Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
Oh, I'm not waving the white flag. Ill continue to post updates on this conflict, which I follow extremely closely.pawz said:
Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.
The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it. -
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.WestlinnDuck said:
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?UW_Doog_Bot said:But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
-
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombreRoadTrip said:
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.WestlinnDuck said:
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?UW_Doog_Bot said:But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff. -
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombreRoadTrip said:
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.WestlinnDuck said:
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?UW_Doog_Bot said:But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff. -
You will follow closely what they want you to follow closely. I have no doubt.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, I'm not waving the white flag. Ill continue to post updates on this conflict, which I follow extremely closely.pawz said:
Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.
The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it.
6 years wasn’t enough.
-
As opposed to you, who follows...what exactly?pawz said:
You will follow closely what they want you to follow closely. I have no doubt.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, I'm not waving the white flag. Ill continue to post updates on this conflict, which I follow extremely closely.pawz said:
Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.
The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it.
6 years wasn’t enough. -
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for startersRoadTrip said:
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombreRoadTrip said:
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.WestlinnDuck said:
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?UW_Doog_Bot said:But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff. -
Well, he’s Jewishpawz said:
Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.PurpleThrobber said:
I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.RoadTrip said:
You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?RaceBannon said:Destroy American energy day 1
Make Europe dependent on Russian gas
Tell Putin he can put the tip in
Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist
Make Russia billions on energy
Make Russia, Iran, and China allies
Kill a bunch of civilians
U
A perfect plan
For a fucking moron like our CIC
@PostGameOrangeSlices
What facts?PostGameOrangeSlices said:You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.
The facts you post?
And you know that how?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for startersRoadTrip said:
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombreRoadTrip said:
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.WestlinnDuck said:
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?UW_Doog_Bot said:But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff. -
It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for startersRoadTrip said:
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombreRoadTrip said:
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.WestlinnDuck said:
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?UW_Doog_Bot said:But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
https://www.nordstrom.com/s/kids-skinny-camo-pants-toddler-little-kid-big-kid/7154919?origin=keywordsearch-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home/All Results&color=211
-
