Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?

11112141617263

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited February 2023
    pawz said:

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.


    Oh, I'm not waving the white flag. Ill continue to post updates on this conflict, which I follow extremely closely.

    Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.

    The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,727 Founders Club

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam
    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,727 Founders Club

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,780 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.


    Oh, I'm not waving the white flag. Ill continue to post updates on this conflict, which I follow extremely closely.

    Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.

    The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it.
    You will follow closely what they want you to follow closely. I have no doubt.

    6 years wasn’t enough.

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.


    Oh, I'm not waving the white flag. Ill continue to post updates on this conflict, which I follow extremely closely.

    Look forward to watching many more videos of Russians getting annihilated, and many more updates of the situation.

    The fact some conservatives cant even appreciate Rambo wiping out a squad of Russians in 30 seconds is pathetic. This is AMERICA damn it.
    You will follow closely what they want you to follow closely. I have no doubt.

    6 years wasn’t enough.

    As opposed to you, who follows...what exactly?
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam
    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,970 Standard Supporter
    pawz said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Destroy American energy day 1

    Make Europe dependent on Russian gas

    Tell Putin he can put the tip in

    Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist

    Make Russia billions on energy

    Make Russia, Iran, and China allies

    Kill a bunch of civilians
    U

    A perfect plan

    For a fucking moron like our CIC

    You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
    I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
    Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.

    @PostGameOrangeSlices


    Well, he’s Jewish

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.

    What facts?

    The facts you post?

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    And you know that how?
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,727 Founders Club
    edited February 2023

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?

    https://www.nordstrom.com/s/kids-skinny-camo-pants-toddler-little-kid-big-kid/7154919?origin=keywordsearch-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home/All Results&color=211
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,727 Founders Club
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,382
    edited February 2023
    I'm on the fence on this one. It's a lot of fucking money, but normally, if the weaponry leads to a complete crumbling of the Russian economy and government, and strikes absolute fear to China, I'm all for it. Fuck those guys.

    Unfortunately, the execution afterwards will probably be a shit show, and Russia will be more likely to get Hitler 2.0 to replace Putin than a future leader of democracy. Or worse yet, the country becomes a defacto puppet country of China. So, I'm reserved to the fact that all this money is probably going to leave Europe worse off in 10 years than better.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam
    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?

    https://www.nordstrom.com/s/kids-skinny-camo-pants-toddler-little-kid-big-kid/7154919?origin=keywordsearch-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home/All Results&color=211


    The hilarious thing is, your friend Putin is the same height:


  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam

    I'm on the fence on this one. It's a lot of fucking money, but normally, if the weaponry leads to a complete crumbling of the Russian economy and government, and strikes absolute fear to China, I'm all for it. Fuck those guys.

    Unfortunately, the execution afterwards will probably be a shit show, and Russia will be more likely to get Hitler 2.0 to replace Putin than a future leader of democracy. Or worse yet, the country becomes a defacto puppet country of China. So, I'm reserved to the fact that all this money is probably going to leave Europe worse off in 10 years than better.

    You can't say that for certain. It's a LIPO situation.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam

    pawz said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Destroy American energy day 1

    Make Europe dependent on Russian gas

    Tell Putin he can put the tip in

    Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist

    Make Russia billions on energy

    Make Russia, Iran, and China allies

    Kill a bunch of civilians
    U

    A perfect plan

    For a fucking moron like our CIC

    You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
    I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
    Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.

    @PostGameOrangeSlices


    Well, he’s Jewish

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.

    What facts?

    The facts you post?

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    And you know that how?
    @PurpleThrobber

    Zelensky just got back from England and France, and has been all over Ukraine during this conflict - including the front lines:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64038140
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,727 Founders Club

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    It's all good man. You should let him know there’s a sale at Nordstrom's on camouflage. Maybe he could fit into a youth XXL?

    https://www.nordstrom.com/s/kids-skinny-camo-pants-toddler-little-kid-big-kid/7154919?origin=keywordsearch-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home/All Results&color=211


    The hilarious thing is, your friend Putin is the same height:


    Oh got it. So they're big kids now? Not to worry, Nordstrom's has hipper looking camo on sale too:



  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,958 Swaye's Wigwam

    pawz said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Destroy American energy day 1

    Make Europe dependent on Russian gas

    Tell Putin he can put the tip in

    Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist

    Make Russia billions on energy

    Make Russia, Iran, and China allies

    Kill a bunch of civilians
    U

    A perfect plan

    For a fucking moron like our CIC

    You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
    I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
    Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.

    @PostGameOrangeSlices


    Well, he’s Jewish

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.

    What facts?

    The facts you post?

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    And you know that how?
    @PurpleThrobber

    Zelensky just got back from England and France, and has been all over Ukraine during this conflict - including the front lines:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64038140
    I seem to recall him scolding the US Congress in DC too.

    A regular General Patton, that one.

    So, not hiding in a bunker like Russia's fuhrer. Got it.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,207 Standard Supporter

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    Jefferson Davis was a great wartime president until Gettysburg. He only got the South into a Civil War they couldn't win but he was fighting for freedom and democracy when he and his supporters got a 258,000 democrat southerners offed out of a population of 8.7 million and left the south a shattered wreck.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,727 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Destroy American energy day 1

    Make Europe dependent on Russian gas

    Tell Putin he can put the tip in

    Join the EU and WEF nazis in defending a democracy that doesn't exist

    Make Russia billions on energy

    Make Russia, Iran, and China allies

    Kill a bunch of civilians
    U

    A perfect plan

    For a fucking moron like our CIC

    You're pour and can't afford to shop at Nordstroms. Why do you love Putin's cock so much? Stop getting all your news from Feaux and Tucker Carlson. If we don't stop Russia in Ukraine, our? democracy is at stake. Taking Russia out would take no time at all if you would just let us? get our guysms in there. Your IQ is so low you can't understand the yuge ROI in front of us? Zelensky is a badass wardaddy and you're a pussy. What did I miss?
    I read that as if it was written in blue and gold font to be all DEMOCRACY! and shit.
    Nothing says DeMoCrAcY! like a badass wardaddy closing, banning churches and news stations he doesn’t like.

    @PostGameOrangeSlices


    Well, he’s Jewish

    You guys just refuse to acknowledge facts. Talk about an echo chamber.

    What facts?

    The facts you post?

    RoadTrip said:

    RoadTrip said:

    But ma "nuclear threat" is literally a RT talking point aimed at audiences in the West to make housewives nervous about supporting Ukraine with war material. It's unmanly to say the least that so many here are hiding under the rug of appeasement out of political tribalism. Trump was for big swinging dick deterence and so am I.

    The fact is that actual Nato would wipe the fucking floor with Russia in a traditional conflict. That's pretty fucking obvious at this point since Russia can't even take a third world tin pot cleptocracy like Ukraine even before the Western support arrived.

    That means that the nuclear card is literally Russia's last option for deterence and keeping Nato out of actual boots on ground. They won't use it for anything short of existential threat such as ze' Germans rolling on Moscow again.

    "Losing" the war in Ukraine isn't an existential threat for Putin. He has achieved the goal of "de-nazification" and whatever other RT decides to propagandize. If anything, he's used the war to consolidate power, lock Russia down further, rid it of decent, and eliminate rivals. See what he's currently doing to Pregotion and Wagner in Backhmut after he got too upity.

    Come at me bro with trying to tell me I don't know shit or need to do research. I've been following this since the Orange revolution. Go Google it bitch.

    Outside of feeling good about being the world's policeman, once again how is spending hundreds of billions of dollars that we don't have so that it's Ukrainian theftocrats stealing from us and Ukrainians versus having Russian theftocrats stealing from the Ukrainians? Does this make the world safer for American citizens? Does it make the US wealthier? Does it educate our kids?
    Hundreds of billions? Funny math at best. Right up there with calling Bradley's high tech.

    Sending cold War era surplus and slapping a "new cost of replacement" sticker on it isn't going to change how schools are funded(which the federal government shouldn't be doing btw).

    Clearing out our surplus that was built to kill Russians and selling it to Europe to kill Russians with is basically the best possible outcome for the US. Otherwise we'd be paying for decommissioning and disposal(which costs more than sending it to UKR).

    If you want to argue about how the replacement money is spent that's a different discussion about US defense budgets.

    Sorry not sorry, this is such an easy win from the US perspective.

    Is there a bunch of pork rolled into it? Definitely. Again, learn to be able to distinguish the difference.
    Youre fighting the good fight bot, but this thread is filled with the dumbest of the dumb, angry old dipshit conservatives who are incapable of acknowledging reality.

    Everything is now a conspiracy to the low IQ on the right, even selling military equipment to kill a bunch of Russians larping as WW2 Germany.

    Really pathetic stuff.
    Go put your army clothes on little boy; there's a fight to be won.
    You have little boys on the brain. The NAMBLA convention is elsewhere, hombre
    Says the moron who thinks a 5'5" comedian plant is a badass wardaddy. He's your daddy alright.
    He's doing a fine job as a wartime leader. He's not hiding in a bunker, for starters
    And you know that how?
    @PurpleThrobber

    Zelensky just got back from England and France, and has been all over Ukraine during this conflict - including the front lines:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64038140
    I seem to recall him scolding the US Congress in DC too.

    A regular General Patton, that one.

    Hey, Ukrainian pensions are more important than the well-being of Americans! Why can't you see the HUGE ROI? You must have a low IQ.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,459 Founders Club
    George Washington rode his horse in front of the lines

    Zelensky sucks cock in European capitals while his people get killed thanks to him

    Real fucking courageous

    You really think mush brain went into some sort of danger zone for his photo op with the dude who has paid his family millions?

    Well son of a bitch
Sign In or Register to comment.