Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters
Comments
-
-
95th?
Fuck, I'm even more worthless than I thought. I'll let myself out.
-
-
-
An analytic-based approach requires actual analytics, I think. My stats are:DoubleJDawg said:(more than 100 poasts here, and not an alt, at least as far as you know)
290 poasts
308 vote ups + 249 chins = 557 recs
3 vote downs + 5 WTFs = 8 negs
557/9 = 61.9 ratio which puts me 5th on your leaderboard ahead of actual bored legends such as @GrundleStiltzkin and the great @CokeGreaterThanPepsi.
I take this as a great triumph of targeted shitpoasting (many of my poasts being high-value targets directed at Tequilla's shittastic defense of Peterman's clock management in the Arizona 2015 game #haventforgottenaboutyoumotherfucker) but by all means flag away at my butthurtness of being filtered out as an althandle #GFY
-
Did you account for alt accounts inflating a particular poster's chins?
-
Which reminds me... @Dennis_DeYoung chins his own poasts. There should be a YUUUUUGE penalty for that.uzi said:Did you account for alt accounts inflating a particular poster's chins?
-
Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance
-
Sure.gifTequilla said:Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance
What's even better than great balance of whatever you are talking about is well-reasoned takes
HTH -
I'd like to really commend @oregonblitzkrieg for the 100+ WTFs on each of my historical poasts in the last couple of hours -- not a dry eye in the DoubleJ household
