Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We're gonna get fucked over by the committee
Comments
-
if you are confident we beat USC, root like hard for Utah. a win over colorado puts Utah back in the top 15ExtraChrisB said:Utah punt return touchdown. Fuck. Everything has gone the wrong way for us today.
-
I'm not confident in beating USC.dhdawg said:
if you are confident we beat USC, root like hard for Utah. a win over colorado puts Utah back in the top 15ExtraChrisB said:Utah punt return touchdown. Fuck. Everything has gone the wrong way for us today.
-
If Peterman is the coach we think he is, UW should win rather easily, say 34-17.ExtraChrisB said:
I'm not confident in beating USC.dhdawg said:
if you are confident we beat USC, root like hard for Utah. a win over colorado puts Utah back in the top 15ExtraChrisB said:Utah punt return touchdown. Fuck. Everything has gone the wrong way for us today.
-
Alabama is just as balanced and better.RoadDawg55 said:
It would be pretty devastating.dhdawg said:worst case, if UW wins next week of course, is a rose bowl berth against Michigan. which isn't bad either
It should be obvious to anyone that UW is a top 4 team. No team in the country has as balanced of a team as UW.
We can run, we can throw, we have playmakers, we stop the run, we have a great secondary, and we are well coached. No other team has an offense and defense on UW's level. Both are very good to elite.
Other than Arizona, we have destroyed every team we should have. We score 40+ and we hold them under 21.
Hope this helps. -
Bama is still the #1 seed.priapism said:Florida wins against Bama. Discuss.
You can't drop then out after losing 40 members of their team in a bus crash on the way to Atlanta. -
The committee likes Colorado more than USC.GrundleStiltzkin said:
A win against SC is enough. A win over Colorado probably requires some style points to be sure.halfbrainmanmolder said:If we play SC next week and win, there is no fucking way we(?) get left out. It is the next best thing to being undefeated when you avenge your only loss. Last I checked, we have only one team left that is still undefeated. We could be even ranked 2nd if we destroy SC next week.
If we play the Buffs, there is a small chance we get left out. But it would make the committee look like idiots (but we all know there are lots of idiots on that committee to start with) especially if we go on to win the Rose Bowl.
But first thing first, win next week's game! -
I'm with boobs. I don't know why anyone would want USC. The committee has Colorado ranked higher therefore it helps us more to beat them. Simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The committee likes Colorado more than USC.GrundleStiltzkin said:
A win against SC is enough. A win over Colorado probably requires some style points to be sure.halfbrainmanmolder said:If we play SC next week and win, there is no fucking way we(?) get left out. It is the next best thing to being undefeated when you avenge your only loss. Last I checked, we have only one team left that is still undefeated. We could be even ranked 2nd if we destroy SC next week.
If we play the Buffs, there is a small chance we get left out. But it would make the committee look like idiots (but we all know there are lots of idiots on that committee to start with) especially if we go on to win the Rose Bowl.
But first thing first, win next week's game! -
Alabamas offense is horribly unbalanced in a doogtastic run every down kinda way. IFFFFF you could ever clog up their run game and keep that dude in the pocket the ints will rain down.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Alabama is just as balanced and better.RoadDawg55 said:
It would be pretty devastating.dhdawg said:worst case, if UW wins next week of course, is a rose bowl berth against Michigan. which isn't bad either
It should be obvious to anyone that UW is a top 4 team. No team in the country has as balanced of a team as UW.
We can run, we can throw, we have playmakers, we stop the run, we have a great secondary, and we are well coached. No other team has an offense and defense on UW's level. Both are very good to elite.
Other than Arizona, we have destroyed every team we should have. We score 40+ and we hold them under 21.
Hope this helps. -
Their defense is better and they are deeper. If you think their offense is better, I have some oceanside property in South Dakota to sell you.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Alabama is just as balanced and better.RoadDawg55 said:
It would be pretty devastating.dhdawg said:worst case, if UW wins next week of course, is a rose bowl berth against Michigan. which isn't bad either
It should be obvious to anyone that UW is a top 4 team. No team in the country has as balanced of a team as UW.
We can run, we can throw, we have playmakers, we stop the run, we have a great secondary, and we are well coached. No other team has an offense and defense on UW's level. Both are very good to elite.
Other than Arizona, we have destroyed every team we should have. We score 40+ and we hold them under 21.
Hope this helps. -
Penn state has an absolutely horseshit OOC, Kent state, Pitt (L), and Temple. How that is not discussed is baffling.
