Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jordan Peterson: Inequality does not always imply discrimination

1235789

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Hondo how does my believe that the elimination of Welfare would force many people back into the labor market = the system makes poor people poorer?

    Explain the Kunt logic Hondo.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Hondo how does my believe that the elimination of Welfare would force many people back into the labor market = the system makes poor people poorer?

    Explain the Kunt logic Hondo.

    You just explained it.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    And there's the Kunt act. The two are unrelated. Welfare doesn't make poor people poorer. And there is no "system" that makes poor people poorer.

    You ran your mouth and now you can't back it up therefore we're treated to an endless string of your bullshit.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    And there's the Kunt act. The two are unrelated. Welfare doesn't make poor people poorer. And there is no "system" that makes poor people poorer.

    You ran your mouth and now you can't back it up therefore we're treated to an endless string of your bullshit.

    But how do you add any substantive discussion.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,636 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    You're right, the fact that you write like a retard is embarrassing. Shocking you dodged like a Kunt the question that was put to you.

    Your response was entirely predictable, no way in hell you'd even defend that dumbfuckery you posted.

    Ok. I'll respond one time. Everyone else here understands except you.

    Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.

    Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.

    Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.


    Does that make sense pookie?
    Say this at your next Socialist party meeting and you'll be thrown out the door for departing from the Marxist Oppression Narrative.
    I know your narrative is that I'm a socialist. Cause you can't handle the truth.
    Straight up kill the upper class and educated commie?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    I'm refuting you bullshit claim about the "system" making poor people poorer, while you're running and hiding like a Kunt from defending that bullshit claim Hondo. I've given plenty of substance in response to your bullshit.
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    SFGbob said:

    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.

    Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.

    Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.

    Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.


    You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?

    Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!

    Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
    I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
    While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
    A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
    Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,621 Founders Club
    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.

    Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.

    Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.

    Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.


    You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?

    Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!

    Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
    I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
    While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
    A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
    Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
    Its not a finite system

    And you don't get rich taking non existent money from poor people
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.

    Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.

    Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.

    Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.


    You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?

    Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!

    Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
    I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
    While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
    A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.
    Well in a finite system someones more is someones less.
    But it's not a finite system. If it were our GDP would be no greater today than it was in 1908.

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    Gwad said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.

    Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.

    Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.

    Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.


    You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?

    Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!

    Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?
    I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.
    While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.
    As they should.