Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Puka Nacua, 2019 4* WR, Orem, UT (Committed)

1…3738404243…162

Comments

  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    CuntWaffle said:

    tvoie said:

    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.
    How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott...
    Yup. If you guys start throwing out accusations then put your social security number and credit card info by them. Either that or you will be put in timeout. No warning, just gone.
    Adult timeout?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    $10.95!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sinceredawg
    sinceredawg Member Posts: 865
    So no birthday parties?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Meek said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    $10.95!
    *$12.95
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    TommySQC said:

    Meek said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    $10.95!
    *$12.95
    Chinflation?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LaMichael_Corleone
    LaMichael_Corleone Member Posts: 1,316
    insinceredawg said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    TYFYS. Keep it up with the passive aggressiveness and ask when the in-home happened. Based on Scott's comments, it must have happened on Monday or Tuesday night.
    This. But what matters is WHO attended the in-home. Was it the same people who came right before his visit (Ikaika, Bush, Junior) or is Pete going. If Pete isn’t going this is not a good sign because that means he can smell the scent of Johnny Nansens money and doesn’t wanna waste a day in Utah if he knows we don’t have a shot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter