Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon in at #17
Comments
-
oh, oh, did the Mountie dismount?
Momma Duck of 2 adorable ducklings!! UO Duck Football fanatic! Proud Oregon Grad '97. -
Crisped.Neighbor2972 said:
You can just say Oregon has a pretty good oline that will never have to suffer a Jesse Sosebee start and your argument is mostly the same.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
You Gnu hear?Baseman said:
Nice use of my protected IPSoutherndawg said:Mosster47 said:
It's not a Quook post. I'm saying we are going to get murdered by Stanford, lose by 17ish to UW and be in a barn burner with everyone else as long as Herbert is upright.Sources said:
QPOTDMosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Oregon has the deepest O-line in the conference by quite a stretch which determines good in today's game where each team runs 90 plays, besides Stanford who fucks themselves.
-
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO. -
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
-
Never stop quooking
-
Because I hate the Washington Huskies and you're going to suck again soon and it's literally the funniest thing on the internet when it happens.Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades. -
Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care, they just happened to stumble across a good coach.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
If Bill Gates cared about UW football do you think 21-70 would have happened? Fuck no.
Congrats on potentially having two consecutive seasons worth talking about in decades.
Huh?
-
I think Upper Campus appreciates Petersen and gaping Oregon's asshole both on the field and in the classroom. Of course, in the classroom will never change, but they probably know better than to hire another drunken idiot when Pete gets tired of collecting rings in a decade.Mosster47 said:
Oregon cares about football. UW stopped in 1992. They still don't care.Southerndawg said:
UW's O-line is better than Oregon's. So is Stanford's, USC's, UCLA's, Colorado's, and most likely Utah's and WSU's ..... along with a truck load of other O-lines in the B1G, SEC, ACC and BIG12.Edwin_Bambino said:
UW's oline is 10x better than yours you fucking retard.Mosster47 said:
Infinitely more football knowledge than you. No one plays the same five guys and takes a week off between plays. The Ducks have 10 guys that would make every team in America's rotation. So, by Pac-12 standards that makes them the best line in the conference by default.Edwin_Bambino said:They don't have anywhere close to the best Oline in the PAC what are you smoking?
Are there individual guys that might be better than someone on Oregon's line? Sure, but no one plays "run it behind the one big guy" anymore.
Stanford of course is the exception to all of this, but their style of play also fucks them.
Quookster47 is struggling with the early stages of denial. 4-8 is reality. So is 2 - 7. So is 21 - 70. That said, I do think Oregon's offense can be very good overall. Their real problems are on the other side of the ball. That should improve with the new staff. How much? We'll see. Reality says this is a LIPO situation for the Ducks, but quooks gonna quook and that's a lot more fun than LIPO.
