Jordan Peterson: Inequality does not always imply discrimination
Comments
-
-
It’s the god damn system!SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
And Bob is on the side of "we need to end food stamps and welfare so people will get back to work". That's the hilarious part.
And what exactly does that have to do with your claim that the "system" makes poor people poorer my stupid little Kunt of a friend? I realize you're in full Hondo Kunt mode now tossing whatever bullshit sounds good to you against the wall hoping something sticks but how exactly does my belief that ending welfare will force more people into the labor market support your claim about the "system" Hondo? -
See?SFGbob said:
And Bob is on the side of "we need to end food stamps and welfare so people will get back to work". That's the hilarious part.
And what exactly does that have to do with your claim that the "system" makes poor people poorer my stupid little Kunt of a friend? I realize you're in full Hondo Kunt mode now tossing whatever bullshit sounds good to you against the wall hoping something sticks but how exactly does my belief that ending welfare will force more people into the labor market support your claim about the "system" Hondo? -
Yes Hondo, I see that you're a lightweight Kunt who can't argue yourself out of wet paper bag who relies on pathetic responses to cover for the fact that you're a dipshit. I see that you'd chew your own pecker off before answering any of the questions you're asked because you know you can't and if you were to try you'd only further confirm to everyone here what a lightweight little bitch you are.
-
Right after he posts his "See" Kunt act response.MikeDamone said:
The old “reading comprehension” retort. Clever. Christ, you’re a stupid mother fucker.2001400ex said:In 1,750 posts. You've yet to demonstrate any ability to read for comprehension.
When will you tell him he’s pressing? -
Say this at your next Socialist party meeting and you'll be thrown out the door for departing from the Marxist Oppression Narrative.2001400ex said:
Ok. I'll respond one time. Everyone else here understands except you.SFGbob said:You're right, the fact that you write like a retard is embarrassing. Shocking you dodged like a Kunt the question that was put to you.
Your response was entirely predictable, no way in hell you'd even defend that dumbfuckery you posted.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
Does that make sense pookie? -
I know your narrative is that I'm a socialist. Cause you can't handle the truth.TurdBuffer said:
Say this at your next Socialist party meeting and you'll be thrown out the door for departing from the Marxist Oppression Narrative.2001400ex said:
Ok. I'll respond one time. Everyone else here understands except you.SFGbob said:You're right, the fact that you write like a retard is embarrassing. Shocking you dodged like a Kunt the question that was put to you.
Your response was entirely predictable, no way in hell you'd even defend that dumbfuckery you posted.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
Does that make sense pookie? -
Is turfbuffer pressing? Is he lacking reading comprehension?2001400ex said:
I know your narrative is that I'm a socialist. Cause you can't handle the truth.TurdBuffer said:
Say this at your next Socialist party meeting and you'll be thrown out the door for departing from the Marxist Oppression Narrative.2001400ex said:
Ok. I'll respond one time. Everyone else here understands except you.SFGbob said:You're right, the fact that you write like a retard is embarrassing. Shocking you dodged like a Kunt the question that was put to you.
Your response was entirely predictable, no way in hell you'd even defend that dumbfuckery you posted.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
Does that make sense pookie? -
No. That's you and Bob.MikeDamone said:
Is turfbuffer pressing? Is he lacking reading comprehension?2001400ex said:
I know your narrative is that I'm a socialist. Cause you can't handle the truth.TurdBuffer said:
Say this at your next Socialist party meeting and you'll be thrown out the door for departing from the Marxist Oppression Narrative.2001400ex said:
Ok. I'll respond one time. Everyone else here understands except you.SFGbob said:You're right, the fact that you write like a retard is embarrassing. Shocking you dodged like a Kunt the question that was put to you.
Your response was entirely predictable, no way in hell you'd even defend that dumbfuckery you posted.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
Does that make sense pookie?
