Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon in at #17
Mad_Son
Member Posts: 10,194
In the deadspin 25
"Can They Make The Playoff?
No, Oregon, can’t make the playoff, win the Pac-12, or even challenge for the Pac-12 North—I don’t see Washington showing up in the playoff either, but the Huskies, let alone Stanford, ain’t losing this thing to the fucking Ducks."
http://deadspin.com/oregon-will-be-as-bad-as-its-defense-allows-1798408431
@oregonblitzkrieg @Mosster47 @AZDuck
"Can They Make The Playoff?
No, Oregon, can’t make the playoff, win the Pac-12, or even challenge for the Pac-12 North—I don’t see Washington showing up in the playoff either, but the Huskies, let alone Stanford, ain’t losing this thing to the fucking Ducks."
http://deadspin.com/oregon-will-be-as-bad-as-its-defense-allows-1798408431
@oregonblitzkrieg @Mosster47 @AZDuck
Comments
-
-
The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with a 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on. -
They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
-
So you're saying the Ducks can win if they score more points than their D allows?Mosster47 said:The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with s 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on. -
Yes, but that's only going to happen against the shit birds like Cal, ASU, and the Beavies.Baseman said:
So you're saying the Ducks can win if they score more points than their D allows?Mosster47 said:The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with s 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on. -
Dick Rods Cats ?Mosster47 said:
Yes, but that's only going to happen against the shit birds like Cal, ASU, and the Beavies.Baseman said:
So you're saying the Ducks can win if they score more points than their D allows?Mosster47 said:The Ducks have the offensive weaponry to score 50+ on everyone. They have the best O-line in the conference and physically the best back. You throw in a kid like Herbert and those little shifty fuckers everywhere at wide out and it's a really good offense. That said our backup QB is a walk-on who is shitty even by walk-on standards. If Herbert goes down TSIO.
The Ducks have the best kicker in the conference also. Being able to rake points every time you clear the 33 yard line is a massive plus.
Here's where things turn to shit; all three zero techniques are true freshman which means Stanford's running backs won't get touched until 3 yards. One of the starting ends are 245lbs. You can't play a 4i at the Pac-12 level with s 245lb guy. The Pagano kid from Clemson will fill that spot the second he is healthy.
One of the middle backers is a walk-on. -
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them. -
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them. -
My God
-
Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
-
Mosster is not a quook. He's a hybrid. A quoot. HTH.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them. -
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves. -
QuookMosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves. -
Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves. -
Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
-
Classy twatBaseman said:Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves. -
Nice use of my protected IPSoutherndawg said:Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves. -
You Gnu hear?Baseman said:
Nice use of my protected IPSoutherndawg said:Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves. -
You can just say Oregon has a pretty good oline and your argument is mostly the same. No reason to lie to yourself into thinking Oregon has 10 guys that would "make every team in America's rotation". That's just ridiculousMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
-
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
-
oh, oh, did the Mountie dismount?
Momma Duck of 2 adorable ducklings!! UO Duck Football fanatic! Proud Oregon Grad '97. -
Crisped.Neighbor2972 said:
You can just say Oregon has a pretty good oline that will never have to suffer a Jesse Sosebee start and your argument is mostly the same.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
You Gnu hear?Baseman said:
Nice use of my protected IPSoutherndawg said:Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
-
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO. -
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
-
Never stop quooking
-
Because I hate the Washington Huskies and you're going to suck again soon and it's literally the funniest thing on the internet when it happens.Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
Huh?
-
I think Upper Campus appreciates Petersen and gaping Oregon's asshole both on the field and in the classroom. Of course, in the classroom will never change, but they probably know better than to hire another drunken idiot when Pete gets tired of collecting rings in a decade.Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
