Jordan Peterson: Inequality does not always imply discrimination
Comments
-
And Bob is on the side of "we need to end food stamps and welfare so people will get back to work". That's the hilarious part.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
While I understand the desired outcome of his position. I think it is a short sighted perspective that lacks deliberate contemplation and a thoughtful approach to the interconnected nature of things.2001400ex said:
And Bob is on the side of "we need to end food stamps and welfare so people will get back to work". That's the hilarious part.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
That just flew over Bob's head. No more than 5 letters in a word man.Gwad said:
While I understand the desired outcome of his position. I think it is a short sighted perspective that lacks deliberate contemplation and a thoughtful approach to the interconnected nature of things.2001400ex said:
And Bob is on the side of "we need to end food stamps and welfare so people will get back to work". That's the hilarious part.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!! -
The old “reading comprehension” retort. Clever. Christ, you’re a stupid mother fucker.2001400ex said:In 1,750 posts. You've yet to demonstrate any ability to read for comprehension.
When will you tell him he’s pressing? -
Don't you have more ranting to do about the electoral college during the 2018 mid term election?MikeDamone said:
The old “reading comprehension” retort. Clever. Christ, you’re a stupid mother fucker.2001400ex said:In 1,750 posts. You've yet to demonstrate any ability to read for comprehension.
When will you tell him he’s pressing? -
Do you have more profound “gotcha” posts for Race that you think are so clever? Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
Don't you have more ranting to do about the electoral college during the 2018 mid term election?MikeDamone said:
The old “reading comprehension” retort. Clever. Christ, you’re a stupid mother fucker.2001400ex said:In 1,750 posts. You've yet to demonstrate any ability to read for comprehension.
When will you tell him he’s pressing?
-
DaBoner today.MikeDamone said:
Do you have more profound “gotcha” posts for Race that you think are so clever? Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
Don't you have more ranting to do about the electoral college during the 2018 mid term election?MikeDamone said:
The old “reading comprehension” retort. Clever. Christ, you’re a stupid mother fucker.2001400ex said:In 1,750 posts. You've yet to demonstrate any ability to read for comprehension.
When will you tell him he’s pressing?
-
You really showed Race with your vote counts. Tell us more about overwhelming democrat voting states and how it’s relevant. Dumb mother fucker.2001400ex said:
DaBoner today.MikeDamone said:
Do you have more profound “gotcha” posts for Race that you think are so clever? Dumb shit.2001400ex said:
Don't you have more ranting to do about the electoral college during the 2018 mid term election?MikeDamone said:
The old “reading comprehension” retort. Clever. Christ, you’re a stupid mother fucker.2001400ex said:In 1,750 posts. You've yet to demonstrate any ability to read for comprehension.
When will you tell him he’s pressing?
You really proved a lot with that post. So fucking insightful. Idiot -
Hondo. Struggling. Badly.
-
A point not in contention. Does the “system” make poor people poorer, that’s the point in contention.Gwad said:
While I highly doubt for the most part it is intentionally set up this way. The notion does exist that rich people have more influence in the lay of the laws and for the most part desire to make more money.SFGbob said:
I didn't miss anything. You're talking straight out of your ass. There is no "system" that keeps poor people poor or rich people rich.2001400ex said:
Did you miss food stamps and section 8? Or just skip over those?SFGbob said:I quoted you word for fucking word Hondo. Don’t blame me because you can’t express yourself clearly. Hell even with your "clarification" you're still spouting gibberish.
Rich get richer: lobbying system and politicians owned by the wealthy.
Poor get poorer: food stamps, section 8, Obama/Bush phone. Etc. Keep the poor poor.
Poor able to get out: pell grants and other opportunities for the poor to get education and other ways they can move up with hard work.
You claimed the "system" is "setup for the rich to get richer and the poor get poorer." How does an Obama phone keep poor, poor dumbass?
Dance you stupid fucking Kunt, dance!!!



