Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Possible UW Hires if the rumor is true
Comments
-
No one here's defending Romar, and your reading comprehension is failing. Chavy didn't endorse the names in his poast, he simply listed them as likely candidates that Jenn will consider.Gladstone said:
yeadoogville said:
Take this star fucktardedness back to doogman.dnc said:
The Seattle talent is highly overrated. The only 5 star recruit Seattle has put out in years is Porter and he only moved here for his senior year because Romar hired his dad. The Seattle talent base is solid but it got this amazing rep because there were about 5 years where it put out ridiculous talent, which happened to coincide with the years where UW football sucked and hoops was bearable so people gave a shit. But the talent hasn't been "ridiculous" for quite some time.RomarFuckedJenC said:
That's great we are a football school but that doesnt really matter. The talent that comes out of the Seattle area is ridiculous. It would not be that tough to turn this program around and contend for the Pac 12. Especially with how much turnover college basketball has in general.FreeChavez said:
I understand it's difficult to read. especially when i go @Tequilla long, but christ. Dollar would be a TERRIBLE hire based on track record. Bigly terrible! That being said, to deny that tits won't consider him is insane. He's a UW guy who's been in the area and has college experience and will coach for cheap. All of the requirements many people believe will happen. My list is based on possible hires, not what the i dream of Jeanie list looks like.PurpleThrobber said:Jesus Christ - you put Cameron Dollar on that list? Are you fucking kidding?
Just hire Jerome Collins if you want to do stupid shit.
At least you admit it's a lazy hire.
I don't want 90% of the list i wrote, but it's a much more realistic view of who is available and may actually sign up for the job. UW isn't paying almost 2M for romar for 2 more years plus paying 3-4 million a year. It isn't happening. So the 1-2 million range is realistic.
My picks of realistic coaches are rice and musselman. Yes there could be a dark horse but that's why they are a dark horse. Bennett is also a great option and I should have included him in the possible list. I'd still take rice or musselman over him, but still should be there.
As @RoadDawg55 put it, we? are a football school, so yes this job is not going to be an obvious jump to greatness. Romar for all his faults has brought a few top guys in and it's not based on program trajectory(ask markelle).
Win and the place is full lose for 6 seasons and no one cares. Pretty simple.
The only legit 5 star recruit the state has produced since Wroten is Zach Levine, and he was a like a low 20's guy nationally. The last top 10 national recruit the state produced was Abdul Gaddy. The last top 10 national recruit the state produced that was actually worth a damn was Spencer Hawes.
Spencer Hawes is in his 10th season in the NBA.
Seattle area talent is good. But it's not enough of itself to draw a good coach. It's going to take a commitment to hoops and a shit ton of money. Smart money says we'll be hiring someone who sucks.
A Seattle kid literally was a first round draft pick last year. Christ!
bizarro world thread. some of my favorite poasters dnc/chavez/roaddawg talking like they've been manchurian candidated by fetters
that post was an almost literal copy+paste from some dawgman pollyanna attacking someone for questioning sark's coaching ability after getting blown out by every team with a pulse.ThomasFremont said:
Indeed, who would possibly take the UW job?FreeChavez said:
Who's yours? Who's possibly coming to UW? It's obviously a sarcastic bored, but who is running to this program yoda? Love to see itGladstone said:Unfuckingbelievably dumb list. Sorry.
Bark 4 Sark types reveal themselves eventually.
fuck this thread
FWIW, I think we CAN hire a great coach. I don't think we will because I don't think anyone gives a fuck. This is the athletic department that has let Lorenzo Romar keep his job while missing the NCAA's five straight years. We're not breaking the bank to replace him. -
there's a 0% chance jenn will consider cameron dollar lol
i didn't read the other parts of his post
i love to bash the ad as much as anyone
but come on -
Hope you're right. We'll see.Gladstone said:there's a 0% chance jenn will consider cameron dollar lol
i didn't read the other parts of his post
i love to bash the ad as much as anyone
but come on -
@Gladstone, I agree about Dollar. That would be a terrible hire for obvious reasons.
I've seen enough coaching searches to know they don't always end well. More with football, but basketball too. There is a certain amount of luck involved. Most seem to end with the fans a little disappointed that their first options declined before talking themselves into the new hire.
I want Gregg Marshall or another top coach. I really, really fucking doubt it happens. You're a huge doog homer if you think UW is a relevant program nationally. It's not and hardly ever has been save for a year or two.
A 7 seed in 2011 was remembered as a really talented, fun team. We still talk about a Sweet 16 loss with the B Roy team. What about this basketball program is truly worth anything? A rabid arena and the doog pack?
Just fire Romar. I won't watch Husky Basketball until they do. I'll give the new coach a chance as long as it isn't some retread bum.
Up and comer, Archie Miller, former NBA coach, I really don't give a shit. If he sucks in three years, fire him too and start over. -
Just hire some young guy like Nate Robinson etc. who has nothing else going on right now. Give him a $200K/year salary and a huge buyout clause if somebody wants to hire him away. UW basketball can actually make money - by developing coaches. Give him a $500K bonus for each round of the real tourney he progresses to = everybody is happy.
-
Can we put this thread in a delorean and have this conversation exactly one year from now? There is zero fucking chance Romar gets fired. The AD is too worried about losing the stacked recruiting class that will take our team to the CBT.
And in a year, give me Mitch Henderson -
FixedMelloDawg said:I'd be fine with Coach K or Bill Self. Those are my main targets. If not them, I'd fold the program
-
Sam Cunnliffe was a legit national recruit but the space between his ears is vacant.dnc said:
The Seattle talent is highly overrated. The only 5 star recruit Seattle has put out in years is Porter and he only moved here for his senior year because Romar hired his dad. The Seattle talent base is solid but it got this amazing rep because there were about 5 years where it put out ridiculous talent, which happened to coincide with the years where UW football sucked and hoops was bearable so people gave a shit. But the talent hasn't been "ridiculous" for quite some time.RomarFuckedJenC said:
That's great we are a football school but that doesnt really matter. The talent that comes out of the Seattle area is ridiculous. It would not be that tough to turn this program around and contend for the Pac 12. Especially with how much turnover college basketball has in general.FreeChavez said:
I understand it's difficult to read. especially when i go @Tequilla long, but christ. Dollar would be a TERRIBLE hire based on track record. Bigly terrible! That being said, to deny that tits won't consider him is insane. He's a UW guy who's been in the area and has college experience and will coach for cheap. All of the requirements many people believe will happen. My list is based on possible hires, not what the i dream of Jeanie list looks like.PurpleThrobber said:Jesus Christ - you put Cameron Dollar on that list? Are you fucking kidding?
Just hire Jerome Collins if you want to do stupid shit.
At least you admit it's a lazy hire.
I don't want 90% of the list i wrote, but it's a much more realistic view of who is available and may actually sign up for the job. UW isn't paying almost 2M for romar for 2 more years plus paying 3-4 million a year. It isn't happening. So the 1-2 million range is realistic.
My picks of realistic coaches are rice and musselman. Yes there could be a dark horse but that's why they are a dark horse. Bennett is also a great option and I should have included him in the possible list. I'd still take rice or musselman over him, but still should be there.
As @RoadDawg55 put it, we? are a football school, so yes this job is not going to be an obvious jump to greatness. Romar for all his faults has brought a few top guys in and it's not based on program trajectory(ask markelle).
Win and the place is full lose for 6 seasons and no one cares. Pretty simple.
The only legit 5 star recruit the state has produced since Wroten is Zach Levine, and he was a like a low 20's guy nationally. The last top 10 national recruit the state produced was Abdul Gaddy. The last top 10 national recruit the state produced that was actually worth a damn was Spencer Hawes.
Spencer Hawes is in his 10th season in the NBA.
Seattle area talent is good. But it's not enough of itself to draw a good coach. It's going to take a commitment to hoops and a shit ton of money. Smart money says we'll be hiring someone who sucks.
Joe Harris - would have been a national recruit if Tony Bennett hadn't latched onto his dick early.
-
The only game I've watched this year was about 5 minutes of the UW-UCLA game at a casino and they eventually switched it off and put a women's UFC fight on.
Haven't really even seen Fultz play and couldn't name half the team -
skinned said:
Can we put this thread in a delorean and have this conversation exactly one year from now? There is zero fucking chance Romar gets fired. The AD is too worried about losing the stacked recruiting class that will take our team to the CBT.
And in a year, after missing the tourney again and the departure of Michael Porter and other one-and-dones give me Mitch Henderson -
Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference. -
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
-
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche -
PurpleThrobber said:
Sam Cuntlips was a legit national recruit but the space between his ears is vacant.dnc said:
The Seattle talent is highly overrated. The only 5 star recruit Seattle has put out in years is Porter and he only moved here for his senior year because Romar hired his dad. The Seattle talent base is solid but it got this amazing rep because there were about 5 years where it put out ridiculous talent, which happened to coincide with the years where UW football sucked and hoops was bearable so people gave a shit. But the talent hasn't been "ridiculous" for quite some time.RomarFuckedJenC said:
That's great we are a football school but that doesnt really matter. The talent that comes out of the Seattle area is ridiculous. It would not be that tough to turn this program around and contend for the Pac 12. Especially with how much turnover college basketball has in general.FreeChavez said:
I understand it's difficult to read. especially when i go @Tequilla long, but christ. Dollar would be a TERRIBLE hire based on track record. Bigly terrible! That being said, to deny that tits won't consider him is insane. He's a UW guy who's been in the area and has college experience and will coach for cheap. All of the requirements many people believe will happen. My list is based on possible hires, not what the i dream of Jeanie list looks like.PurpleThrobber said:Jesus Christ - you put Cameron Dollar on that list? Are you fucking kidding?
Just hire Jerome Collins if you want to do stupid shit.
At least you admit it's a lazy hire.
I don't want 90% of the list i wrote, but it's a much more realistic view of who is available and may actually sign up for the job. UW isn't paying almost 2M for romar for 2 more years plus paying 3-4 million a year. It isn't happening. So the 1-2 million range is realistic.
My picks of realistic coaches are rice and musselman. Yes there could be a dark horse but that's why they are a dark horse. Bennett is also a great option and I should have included him in the possible list. I'd still take rice or musselman over him, but still should be there.
As @RoadDawg55 put it, we? are a football school, so yes this job is not going to be an obvious jump to greatness. Romar for all his faults has brought a few top guys in and it's not based on program trajectory(ask markelle).
Win and the place is full lose for 6 seasons and no one cares. Pretty simple.
The only legit 5 star recruit the state has produced since Wroten is Zach Levine, and he was a like a low 20's guy nationally. The last top 10 national recruit the state produced was Abdul Gaddy. The last top 10 national recruit the state produced that was actually worth a damn was Spencer Hawes.
Spencer Hawes is in his 10th season in the NBA.
Seattle area talent is good. But it's not enough of itself to draw a good coach. It's going to take a commitment to hoops and a shit ton of money. Smart money says we'll be hiring someone who sucks.
Joe Harris - would have been a national recruit if Tony Bennett hadn't latched onto his dick early. -
Sorry, what could ridiculous possibly mean if not elite? If anything ridiculous is a stronger term than elite.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche
And I apologize for calling you a fucking moron. Channeled my inner DDY there for a second. That's not my typical style. My bad. -
Why are you still preemptively excusing a shit hire? Seattle is a great basketball city. Basketball starved. The recruiting base is very solid. When winning we've shown time and time again our student section is fantastic, certainly the best in the conference. Lute himself said ten years ago that UW is a sleeping powerhouse and scared the piss out of him.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Please have standards. It's ok. I'm not saying we're going to back the truck up for Archie (who would certainly come for the right price), but there are enough built in factors that exist right now for this to be a quick turnaround.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBwMBm9n_A
Watch that before you respond. It won't take much to be at least respectable. Fuck. -
You got suckered back into an AIDS thread.Gladstone said:
Why are you still preemptively excusing a shit hire? Seattle is a great basketball city. Basketball starved. The recruiting base is very solid. When winning we've shown time and time again our student section is fantastic, certainly the best in the conference. Lute himself said ten years ago that UW is a sleeping powerhouse and scared the piss out of him.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Please have standards. It's ok. I'm not saying we're going to back the truck up for Archie (who would certainly come for the right price), but there are enough built in factors that exist right now for this to be a quick turnaround.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBwMBm9n_A
Watch that before you respond. It won't take much to be at least respectable. Fuck.
You should have taken the tri-cocktail -
yeah i'm out
-
Excusing a shit hire and expecting a shit hire are not the same thing.Gladstone said:
Why are you still preemptively excusing a shit hire? Seattle is a great basketball city. Basketball starved. The recruiting base is very solid. When winning we've shown time and time again our student section is fantastic, certainly the best in the conference. Lute himself said ten years ago that UW is a sleeping powerhouse and scared the piss out of him.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Please have standards. It's ok. I'm not saying we're going to back the truck up for Archie (who would certainly come for the right price), but there are enough built in factors that exist right now for this to be a quick turnaround.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBwMBm9n_A
Watch that before you respond. It won't take much to be at least respectable. Fuck.
I will be fucking pissed when we make a shit hire.
I won't be surprised though.
Again, what part of Romar's six straight seasons with no NCAA's tells you anyone in the AD GAF about hoops? Honestly, I'll be surprised if he's not the coach next season. But even if he's not, it's not going to be Archie or anyone close to that tier. -
Archie is going to get a Shaka smart contact whenever he wants to leave. UW will not pay that type of money(3M +) for a basketball coach. Period.dnc said:
Excusing a shit hire and expecting a shit hire are not the same thing.Gladstone said:
Why are you still preemptively excusing a shit hire? Seattle is a great basketball city. Basketball starved. The recruiting base is very solid. When winning we've shown time and time again our student section is fantastic, certainly the best in the conference. Lute himself said ten years ago that UW is a sleeping powerhouse and scared the piss out of him.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Please have standards. It's ok. I'm not saying we're going to back the truck up for Archie (who would certainly come for the right price), but there are enough built in factors that exist right now for this to be a quick turnaround.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBwMBm9n_A
Watch that before you respond. It won't take much to be at least respectable. Fuck.
I will be fucking pissed when we make a shit hire.
I won't be surprised though.
Again, what part of Romar's six straight seasons with no NCAA's tells you anyone in the AD GAF about hoops? Honestly, I'll be surprised if he's not the coach next season. But even if he's not, it's not going to be Archie or anyone close to that tier. -
Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
-
Doogliest, doog of doogism comment in this doog awful thread.dhdawg said:Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
-
It was SarkasmFreeChavez said:
Doogliest, doog of doogism comment in this doog awful thread.dhdawg said:Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
-
WhooshedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
It was SarkasmFreeChavez said:
Doogliest, doog of doogism comment in this doog awful thread.dhdawg said:Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
#isupportcoachromar -
#isupportromarsretirement
Fuck...haven't followed CBB in a while but my non-TCU MBA says it's a no-brainer. Tell him it can be a messy, or tell him you'll pay him what he is owed and invent a part-time position for him in the AD office...alumni outreach bullshit or something. Anything he raises (guessing it won't be much) can offset his buyout. Shit basketball for another year will make the hole the next guy has to dig out of much worse (and more costly longer term to the AD with a lot more shit basketball going forward with recruiting falling off the deep end after next year class).
And somebody like Musselman seems like a no-brainer. He's paid $400k currently...you should be able to get him for under $2MM/yr. He's got an NBA pedigree which can't hurt recruiting...if he wants to go back to the NBA who cares...that means we got good enough somebody wants him. And whoever comes in is going to offer Porter Sr a job...they aren't going to be morons. Even if they have to teach him how to coach they will, and Porter Sr will stick around if there is something in it for him (I'm sure Bill Self will offer him a job but not sure who else). And if it's someone with a longer coaching background esp in the NBA like Musselman rather than a young coach he's more likely to stay.
And the UW job should look pretty sweet to coaches...low expectations (last guy went 6+years without the NCAAs) with a lot of upside/potential to do well, good pay in a good location.
Sloppy wont screw this up (I hope). -
UW can be good, Seattle is a good basketball city. A good AD would make a solid hire.Gladstone said:
Why are you still preemptively excusing a shit hire? Seattle is a great basketball city. Basketball starved. The recruiting base is very solid. When winning we've shown time and time again our student section is fantastic, certainly the best in the conference. Lute himself said ten years ago that UW is a sleeping powerhouse and scared the piss out of him.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Please have standards. It's ok. I'm not saying we're going to back the truck up for Archie (who would certainly come for the right price), but there are enough built in factors that exist right now for this to be a quick turnaround.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBwMBm9n_A
Watch that before you respond. It won't take much to be at least respectable. Fuck.
You are making my point about UW being irrelevant though. That video is from the 2011 Pac 12 championship. We went to the tournament as a 7 seed and got bounced in the 2nd round. Real programs aren't pining over seasons like that, remembering those times as the good ol days. -
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, and napalm you.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche -
BHAM!!!!Swaye said:
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, and napalm you.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche -
Why don't you two just cyber and get it over withSwaye said:
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, and napalm you.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche
-
Keeping it accurate.Swaye said:
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, andRomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douchenapalmscalp you.
