But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist
Make Russia billions on energy
Make Russia, Iran, and China allies
Kill a bunch of civilians U
A perfect plan
For a fucking moron like our CIC
You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?
I'm on the fence on this one. It's a lot of fucking money, but normally, if the weaponry leads to a complete crumbling of the Russian economy and government, and strikes absolute fear to China, I'm all for it. Fuck those guys.
Unfortunately, the execution afterwards will probably be a shit show, and Russia will be more likely to get Hitler 2.0 to replace Putin than a future leader of democracy. Or worse yet, the country becomes a defacto puppet country of China. So, I'm reserved to the fact that all this money is probably going to leave Europe worse off in 10 years than better.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?
I'm on the fence on this one. It's a lot of fucking money, but normally, if the weaponry leads to a complete crumbling of the Russian economy and government, and strikes absolute fear to China, I'm all for it. Fuck those guys.
Unfortunately, the execution afterwards will probably be a shit show, and Russia will be more likely to get Hitler 2.0 to replace Putin than a future leader of democracy. Or worse yet, the country becomes a defacto puppet country of China. So, I'm reserved to the fact that all this money is probably going to leave Europe worse off in 10 years than better.
You can't say that for certain. It's a LIPO situation.
Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist
Make Russia billions on energy
Make Russia, Iran, and China allies
Kill a bunch of civilians U
A perfect plan
For a fucking moron like our CIC
You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?
Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist
Make Russia billions on energy
Make Russia, Iran, and China allies
Kill a bunch of civilians U
A perfect plan
For a fucking moron like our CIC
You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist
Make Russia billions on energy
Make Russia, Iran, and China allies
Kill a bunch of civilians U
A perfect plan
For a fucking moron like our CIC
You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
Jefferson Davis was a great wartime president until Gettysburg. He only got the South into a Civil War they couldn't win but he was fighting for freedom and democracy when he and his supporters got a 258,000 democrat southerners offed out of a population of 8.7 million and left the south a shattered wreck.
Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist
Make Russia billions on energy
Make Russia, Iran, and China allies
Kill a bunch of civilians U
A perfect plan
For a fucking moron like our CIC
You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.
But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.
The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.
That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.
"Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.
Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.
Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.
Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).
Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).
If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.
Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.
Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.
Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.
Really pathetic stuff.
Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
Comments
Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.
The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it.
6 years wasn’t enough.
The facts you post?
And you know that how?
https://www.nordstrom.com/s/kids-skinny-camo-pants-toddler-little-kid-big-kid/7154919?origin=keywordsearch-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home/All Results&color=211
Unfortunately, the execution afterwards will probably be a shit show, and Russia will be more likely to get Hitler 2.0 to replace Putin than a future leader of democracy. Or worse yet, the country becomes a defacto puppet country of China. So, I'm reserved to the fact that all this money is probably going to leave Europe worse off in 10 years than better.
The hilarious thing is, your friend Putin is the same height:
Zelensky just got back from England and France, and has been all over Ukraine during this conflict - including the front lines:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64038140
A regular General Patton, that one.
Zelensky sucks cock in European capitals while his people get killed thanks to him
Real fucking courageous
You really think mush brain went into some sort of danger zone for his photo op with the dude who has paid his family millions?
Well son of a bitch