Kim "O-line recruiting has been fine"
Jesus christ u can't make this stuff up
Comments
-
If you take away the injuries and wash outs that's an All PAC 12 caliber line.
-
Sark's best line was with Ty's recruits lol. Ever since Sark's guys started to replace them the line became noticably shittier.
-
Kim said before the year that the people who thought the OL was average or worse were "haters." This faggot does not just stalk 16 year olds, he talks like one too.
After the year I already know Fetters will argue with someone that the OL was very good and point to Sankey's stats. These guys are too easy. -
Quote of the night from Eklund
"I haven't quite been able to reach him"
Kim: "can't u just call him again?"
Eklund: "oh yeah, yeah, I can call him like all those other people who call him and call him and call him and text him and facebook him and all that but that's not me."
LOL, fucking liar -
This screenshot needs to be posted again.
Also Kohler would be all Pac-12 before injuries??? Ummm his ass was benched during the Utah game for Hatchie. He was fucking terrible as a tackle that they moved him to guard.
What evidence does Fat Fuck Fatters have to suggest he would be all Pac-12?? Jesus christ they are now just making up pure lies. -
I heard him and Eklund the day after the 4th of July I believe and were touting the o-line. They used the word haters probably 15 times in 10 minutes. I honestly couldn't believe it was KJR, goes to show what KJR has become.
-
That's where you're wrongdhdawg said:u can't make this stuff up
-
Wow, just wow. I had never seen that screenshot before.He_Needs_More_Time said:This screenshot needs to be posted again.
Also Kohler would be all Pac-12 before injuries??? Ummm his ass was benched during the Utah game for Hatchie. He was fucking terrible as a tackle that they moved him to guard.
What evidence does Fat Fuck Fatters have to suggest he would be all Pac-12?? Jesus christ they are now just making up pure lies.
-
It's another screenshot that is supposedly been "fucked with" by us HHB's who obviously have an agenda.RoadDawg55 said:
Wow, just wow. I had never seen that screenshot before.He_Needs_More_Time said:This screenshot needs to be posted again.
Also Kohler would be all Pac-12 before injuries??? Ummm his ass was benched during the Utah game for Hatchie. He was fucking terrible as a tackle that they moved him to guard.
What evidence does Fat Fuck Fatters have to suggest he would be all Pac-12?? Jesus christ they are now just making up pure lies.
It's fucking hilarious though that Kim never holds Sark to his 10 OL every two years. -
2013: our QB gets sacked 8.24% per attempt. This ranks UW 104th in D-1 FBS
2012 = 8.22% rank: 110th
The facts prove our offensive line has improved. Kim was right after all -
I remember after the first game being told this new offense will prevent sacks and it doesn't matter if you have bad OL.sarktastic said:2013: our QB gets sacked 8.24% per attempt. This ranks UW 104th in D-1 FBS
2012 = 8.22% rank: 110th
The facts prove our offensive line has improved. Kim was right after all -
Nathan Rhodes was on his way to being a first round draft pick.
-
Nice blast from the past.TheKobeStopper said:Nathan Rhodes was on his way to being a first round draft pick.
-
the facts prove what you heard was true. we have improved.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I remember after the first game being told this new offense will prevent sacks and it doesn't matter if you have bad OL.sarktastic said:2013: our QB gets sacked 8.24% per attempt. This ranks UW 104th in D-1 FBS
2012 = 8.22% rank: 110th
The facts prove our offensive line has improved. Kim was right after all -
The definition of a "Hater" is anyone with anything critical to say. Except Haters are open season for anybody crapping all over them.jecornel said:I heard him and Eklund the day after the 4th of July I believe and were touting the o-line. They used the word haters probably 15 times in 10 minutes. I honestly couldn't believe it was KJR, goes to show what KJR has become.
-
sarktastic said:
2013: our QB gets sacked 8.24% per attempt. This ranks UW 104th in D-1 FBS
2012 = 8.22% rank: 110th
The facts prove our offensive line has improved. Kim was right after all
It really is amazing how the offensive stats remain the same year to year. This is not a new offense; it's the same offense just faster. It's the same offensive coaches. It's the same Shitty Cozzetto (or is it Costello). Who's on first? Sark has no fucking clue. -
How is it that Kohler has all those starts, and all the time in the system, and he still plays like he's never been on the field before? Coztello sucks. He's the last of the Idaho Mafia that's left. SHIT CAN HIS ASS.
-
Obvious fix.death2ducks said:How is it that Kohler has all those starts, and all the time in the system, and he still plays like he's never been on the field before?
CoztelloSark sucks. SHIT CAN HIS ASS. -
Eklund also said later in the podcast that Cozetto is a good coach or else he wouldn't be around this long.
-
I remember Sark and other Doogs saying that about Holt two years ago.dhdawg said:Eklund also said later in the podcast that Cozetto is a good coach or else he wouldn't be around this long.
-
I think Keith Price has been the most pressured QB in FBS the last two seasons. Shows how much our OL sucks.
-
A former player of Sark's told me going into 2012 that our OL was a fucking joke. He was like don't read the hype, trust me they all suck ass. Told me they don't work hard in the weight room and called Hatchie "bitch tits". Said Kohler was the biggest pussy he's ever met in his entire life.
These are your Sarkisian Washington Huskies folks. -
The best part of the O-line, according to Sark on Monday, is that all 5 starters return. and he's excited about that. and this is the reason why oline is not a focus in recruiting this year. and next year's o-line recruiting is going to be amazing. and he's already in on a bunch of great recruits. but, sorry, NCAA rules prohibit him from talking about them but, he's excited about them and you should be too.
-
As depressing as it is thinking about all these unathletic fucks coming back next year, it's really gonna bite ass in 2015 when we have guys like Coleman (will be 18 years old by then) Shelton and Andrew (Oregon wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole) Kirkland in there
-
do you even need linemen if 90% of your offensive plays are slow motion bubble screens... to your smallest and youngest receivers?
-
Hatters gonna hat.jecornel said:I heard him and Eklund the day after the 4th of July I believe and were touting the o-line. They used the word haters probably 15 times in 10 minutes. I honestly couldn't believe it was KJR, goes to show what KJR has become.
-
Like softy says, it just five guys out there. No one stands out. I wish he would take it a step further and pin it on sark.
-
I just cannot understand how any doog in her heart of hearts could reconcile Sarkisian with (1) his OL recruiting and performance in a five year span of failure and (2) his own statements about competing for Rose Bowls in short order.
It's a goddamned cult of personality. A cult of personality for a man who has nothing remarkable whatsoever about him. What does Sark do that's above average?
Recruit? No, see: OL and instate.
Toughness? LOL no.
Penalties and discipline? No.
Fundamentals? No.
Beat rivals? No.
Offensive identity? No.
Special teams? No.
Clock management? No.
Tangible yearly improvement? No.
Play on road? No.
Playcalling? No.
Week to week gameplanning? No.
Hire solid assistants? No.*
Kids sent to the NFL? No.
Eloquence? No.
Integrity? No.
* The unequivocal failure of Holt/Nansen/Cozetto negates Wilcox/Sirmon, and when we take into account that Woodward forced Sark's hand in firing Holt, giving this an 'average' rating may actually be a bit generous.
Couple all of that with the fact that this was a once-proud elite tier 1 football school and it's maddening (and hilarious is a cynical sort of way).
I seriously want to ask these Sarkisian fans what it is exactly he does above average...graduate his players? Uh, ok. I expect any coach at UW to graduate his or her players. That is to be assumed, not praised. -
Some of you sure love to be negative
-
Understands his fan base? Yes.Gladstone said:I just cannot understand how any doog in her heart of hearts could reconcile Sarkisian with (1) his OL recruiting and performance in a five year span of failure and (2) his own statements about competing for Rose Bowls in short order.
It's a goddamned cult of personality. A cult of personality for a man who has nothing remarkable whatsoever about him. What does Sark do that's above average?
Recruit? No, see: OL and instate.
Toughness? LOL no.
Penalties and discipline? No.
Fundamentals? No.
Beat rivals? No.
Offensive identity? No.
Special teams? No.
Clock management? No.
Tangible yearly improvement? No.
Play on road? No.
Playcalling? No.
Week to week gameplanning? No.
Hire solid assistants? No.*
Kids sent to the NFL? No.
Eloquence? No.
Integrity? No.
* The unequivocal failure of Holt/Nansen/Cozetto negates Wilcox/Sirmon, and when we take into account that Woodward forced Sark's hand in firing Holt, giving this an 'average' rating may actually be a bit generous.
Couple all of that with the fact that this was a once-proud elite tier 1 football school and it's maddening (and hilarious is a cynical sort of way).
I seriously want to ask these Sarkisian fans what it is exactly he does above average...graduate his players? Uh, ok. I expect any coach at UW to graduate his or her players. That is to be assumed, not praised.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
