An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters

oregonblitzkrieg

DoubleJDawg said:

DoubleJDawg said:

(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:

290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs

557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.

I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY

DoubleJDoog Updated Stats:

209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs

557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio

DoubleJDawg

oregonblitzkrieg said:

DoubleJDawg said:

DoubleJDawg said:

(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:

290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs

557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.

I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY

Updated Stats:

209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs

557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio

Yeah really a comprehensive ownage by OBK here. Not quite sure how to go over with life on my side here. Sigh.

dnc

DoubleJDawg said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

DoubleJDawg said:

DoubleJDawg said:

(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:

290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs

557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.

I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY

Updated Stats:

209 WTFs + 4 abuse + 2 vote downs = 215 negs

557 recs/215 negs = 2.59 ratio

Yeah really a comprehensive ownage by OBK here. Not quite sure how to go over with life on my side here. Sigh.

You should have gone with something like this

DoubleJDawg

He WTFed all my historical poasts! So sad about my metrics... (not really sad)

NeGgaPlEaSe

Swaye

Here's what I learned from looking at the data...NOTHING because numbers are scary.

Also, I'd be in first except for @TierbsHsotBoobs who has single handedly fucked up my chin to wtf ratio. Five years of pics or gtfo has ruined me. Thanks Boobs. You dud.

UW_Doog_Bot

DoubleJDawg said:

DoubleJDawg said:

(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)

An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:

290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs

557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.

I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY

Chins are worth double.

UW_Doog_Bot

Tequilla said:

Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor

If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance

Except that I had a category for this. "Controversial" being highest in combined Rec's and Anti Rec's per poast. Pumpy best at this followed closely by Ballz.

GrundleStiltzkin

Worthless without pulling Insightfuls and LOLs (RIP)

chuck

UW_Doog_Bot said:

uw2010 said:

Why do you hate @TheChart?

Alts got cut. Ratios for most were outliers. Maybe i could do an alt bored ranking.

Also, if you didnt make the 100+ list to be ranked then either poast more...or poast less.

I'm not an alt:

1600 posts.
2600 upvotes
1100 Chins
80 down
55 wtf

I think that could have gotten me on the list, but fuck off.