An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters

Comments

• oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

  January 2018 edited January 2018

  DoubleJDawg said:

  DoubleJDawg said:

  (more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

  An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:
  
  290 poasts
  308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
  3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
  
  557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
  
  I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
  
  
  

  DoubleJDoog Updated Stats:
  
  209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs
  
  557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio
  
  
  

  16 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• DoubleJDawg Member Posts: 636

  January 2018

  oregonblitzkrieg said:

  DoubleJDawg said:

  DoubleJDawg said:

  (more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

  An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:
  
  290 poasts
  308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
  3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
  
  557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
  
  I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
  
  
  

  Updated Stats:
  
  209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs
  
  557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio
  
  
  

  Yeah really a comprehensive ownage by OBK here. Not quite sure how to go over with life on my side here. Sigh.

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,828

  January 2018

  DoubleJDawg said:

  
  

  oregonblitzkrieg said:

  DoubleJDawg said:

  DoubleJDawg said:

  (more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

  An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:
  
  290 poasts
  308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
  3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
  
  557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
  
  I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
  
  
  

  Updated Stats:
  
  209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs
  
  557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio
  
  
  

  Yeah really a comprehensive ownage by OBK here. Not quite sure how to go over with life on my side here. Sigh.

  You should have gone with something like this
  
  
  

  11 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• DoubleJDawg Member Posts: 636

  January 2018

  He WTFed all my historical poasts! So sad about my metrics... (not really sad)
  
  
  
  

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,754

  January 2018 edited January 2018

  
  
  

  22 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738

  January 2018

  Here's what I learned from looking at the data...NOTHING because numbers are scary.
  
  Also, I'd be in first except for @TierbsHsotBoobs who has single handedly fucked up my chin to wtf ratio. Five years of pics or gtfo has ruined me. Thanks Boobs. You dud.

  11 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2018

  DoubleJDawg said:

  DoubleJDawg said:

  (more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

  An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:
  
  290 poasts
  308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
  3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
  
  557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
  
  I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
  
  
  

  Chins are worth double.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2018

  Tequilla said:

  Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
  
  If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance
  
  

  Except that I had a category for this. "Controversial" being highest in combined Rec's and Anti Rec's per poast. Pumpy best at this followed closely by Ballz.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516

  January 2018

  Worthless without pulling Insightfuls and LOLs (RIP)

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,658

  January 2018 edited January 2018

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  uw2010 said:

  Why do you hate @TheChart?

  Alts got cut. Ratios for most were outliers. Maybe i could do an alt bored ranking.
  
  Also, if you didnt make the 100+ list to be ranked then either poast more...or poast less.

  I'm not an alt:
  
  1600 posts.
  2600 upvotes
  1100 Chins
  80 down
  55 wtf
  
  I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,259

  January 2018

  chuck said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  uw2010 said:

  Why do you hate @TheChart?

  Alts got cut. Ratios for most were outliers. Maybe i could do an alt bored ranking.
  
  Also, if you didnt make the 100+ list to be ranked then either poast more...or poast less.

  I'm not an alt:
  
  1600 posts.
  2600 upvotes
  1100 Chins
  80 down
  55 wtf
  
  I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off.

  Worrying about being left off of a list of shit-poasting degenerates... sad...

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255

  January 2018

  Swaye said:

  Here's what I learned from looking at the data...NOTHING because numbers are scary.
  
  Also, I'd be in first except for @TierbsHsotBoobs who has single handedly fucked up my chin to wtf ratio. Five years of pics or gtfo has ruined me. Thanks Boobs. You dud.

  Fuck god, thank boobs
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,658

  January 2018

  PurpleBaze said:

  chuck said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  uw2010 said:

  Why do you hate @TheChart?

  Alts got cut. Ratios for most were outliers. Maybe i could do an alt bored ranking.
  
  Also, if you didnt make the 100+ list to be ranked then either poast more...or poast less.

  I'm not an alt:
  
  1600 posts.
  2600 upvotes
  1100 Chins
  80 down
  55 wtf
  
  I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off.

  Worrying about being left off of a list of shit-poasting degenerates... sad...

  What me worry?
  
  I really don't care. All evidence points to me caring, but it's all false. Fake news. Sad.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2018

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

  I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  YOU ARE ALL
  
  
  
  With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most benign poaster.

  11 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,259

  January 2018

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

  I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  YOU ARE ALL
  
  
  
  With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2018

  PurpleBaze said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

  I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  YOU ARE ALL
  
  
  
  With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster.

  Go figure that of the people I forgot to rank, 5 of them make up the top 6 least controversial poasters.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

  January 2018

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  PurpleBaze said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

  I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  YOU ARE ALL
  
  
  
  With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster.

  Go figure that of the people I forgot to rank, 5 of them make up the top 6 least controversial poasters.

  Forgot or failed?
  
  You fucking failure. DIAFF.

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2018

  BennyBeaver said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  PurpleBaze said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  Actual Data If Anyone Cares To See Where They Rank

  I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  YOU ARE ALL
  
  
  
  With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster.

  Go figure that of the people I forgot to rank, 5 of them make up the top 6 least controversial poasters.

  Forgot or failed?
  
  You fucking failure. DIAFF.

  You sound hurt.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TheHB Member Posts: 6,457

  January 2018

  My RPI is top 50, my SOR is top 40 and my SOS is top 25. And I’m not in the top 109 ... sounds fucking familiar.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989

  January 2018

  Is it better to make 10 posts that get 10 chincredibles each, or 2 posts that get 15 chincredibles each?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter