Home› Duck Refuge

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Recent history update

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,288 Founders Club
in Duck Refuge
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,288 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?

    I know we like arbitrary starting points historically speaking around here. I’m just reporting on what I’m seeing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?

    I know we like arbitrary starting points historically speaking around here. I’m just reporting on what I’m seeing.
    10, 15, 20, 25 or since the turn of the century seems more natural to me. 8 years, seems forced and contrived.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,141
    Oregon is 3-2 in its last 5 games against warshington
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,288 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?

    I know we like arbitrary starting points historically speaking around here. I’m just reporting on what I’m seeing.
    10, 15, 20, 25 or since the turn of the century seems more natural to me. 8 years, seems forced and contrived.
    Yeah, 8 seems contrived, except perhaps in that 2015 is the first year post the 2009- 2014 Chip/ GOOD Slingblade run.

    Jury's still out on whether 2023 Oregon can match the achievements of those squads.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    thechatch said:

    Oregon is 3-2 in its last 5 games against warshington

    Sorry, we can only use a prime number in order to measure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?

    I know we like arbitrary starting points historically speaking around here. I’m just reporting on what I’m seeing.
    10, 15, 20, 25 or since the turn of the century seems more natural to me. 8 years, seems forced and contrived.
    Yeah, 8 seems contrived, except perhaps in that 2015 is the first year post the 2009- 2014 Chip/ GOOD Slingblade run.

    Jury's still out on whether 2023 Oregon can match the achievements of those squads.
    You were getting your ass kicked even before Chip came along. Chip just ensured the ass kicking was bigger.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?

    I know we like arbitrary starting points historically speaking around here. I’m just reporting on what I’m seeing.
    10, 15, 20, 25 or since the turn of the century seems more natural to me. 8 years, seems forced and contrived.
    Yeah, 8 seems contrived, except perhaps in that 2015 is the first year post the 2009- 2014 Chip/ GOOD Slingblade run.

    Jury's still out on whether 2023 Oregon can match the achievements of those squads.
    Btw, you guys lost more to Sling blade than you won. He was 3 - 1 against you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,288 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    How about over the last 3 and 3/4s years with games played on Friday's when the QB's mother is in the stands?

    I know we like arbitrary starting points historically speaking around here. I’m just reporting on what I’m seeing.
    10, 15, 20, 25 or since the turn of the century seems more natural to me. 8 years, seems forced and contrived.
    Yeah, 8 seems contrived, except perhaps in that 2015 is the first year post the 2009- 2014 Chip/ GOOD Slingblade run.

    Jury's still out on whether 2023 Oregon can match the achievements of those squads.
    You were getting your ass kicked even before Chip came along. Chip just ensured the ass kicking was bigger.
    You guys are lucky Oregon cared more about football that Washington for most of the past 20 years. Imagine having Slingblade and Willie for 10 of the past 20.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,288 Founders Club
    thechatch said:

    Oregon is 3-2 in its last 5 games against warshington

    But only 1-2 since I became an Oregonian, so I've got that going for me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,288 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,343
    And the Pac 12 hasn't had a playoff win during that time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,343
    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,027
    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    Agreed, many quickly realized they'd been sold a pig in a poke but that doesn't negate the fact most were very excited over his hire.


    Didn't the schism that ended up generating this site stem in part from the Sark loyalists and the people who were down on Sark? Or am I not recalling that clearly?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,728 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    Agreed, many quickly realized they'd been sold a pig in a poke but that doesn't negate the fact most were very excited over his hire.


    Didn't the schism that ended up generating this site stem in part from the Sark loyalists and the people who were down on Sark? Or am I not recalling that clearly?
    Nurses?!

    We have runaway poopee in 4a. Cleanup and sedative, stat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,978
    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Are you kidding me? Nobody was excited about the Sark hire other than the fans who would have been excited and hopeful for any new coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,663
    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    The Sark hire was mostly hated at HHB. There was one notable HHB who celebrated it, his name has been omitted out of respect for the dead. But the majority of us(?) were staunchly against it.

    Lake, yeah most people here celebrated that shitshow.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,141
    haie said:

    SFGbob said:

    greenblood said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    You guys hired Sark. You were trying to be serious about football you just sucked at it

    Jimmy Lake was celebrated and cheered by you guys

    Disagree. Sark wasn't a hire by a school trying to be serious about football.
    You say that now. Sark was a hot commodity when you guys hired him and most of you thought you were lucky to get him. Like I said, you just sucked at it. Hiring Ty was the hire that showed you were more interested in virtue signaling than you were football.
    Most doogs did, but these guys were down on Sark within a couple months of the hire. I've been around a while
    Agreed, many quickly realized they'd been sold a pig in a poke but that doesn't negate the fact most were very excited over his hire.


    Didn't the schism that ended up generating this site stem in part from the Sark loyalists and the people who were down on Sark? Or am I not recalling that clearly?
    Nurses?!

    We have runaway poopee in 4a. Cleanup and sedative, stat.
    The harder you try the worse it gets
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.