-
The one valid argument for a Colorado loss is that it boosts Utah a bit.Swaye said:
I'm with boobs. I don't know why anyone would want USC. The committee has Colorado ranked higher therefore it helps us more to beat them. Simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The committee likes Colorado more than USC.GrundleStiltzkin said:
A win against SC is enough. A win over Colorado probably requires some style points to be sure.halfbrainmanmolder said:If we play SC next week and win, there is no fucking way we(?) get left out. It is the next best thing to being undefeated when you avenge your only loss. Last I checked, we have only one team left that is still undefeated. We could be even ranked 2nd if we destroy SC next week.
If we play the Buffs, there is a small chance we get left out. But it would make the committee look like idiots (but we all know there are lots of idiots on that committee to start with) especially if we go on to win the Rose Bowl.
But first thing first, win next week's game! -
Yeah, but still...dhdawg said:
the true freshman looks like hot garbage thus farRoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
-
That still is a way better OOC than UW's. If we just had some random shit 8-4 type team in our OOC we would have nothing to worry about.LoneStarDawg said:Penn state has an absolutely horseshit OOC, Kent state, Pitt (L), and Temple. How that is not discussed is baffling.
Instead we played possibly the worst P5 team, Idaho, and Portland State. -
Oglala Lakota Nation!!! TRUE???!!!RoadDawg55 said:
Their defense is better and they are deeper. If you think their offense is better, I have some oceanside property in South Dakota to sell you.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Alabama is just as balanced and better.RoadDawg55 said:
It would be pretty devastating.dhdawg said:worst case, if UW wins next week of course, is a rose bowl berth against Michigan. which isn't bad either
It should be obvious to anyone that UW is a top 4 team. No team in the country has as balanced of a team as UW.
We can run, we can throw, we have playmakers, we stop the run, we have a great secondary, and we are well coached. No other team has an offense and defense on UW's level. Both are very good to elite.
Other than Arizona, we have destroyed every team we should have. We score 40+ and we hold them under 21.
Hope this helps. -
Colorado is 9th today. With a win, they stay at 9 or move to 8TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The one valid argument for a Colorado loss is that it boosts Utah a bit.Swaye said:
I'm with boobs. I don't know why anyone would want USC. The committee has Colorado ranked higher therefore it helps us more to beat them. Simple.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The committee likes Colorado more than USC.GrundleStiltzkin said:
A win against SC is enough. A win over Colorado probably requires some style points to be sure.halfbrainmanmolder said:If we play SC next week and win, there is no fucking way we(?) get left out. It is the next best thing to being undefeated when you avenge your only loss. Last I checked, we have only one team left that is still undefeated. We could be even ranked 2nd if we destroy SC next week.
If we play the Buffs, there is a small chance we get left out. But it would make the committee look like idiots (but we all know there are lots of idiots on that committee to start with) especially if we go on to win the Rose Bowl.
But first thing first, win next week's game!
Utah (22) beats Colorado, they may get to 18 or 17
-
they DisagreeRoadDawg55 said:
It would be pretty devastating.dhdawg said:worst case, if UW wins next week of course, is a rose bowl berth against Michigan. which isn't bad either
It should be obvious to anyone that UW is a top 4 team. No team in the country has as balanced of a team as UW.
We can run, we can throw, we have playmakers, we stop the run, we have a great secondary, and we are well coached. No other team has an offense and defense on UW's level. Both are very good to elite.
Other than Arizona, we have destroyed every team we should have. We score 40+ and we hold them under 21.
-
A 3 loss team at number two? That's FS even for Cowherd.Baseman said:
they DisagreeRoadDawg55 said:
It would be pretty devastating.dhdawg said:worst case, if UW wins next week of course, is a rose bowl berth against Michigan. which isn't bad either
It should be obvious to anyone that UW is a top 4 team. No team in the country has as balanced of a team as UW.
We can run, we can throw, we have playmakers, we stop the run, we have a great secondary, and we are well coached. No other team has an offense and defense on UW's level. Both are very good to elite.
Other than Arizona, we have destroyed every team we should have. We score 40+ and we hold them under 21. -
Then die they shall.Meek said:No way the committee members that should support Pac-12 will get us in. Willingham and Haden would rather die than put us in.
-
Fuck oh dear!RoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
Good call Roadie!
Fuck you guys know about as much about ACC football as ACC fans know about the Pac-12.
Clemson was not losing to SC and won't lose to VaTech with something on the line.
Washington, much as I love them, has a shit resume. They've played one good team and looked like they didn't belong on the field. At home.
Still, the playoff will be:
1-Bama
2-Ohio State (non conf champ, lol @ the stupid fucking 'playoff')
3-Clemson
4-Washington
And we are going to get unceremoniously drubbed in ATL after 4 weeks of everyone saying we are a fraud.
YAY! -
PISS OFF DENNISDennis_DeYoung said:
Good call Roadie!RoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
Fuck you guys know about as much about ACC football as ACC fans know about the Pac-12.
Clemson was not losing to SC and won't lose to VaTech with something on the line.
Washington, much as I love them, has a shit resume. They've played one good team and looked like they didn't belong on the field. At home.
Still, the playoff will be:
1-Bama
2-Ohio State (non conf champ, lol @ the stupid fucking 'playoff')
3-Clemson
4-Washington
And we are going to get unceremoniously drubbed in ATL after 4 weeks of everyone saying we are a fraud.
YAY! -
The ACC IS COMPLETE DRECK OUTSIDE OF A MEH LOUISVILLE AND FSU, AND OF COURSE CLUMPSON
-
I've watched a fair amount of Clemson. They know they are better and coast much of the time.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuck oh dear!RoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
Good call Roadie!
Fuck you guys know about as much about ACC football as ACC fans know about the Pac-12.
Clemson was not losing to SC and won't lose to VaTech with something on the line.
Washington, much as I love them, has a shit resume. They've played one good team and looked like they didn't belong on the field. At home.
Still, the playoff will be:
1-Bama
2-Ohio State (non conf champ, lol @ the stupid fucking 'playoff')
3-Clemson
4-Washington
And we are going to get unceremoniously drubbed in ATL after 4 weeks of everyone saying we are a fraud.
YAY!
I didn't know shit about South Carolina except for a recent article about a freshman phenom QB that was obviously a puff piece. I gave them a 25% chance. That doesn't look good with a blowout, but 25% means I thought Clemson had a 81% chance to win.
A loss to Pitt is worse than one to USC. I know you love Clemson, but they haven't played too well (for an 11-1 team) most of the year. And the ACC is fucking horrible. It really is. -
South Carolina is horrible. i just assumed they would give Clemson a game cause they are an sec team.
they beat Umass by 6, beat east carolina by 5, and beat western carolina by 13. they suck -
You nailed it when you said 'Clemson knows they are better and coasts'. I don't think the loss to Pitt is particularly fetching either. It's just a funny reality to watch pots calling kettles blick and ISAFNRC.RoadDawg55 said:
I've watched a fair amount of Clemson. They know they are better and coast much of the time.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuck oh dear!RoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
Good call Roadie!
Fuck you guys know about as much about ACC football as ACC fans know about the Pac-12.
Clemson was not losing to SC and won't lose to VaTech with something on the line.
Washington, much as I love them, has a shit resume. They've played one good team and looked like they didn't belong on the field. At home.
Still, the playoff will be:
1-Bama
2-Ohio State (non conf champ, lol @ the stupid fucking 'playoff')
3-Clemson
4-Washington
And we are going to get unceremoniously drubbed in ATL after 4 weeks of everyone saying we are a fraud.
YAY!
I didn't know shit about South Carolina except for a recent article about a freshman phenom QB that was obviously a puff piece. I gave them a 25% chance. That doesn't look good with a blowout, but 25% means I thought Clemson had a 81% chance to win.
A loss to Pitt is worse than one to USC. I know you love Clemson, but they haven't played too well (for an 11-1 team) most of the year. And the ACC is fucking horrible. It really is.
Washington's best win is... ?? WSU? Stanford? Utah? Lost to a good team in USC. They had an overtime close call with shit-stain Arizona.
Clemson's best win is either Auburn on the road, or FSU on the road. Probably better wins than any of UW's. Obviously beat LVille @ home, but that's sort of like beating Stanford at this point. Their close call at home to NCSU is not worse than the one @ Zona.
So, Clemson has the two best wins, and a worse loss, but the 'close game' is a push. They definitely 'coasted' way more than UW did, but if you are just focusing on the Pitt and NCSU games it would be like focusing on AZ and USC for UW. -
I see your point and agree. Better wins, but a worse loss. I think UW could beat them, but they should be the 3 seed. maybe 2 given they've won their conferenceDennis_DeYoung said:
You nailed it when you said 'Clemson knows they are better and coasts'. I don't think the loss to Pitt is particularly fetching either. It's just a funny reality to watch pots calling kettles blick and ISAFNRC.RoadDawg55 said:
I've watched a fair amount of Clemson. They know they are better and coast much of the time.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuck oh dear!RoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
Good call Roadie!
Fuck you guys know about as much about ACC football as ACC fans know about the Pac-12.
Clemson was not losing to SC and won't lose to VaTech with something on the line.
Washington, much as I love them, has a shit resume. They've played one good team and looked like they didn't belong on the field. At home.
