Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters
Comments
-
-
95th?
Fuck, I'm even more worthless than I thought. I'll let myself out.
-
-
-
An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:DoubleJDawg said:(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)
290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
-
Did you account for alt accounts inflating a particular poster's chins?
-
Which reminds me... @Dennis_DeYoung chins his own poasts. There should be a YUUUUUGE penalty for that.uzi said:Did you account for alt accounts inflating a particular poster's chins?
-
Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance
-
Sure.gifTequilla said:Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance
What's even better than great balance of whatever you are talking about is well-reasoned takes
HTH -
I'd like to really commend @oregonblitzkrieg for the 100+ WTFs on each of my historical poasts in the last couple of hours -- not a dry eye in the DoubleJ household
-
DoubleJDoog Updated Stats:DoubleJDawg said:
An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:DoubleJDawg said:(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)
290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs
557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio
-
Yeah really a comprehensive ownage by OBK here. Not quite sure how to go over with life on my side here. Sigh.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Updated Stats:DoubleJDawg said:
An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:DoubleJDawg said:(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)
290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs
557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio -
You should have gone with something like thisDoubleJDawg said:
Yeah really a comprehensive ownage by OBK here. Not quite sure how to go over with life on my side here. Sigh.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Updated Stats:DoubleJDawg said:
An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:DoubleJDawg said:(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)
290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs
557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio
-
He WTFed all my historical poasts! So sad about my metrics... (not really sad)
-
-
Here's what I learned from looking at the data...NOTHING because numbers are scary.
Also, I'd be in first except for @TierbsHsotBoobs who has single handedly fucked up my chin to wtf ratio. Five years of pics or gtfo has ruined me. Thanks Boobs. You dud. -
Chins are worth double.DoubleJDawg said:
An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:DoubleJDawg said:(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)
290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY -
Except that I had a category for this. "Controversial" being highest in combined Rec's and Anti Rec's per poast. Pumpy best at this followed closely by Ballz.Tequilla said:Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance -
Worthless without pulling Insightfuls and LOLs (RIP)
-
I'm not an alt:UW_Doog_Bot said:
1600 posts.
2600 upvotes
1100 Chins
80 down
55 wtf
I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off. -
Worrying about being left off of a list of shit-poasting degenerates... sad...chuck said:
I'm not an alt:UW_Doog_Bot said:
1600 posts.
2600 upvotes
1100 Chins
80 down
55 wtf
I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off. -
Fuck god, thank boobsSwaye said:Here's what I learned from looking at the data...NOTHING because numbers are scary.
Also, I'd be in first except for @TierbsHsotBoobs who has single handedly fucked up my chin to wtf ratio. Five years of pics or gtfo has ruined me. Thanks Boobs. You dud.
-
What me worry?PurpleBaze said:
Worrying about being left off of a list of shit-poasting degenerates... sad...chuck said:
I'm not an alt:UW_Doog_Bot said:
1600 posts.
2600 upvotes
1100 Chins
80 down
55 wtf
I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off.
I really don't care. All evidence points to me caring, but it's all false. Fake news. Sad. -
I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:
YOU ARE ALL
With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most benign poaster. -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:
YOU ARE ALL
With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster. -
Go figure that of the people I forgot to rank, 5 of them make up the top 6 least controversial poasters.PurpleBaze said:UW_Doog_Bot said:
I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:
YOU ARE ALL
With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster. -
Forgot or failed?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Go figure that of the people I forgot to rank, 5 of them make up the top 6 least controversial poasters.PurpleBaze said:UW_Doog_Bot said:
I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:
YOU ARE ALL
With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster.
You fucking failure. DIAFF. -
You sound hurt.BennyBeaver said:
Forgot or failed?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Go figure that of the people I forgot to rank, 5 of them make up the top 6 least controversial poasters.PurpleBaze said:UW_Doog_Bot said:
I updated the sheet to include @ExtraChrisB @PurpleReign @chuck @uw2010 @DoubleJDawg @BennyBeaver @ThomasFremont and @dflea . Congratulations!!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:
YOU ARE ALL
With the exception of @uw2010 who snuck into the top five but also had the ignominious distinction of also being the most pussy poaster.
You fucking failure. DIAFF. -
My RPI is top 50, my SOR is top 40 and my SOS is top 25. And I’m not in the top 109 ... sounds fucking familiar.
-
Is it better to make 10 posts that get 10 chincredibles each, or 2 posts that get 15 chincredibles each?
