pole on Lake, recently bumped, that showed his hiring was not universally beloved.
    I'll admit, I was at the LSU game and clapped for "a moral victory". Then we? upset USC. I was also young, fresh out of college, and had suffered through Owen as a student.

    Learned my lesson, I was nervous about the Lake hire and full LIPO mode. LIPO undefeated.

    Anyways, this is definitely not the place that's been "all in" on just about any hire. I was still a lurker but I remember there being question marks around Petermen's ability to transition to big boy football as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,488 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    @iDawg and I thought UW was better than UO for about the first half of the duckade

    I get it
    2004 - UO 31 UW 6
    2005 - UO 45 UW 21
    2006 - UO 34 UW 14
    2007 - UO 55 UW 34

    I can see how you thought UW was actually the better team, and only a handful of plays away from proving that.

    See ya in Vegas.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,576 Founders Club
    thechatch said:

    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    @iDawg and I thought UW was better than UO for about the first half of the duckade

    I get it
    2004 - UO 31 UW 6
    2005 - UO 45 UW 21
    2006 - UO 34 UW 14
    2007 - UO 55 UW 34

    I can see how you thought UW was actually the better team, and only a handful of plays away from proving that.

    See ya in Vegas.
    Broken
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,488 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    @iDawg and I thought UW was better than UO for about the first half of the duckade

    I get it
    2004 - UO 31 UW 6
    2005 - UO 45 UW 21
    2006 - UO 34 UW 14
    2007 - UO 55 UW 34

    I can see how you thought UW was actually the better team, and only a handful of plays away from proving that.

    See ya in Vegas.
    Broken
    Nah I’m good👍
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,147 Standard Supporter
    thechatch said:

    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    RaceBannon said:

    thechatch said:

    If Landon goes oh, and three against you – first two years, I will officially be concerned.

    Last year‘s loss was tougher to swallow than this years, and race is going to make fun of me, but I’m convinced that in both games, Oregon was the better team, and at the end of the day that’s on Lanning to make sure that you win when you’re better

    @iDawg and I thought UW was better than UO for about the first half of the duckade

    I get it
    2004 - UO 31 UW 6
    2005 - UO 45 UW 21
    2006 - UO 34 UW 14
    2007 - UO 55 UW 34

    I can see how you thought UW was actually the better team, and only a handful of plays away from proving that.

    See ya in Vegas.
    Broken
    Nah I’m good👍
    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,381
    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    SFGbob said:

    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    Agreed, many quickly realized they'd been sold a pig in a poke but that doesn't negate the fact most were very excited over his hire.


    Didn't the schism that ended up generating this site stem in part from the Sark loyalists and the people who were down on Sark? Or am I not recalling that clearly?
    Nurses?!

    We have runaway poopee in 4a. Cleanup and sedative, stat.
    The harder you try the worse it gets
    Fits right in here on the duck bored.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter