Possible UW Hires if the rumor is true
Comments
-
Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
-
Doogliest, doog of doogism comment in this doog awful thread.dhdawg said:Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
-
It was SarkasmFreeChavez said:
Doogliest, doog of doogism comment in this doog awful thread.dhdawg said:Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
-
WhooshedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
It was SarkasmFreeChavez said:
Doogliest, doog of doogism comment in this doog awful thread.dhdawg said:Ken bone is tanned rested and ready
#isupportcoachromar -
#isupportromarsretirement
Fuck...haven't followed CBB in a while but my non-TCU MBA says it's a no-brainer. Tell him it can be a messy, or tell him you'll pay him what he is owed and invent a part-time position for him in the AD office...alumni outreach bullshit or something. Anything he raises (guessing it won't be much) can offset his buyout. Shit basketball for another year will make the hole the next guy has to dig out of much worse (and more costly longer term to the AD with a lot more shit basketball going forward with recruiting falling off the deep end after next year class).
And somebody like Musselman seems like a no-brainer. He's paid $400k currently...you should be able to get him for under $2MM/yr. He's got an NBA pedigree which can't hurt recruiting...if he wants to go back to the NBA who cares...that means we got good enough somebody wants him. And whoever comes in is going to offer Porter Sr a job...they aren't going to be morons. Even if they have to teach him how to coach they will, and Porter Sr will stick around if there is something in it for him (I'm sure Bill Self will offer him a job but not sure who else). And if it's someone with a longer coaching background esp in the NBA like Musselman rather than a young coach he's more likely to stay.
And the UW job should look pretty sweet to coaches...low expectations (last guy went 6+years without the NCAAs) with a lot of upside/potential to do well, good pay in a good location.
Sloppy wont screw this up (I hope). -
UW can be good, Seattle is a good basketball city. A good AD would make a solid hire.Gladstone said:
Why are you still preemptively excusing a shit hire? Seattle is a great basketball city. Basketball starved. The recruiting base is very solid. When winning we've shown time and time again our student section is fantastic, certainly the best in the conference. Lute himself said ten years ago that UW is a sleeping powerhouse and scared the piss out of him.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Please have standards. It's ok. I'm not saying we're going to back the truck up for Archie (who would certainly come for the right price), but there are enough built in factors that exist right now for this to be a quick turnaround.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EBwMBm9n_A
Watch that before you respond. It won't take much to be at least respectable. Fuck.
You are making my point about UW being irrelevant though. That video is from the 2011 Pac 12 championship. We went to the tournament as a 7 seed and got bounced in the 2nd round. Real programs aren't pining over seasons like that, remembering those times as the good ol days. -
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, and napalm you.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche -
BHAM!!!!Swaye said:
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, and napalm you.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche -
Why don't you two just cyber and get it over withSwaye said:
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, and napalm you.RomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douche
-
Keeping it accurate.Swaye said:
If you talk to @dnc like this again I will track you, locate you, andRomarFuckedJenC said:
Dude you were talking about all the 5 stars like the last 10 years. No one said the talent alone would draw a coach. There is a ridiculous talent base but that differs from year to year obviously. I think your mistaking the term ridiculous for elite you fucking idiot.dnc said:
You're a fucking moron. I said multiple times it's a good recruiting base. I never once suggested there's not talent in Seattle. My poont which I've repeatedly made and you've repeatedly failed to get, is that it's not a special recruiting area (or "ridiculous" as you put it). That was a very brief moment in history that has long passed. So the recruiting base is not going to draw a coach in and of itself. It's the commitment to hoops and the paycheck that will draw a coach. Which is why we will not draw a coach who is in demand.RomarFuckedJenC said:Why the fuck does Seattle need to have a top 10 recruit to be a good basketball area. There are plenty of good 4 star players plus what you get out of Portland and Cali.
Don't give me this doog shit about star rankings and there not being good talent in Seattle. Its called coaching up players. Why even take a top 10 Guy who is only here for a year and won't learn how to play defense or be around long enough to make a difference.
hth.
Hth douchenapalmscalp you.
