Jordan Peterson: Inequality does not always imply discrimination
Comments
-
Moms and dads with basements all over the globe.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
-
True. To see amount of money as having a direct correlation to virtuous living seems erroneous though imo.TurdBuffer said:
Good addiction to have, then. One can do a lot and help a lot of people with lots of money.Gwad said:
The neuroscience model of making money simplifies it to a drug seeking behavior. I guess its a weird thing having addicts drive this thing imo.TurdBuffer said:
As they should.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
If only those Goddamn'd New Energy overlords would stop stealing all the sunlight and wind.Gwad said:
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Greedy fuckers. -
Well its been fun wading in the paradise springs of free thought that is the Tug, but I'm pretty sure some of my comments are being moderated. God speed fellow earthlings.
-
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model. -
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model. -
The fact that you can't answer the question you were asked was entirely predictable.Gwad said:
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people -
You maybe onto something there.PurpleThrobber said:
Moms and dads with basements all over the globe.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people -
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model. -
My working theory is that Social Media has created psychologically dependent creatures out of a generation or two between the ages of 15 and 35, deathly afraid of standing on their own two feet or believing it's not possible because their government-dependent college humanities professors, insanely jealous of the utility & success of Business School professors, have fed them nothing but Howard Zinn, champion socialist of the underdogs, all through HS and college, leading them to believe they are doomed to a life of serfdom unless they join a union and protest the government full time.SFGbob said:
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations. -
I'm glad you finally agreed with me. I especially like the part you ended with, when you said "by design".SFGbob said:Welfare doesn't make poor people poorer, but it does trap a certain percentage of the people on welfare in a life of dependency on the government which is by design.
-
I especially like how you're so fucking stupid and dishonest that you actually believe that statement supports your claim that the "system" makes poor people poorer.
-
You're onto something with that.TurdBuffer said:
My working theory is that Social Media has created psychologically dependent creatures out of a generation or two between the ages of 15 and 35, deathly afraid of standing on their own two feet or believing it's not possible because their government-dependent college humanities professors, insanely jealous of the utility & success of Business School professors, have fed them nothing but Howard Zinn, champion socialist of the underdogs, all through HS and college, leading them to believe they are doomed to a life of serfdom unless they join a union and protest the government full time.SFGbob said:
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations. -
Everything I read past about page 220 is a photocopy of the same ideology applied to analyze different sets of facts, resulting in the same conclusion that a giant, unionized, working-class orgy would fix everything. The longer Zinn drones on, the more delusional he becomes, but I read his bible cover to cover because I got sick of hearing "But have you read Howard Zinn's book(?)" - so I can say, "Yes, I have. Every goddamn'd word of it." And I wish I could have those wasted hours of my life back.SFGbob said:
You're onto something with that.TurdBuffer said:
My working theory is that Social Media has created psychologically dependent creatures out of a generation or two between the ages of 15 and 35, deathly afraid of standing on their own two feet or believing it's not possible because their government-dependent college humanities professors, insanely jealous of the utility & success of Business School professors, have fed them nothing but Howard Zinn, champion socialist of the underdogs, all through HS and college, leading them to believe they are doomed to a life of serfdom unless they join a union and protest the government full time.SFGbob said:
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations. -
1996 called and it wants it’s understanding of basic economics back.Gwad said:
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people -
It’s not a finite system.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
And you don’t get rich taking non existent money. -
You’re reduced to stealing doog bots schtick? Basic economics? Do you have a BS in economics? Didn’t think so. Obviously so.salemcoog said:
1996 called and it wants it’s understanding of basic economics back.Gwad said:
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
So now you’re not too high and mighty to fling feces with fellow trumpanzees GayBob and Lenny? You talked pretty tough the last few weeks. “Thanks Race.” -
Okay, so tell us the limits on human ingenuity.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s not a finite system.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
And you don’t get rich taking non existent money. -
You. Nothing I’ve ever witnessed is more limiting to the human race. Wear it.SFGbob said:
Okay, so tell us the limits on human ingenuity.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s not a finite system.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
And you don’t get rich taking non existent money. -
So you have nothing, got it.
-
If you're going to comment, could you try not to suck so badly at it? Thx.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s not a finite system.TurdBuffer said:
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
And you don’t get rich taking non existent money. -
A lotta words to say that you missed me.CirrhosisDawg said:
You’re reduced to stealing doog bots schtick? Basic economics? Do you have a BS in economics? Didn’t think so. Obviously so.salemcoog said:
1996 called and it wants it’s understanding of basic economics back.Gwad said:
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
So now you’re not too high and mighty to fling feces with fellow trumpanzees GayBob and Lenny? You talked pretty tough the last few weeks. “Thanks Race.”
