So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm. How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott...
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm. How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott... Yup. If you guys start throwing out accusations then put your social security number and credit card info by them. Either that or you will be put in timeout. No warning, just gone.
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine. $10.95!
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine. $10.95! *$12.95
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine. TYFYS. Keep it up with the passive aggressiveness and ask when the in-home happened. Based on Scott's comments, it must have happened on Monday or Tuesday night.
So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other. Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine. TYFYS. Keep it up with the passive aggressiveness and ask when the in-home happened. Based on Scott's comments, it must have happened on Monday or Tuesday night. This. But what matters is WHO attended the in-home. Was it the same people who came right before his visit (Ikaika, Bush, Junior) or is Pete going. If Pete isn’t going this is not a good sign because that means he can smell the scent of Johnny Nansens money and doesn’t wanna waste a day in Utah if he knows we don’t have a shot.
What a cocksucker. Maybe if he could be a bit more clear in his fucking ramblings, no one would ask for clarification or take him out of context.
Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"?
All of you criticizing Scott Eklund I would like to see you grab a fucking keyboard and type out of your ass for $10.95 if it is so fucking easy.
I'm so lost, I don't even know what to think anymore. Any other Dawgman subscribers? I need backup. Ecklund is making less than zero sense.
Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"? It's not profitable to say that shit. The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?"
Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"? It's not profitable to say that shit. The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?" This
Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"? It's not profitable to say that shit. The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?" This Are the sheep so dump they can’t see the wolf digging in their wallets?
Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"? It's not profitable to say that shit. The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?" This Are the sheep so dump they can’t see the wolf digging in their wallets? Yes. I'm killing myself for not starting my cult earlier.