Still, the playoff will be:
1-Bama
2-Ohio State (non conf champ, lol @ the stupid fucking 'playoff')
3-Clemson
4-Washington
And we are going to get unceremoniously drubbed in ATL after 4 weeks of everyone saying we are a fraud.
YAY!
I didn't know shit about South Carolina except for a recent article about a freshman phenom QB that was obviously a puff piece. I gave them a 25% chance. That doesn't look good with a blowout, but 25% means I thought Clemson had a 81% chance to win.
A loss to Pitt is worse than one to USC. I know you love Clemson, but they haven't played too well (for an 11-1 team) most of the year. And the ACC is fucking horrible. It really is.
Washington's best win is... ?? WSU? Stanford? Utah? Lost to a good team in USC. They had an overtime close call with shit-stain Arizona.
Clemson's best win is either Auburn on the road, or FSU on the road. Probably better wins than any of UW's. Obviously beat LVille @ home, but that's sort of like beating Stanford at this point. Their close call at home to NCSU is not worse than the one @ Zona.
So, Clemson has the two best wins, and a worse loss, but the 'close game' is a push. They definitely 'coasted' way more than UW did, but if you are just focusing on the Pitt and NCSU games it would be like focusing on AZ and USC for UW. -
And a loss to Pitt @ home in Pittsburgh (more PSU fans than Pitt at Heinz filed)LoneStarDawg said:Penn state has an absolutely horseshit OOC, Kent state, Pitt (L), and Temple. How that is not discussed is baffling.
-
This is what we get to listen to for a whole week http://es.pn/2fE5JdR
Joey you are flying your homer flag a little too shamefully -
Bama in,
Ohio State in (no scenario moves them from being #2 to out w/ wins versus OU/Michigan/Wisconsin and them being The Ohio State Univ)
Clemson in w/ win in ACC Champ.
Selection committee would LOVE to keep Michigan in mix as there will be people in that room who are thinking if OSU is #2, then Michigan is 2A after the double ot loss. Could they only push them down to #4?
Also think if Penn State wins the Big 10, selection committee doesn't have stones to keep Ohio State in, yet keep Penn State out.
So if we go 12-1 and don't get in, then the lesson for UW is non-conf. schedule matters.
And Larry Scott: You better make a phone call Monday to Texas and OU about joining the conf. to strengthen the image, because right now the national perception is we play no defense, night games that get over at 2:00 am e.s.t that no one east of the State of Utah watches or cares about. -
Our best case scenario is that the committee views conference championships positively and so it puts Clemson and us 2 and 3 behind Bama. Then puts tOSU in at 4 with the rationale that they didn't win a championship game.
Maybe if we blow out the Buff and Clemson only slides by the Gobbler, we can flip to 2 and be guaranteed a spot in PHX.
Honestly, I think it's not a tremendously unlikely scenario, given that the committee may want to show some veneer of commitment to their own criteria regarding conference championships.
Playing Clemson in PHX would obviously be special. -
So you go run your mouth about how you think Clemson will lose in their rivalry game because you read a FUCKING ARTICLE ... you obviously haven't watched the games this year and are busy running your mouth with opinions on shit you don't have a fucking clue about ...RoadDawg55 said:
I've watched a fair amount of Clemson. They know they are better and coast much of the time.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Fuck oh dear!RoadDawg55 said:
I think they will. Maybe even today. South Carolina has a good true freshman QB and Muschamp almost always has a good defense. Rivalry game, Clemson all year. 25% chance of an upset.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Clemson is going to lose irregardless so you are poont is mute
Good call Roadie!
Fuck you guys know about as much about ACC football as ACC fans know about the Pac-12.
Clemson was not losing to SC and won't lose to VaTech with something on the line.
Washington, much as I love them, has a shit resume. They've played one good team and looked like they didn't belong on the field. At home.
Still, the playoff will be:
1-Bama
2-Ohio State (non conf champ, lol @ the stupid fucking 'playoff')
3-Clemson
4-Washington
And we are going to get unceremoniously drubbed in ATL after 4 weeks of everyone saying we are a fraud.
YAY!
I didn't know shit about South Carolina except for a recent article about a freshman phenom QB that was obviously a puff piece. I gave them a 25% chance. That doesn't look good with a blowout, but 25% means I thought Clemson had a 81% chance to win.
A loss to Pitt is worse than one to USC. I know you love Clemson, but they haven't played too well (for an 11-1 team) most of the year. And the ACC is fucking horrible. It really is.
At least when Puppy decides to give his opinions that are just flat out wrong at least he's watched the games and didn't have his meds dialed in ... you in contrast are just a fucking idiot.
