I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
As they should.
The neuroscience model of making money simplifies it to a drug seeking behavior. I guess its a weird thing having addicts drive this thing imo.
Good addiction to have, then. One can do a lot and help a lot of people with lots of money.
True. To see amount of money as having a direct correlation to virtuous living seems erroneous though imo.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.
If only those Goddamn'd New Energy overlords would stop stealing all the sunlight and wind.
Well its been fun wading in the paradise springs of free thought that is the Tug, but I'm pretty sure some of my comments are being moderated. God speed fellow earthlings.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.
The fact that you can't answer the question you were asked was entirely predictable.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.
My working theory is that Social Media has created psychologically dependent creatures out of a generation or two between the ages of 15 and 35, deathly afraid of standing on their own two feet or believing it's not possible because their government-dependent college humanities professors, insanely jealous of the utility & success of Business School professors, have fed them nothing but Howard Zinn, champion socialist of the underdogs, all through HS and college, leading them to believe they are doomed to a life of serfdom unless they join a union and protest the government full time.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations.
Welfare doesn't make poor people poorer, but it does trap a certain percentage of the people on welfare in a life of dependency on the government which is by design.
I'm glad you finally agreed with me. I especially like the part you ended with, when you said "by design".
I especially like how you're so fucking stupid and dishonest that you actually believe that statement supports your claim that the "system" makes poor people poorer.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.
My working theory is that Social Media has created psychologically dependent creatures out of a generation or two between the ages of 15 and 35, deathly afraid of standing on their own two feet or believing it's not possible because their government-dependent college humanities professors, insanely jealous of the utility & success of Business School professors, have fed them nothing but Howard Zinn, champion socialist of the underdogs, all through HS and college, leading them to believe they are doomed to a life of serfdom unless they join a union and protest the government full time.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.
If someone has more they had to steal it from someone else.
My working theory is that Social Media has created psychologically dependent creatures out of a generation or two between the ages of 15 and 35, deathly afraid of standing on their own two feet or believing it's not possible because their government-dependent college humanities professors, insanely jealous of the utility & success of Business School professors, have fed them nothing but Howard Zinn, champion socialist of the underdogs, all through HS and college, leading them to believe they are doomed to a life of serfdom unless they join a union and protest the government full time.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations.
You're onto something with that.
Everything I read past about page 220 is a photocopy of the same ideology applied to analyze different sets of facts, resulting in the same conclusion that a giant, unionized, working-class orgy would fix everything. The longer Zinn drones on, the more delusional he becomes, but I read his bible cover to cover because I got sick of hearing "But have you read Howard Zinn's book(?)" - so I can say, "Yes, I have. Every goddamn'd word of it." And I wish I could have those wasted hours of my life back.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.
1996 called and it wants it’s understanding of basic economics back.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.
1996 called and it wants it’s understanding of basic economics back.
You’re reduced to stealing doog bots schtick? Basic economics? Do you have a BS in economics? Didn’t think so. Obviously so.
So now you’re not too high and mighty to fling feces with fellow trumpanzees GayBob and Lenny? You talked pretty tough the last few weeks. “Thanks Race.”
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
Its not a finite system
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.
How much land/labor/capital as a percentage of GDP did it take to feed our population 100 years ago? How much does it take today?
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
Socialists don't, and never will, get that point.
It’s not a finite system.
And you don’t get rich taking non existent money.
Okay, so tell us the limits on human ingenuity.
You. Nothing I’ve ever witnessed is more limiting to the human race. Wear it.
Comments
Greedy fuckers.
How many dead whales did it take to light all of England's kerosene lamps at one point? How much electricity does it take today? If we invent cold fusion how much will electricity cost?
There are such things as innovation, efficiency, and added value. Thinking economics is a zero sum game is a 300yr obsolete model.
If you've read all 800+ pages of Zinn's Peoples History of the US without vomiting at how repetitive, ideological and utterly juvenile it is, you'll recognize both the pathology and relationship between Social Media and Zinn's ideology which has poisoned the same two generations.
And you don’t get rich taking non existent money.
So now you’re not too high and mighty to fling feces with fellow trumpanzees GayBob and Lenny? You talked pretty tough the last few weeks. “Thanks Race.”