Jordan Peterson: Inequality does not always imply discrimination
Comments
-
Bob's got a point. Go to a grocery store in any poor neighborhood the day after the shoppers get their welfare checks or EBT cards refilled. Watch all the junkfood they pack into their bags, then watch the roll of cash come out to pay for the alcohol and cigarettes.2001400ex said:
And Bob is on the side of "we need to end food stamps and welfare so people will get back to work". That's the hilarious part.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
I've never been one to rail about the abuse of the welfare system, because I kind of figure those folks are going to cost me one way or another, so simulating a productive life is better, I suppose, than a life of crime or sleeping on the streets. But the entitlement, abuse and waste in the welfare system is as bad today as it's ever been, and it breeds entitlement and dependency.
Obama fucked up by turning it into a moral high ground problem instead of doing what Bill Clinton and Bush 1 did, which was to frame it and treat it as a financial problem.
But Obama and HRC wanted those voted secured, so they tabbed losers as moral winners and fed red meat to the class warriors who now cite the number of people on welfare as "poor people." Obama and the left turned a problem into a catastrophe and it's going to take decades to fix. -
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people -
Welfare doesn't make poor people poorer, but it does trap a certain percentage of the people on welfare in a life of dependency on the government which is by design.
-
It's not a finite system
You don't get rich taking non existent money from people who don't have it -
More Money ≠ More ResourcesSFGbob said:
But it's not a finite system. If it were our GDP would be no greater today than it was in 1908.Gwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
The neuroscience model of making money simplifies it to a drug seeking behavior. I guess its a weird thing having addicts drive this thing imo.TurdBuffer said:
As they should.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people -
Are you deleting my comments? Or is Vanilla erroring out?RaceBannon said:It's not a finite system
You don't get rich taking non existent money from people who don't have it -
Good addiction to have, then. One can do a lot and help a lot of people with lots of money.Gwad said:
The neuroscience model of making money simplifies it to a drug seeking behavior. I guess its a weird thing having addicts drive this thing imo.TurdBuffer said:
As they should.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
The fact that you can't see how the GDP is interdependent on the earth's resources is frightening as fuck.SFGbob said:
What part of the earth's resources are utilized to create video games? That's an entirely new business that was created in the last 35 years that now generates billions of dollars, it's made numerous people fabulously wealthy and created thousands of high paying jobs that have also made people rich. Who did they steal this money from?Gwad said:
Yes the earth has a finite amount of resources. You also don't acquire wealth by dolling out your excess.RaceBannon said:
Its not a finite systemGwad said:
Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.SFGbob said:
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!
And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
