Oregon in at #17
Comments
-
It took me almost 10 years to reach this level of hate inspired insanityMosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
One measly 70-21 beatdown and mooster is off the rail -
That's not the "O" she's throwing up there.Southerndawg said:Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
-
Mosster47 said:
The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on.
-
This is past Hondo and right into Mosstard stupid. Juts because they were young and shitty last season doesn't mean they are going to transfer to a year older and dominant.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them. -
Mosster47 said:
The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on.
The first two paragraphs were reading like an epic 5 reasons ...
Then you just couldn't help yourself, could you? -
Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.
-
Makes more sense than MossterCatFS' TL:DR 5-quook reasons rant...oregonblitzkrieg said:Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.
-
You hired willingham 2.0oregonblitzkrieg said:Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.
-
You guys want Oregon's narrative to play out like Washington's so badly, it's funny. Yeah I said you guys. Take off that devil mask you doog troll, we know you're in there...Pitchfork51 said:
You hired willingham 2.0oregonblitzkrieg said:Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.
-
Lazy comparison. If you want to compare him to a black coach, at least get it right (Sumlin aka black Sark)Pitchfork51 said:
You hired willingham 2.0oregonblitzkrieg said:Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.
-
Maybe it's time to stop watching footballMosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
Apparently, some sad institution pays this man for his inside football "knowledge."CuntWaffle said:
Maybe it's time to stop watching footballMosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
You spelled Sark wrongPitchfork51 said:
You hired willingham 2.0oregonblitzkrieg said:Ducks will be back. Maybe not this year, but the next or year after that. Spent too much money not to be.
-
There's already a black sark letting it rip
-
Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.
-
Fuck you and fuck Oregon.oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.
-
This is just what they want all the poor people in Oregon to think so they'll buy more faggy shoes and jerseys.Pitchfork51 said:
Fuck you and fuck Oregon.oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.
Was written about by numerous people close to the program in this area. Uncle Phil ain't buying them shit. He wants them to quook so they'll buy more of his company's shit. The results of their coaching search said as much. -
CuntWaffle said:
Maybe it's time to stop breathingMosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
Nobody tries harder in the Natty's than Oregon.oregonblitzkrieg said:Oregon has the best defensive coordinator in the conference. The best o-line coach in the conference. The best that money can buy. We? just won't stop until we buy our way to the championship.
-
Oregon is all about try.
-
Playing for all the marbles is fun. UW should try it sometime.dflea said:Oregon is all about try.
-
Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
-
Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.RaceBannon said:Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
-
Losers lose, loseroregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.RaceBannon said:Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
We won -
Mosster coached running backs at Cholla High for a year guys. You'd better listen.
-
Last time I checked, they canceled your championship game vs the Canes. At least everyone got a non-participation trophy though.RaceBannon said:
Losers lose, loseroregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.RaceBannon said:Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
We won -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Last time I checked, they canceled your championship game vs the Canes. At least everyone got a non-participation trophy though.RaceBannon said:
Losers lose, loseroregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.RaceBannon said:Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
We won
-
RaceBannon said:
Losers lose, loseroregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.RaceBannon said:Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
We won
-
I've been trying to find the stats for that championship game you won but for some reason I just can't. I can't even find the score. What gives?Southerndawg said:RaceBannon said:
Losers lose, loseroregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree. Neither school has won all the marbles yet.RaceBannon said:Winning all the marbles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>playing for marbles
We won
