Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job?
PurpleJ
Member Posts: 37,643 
Assuming the expectations are conference titles and national championships....ahem
Do you still think Pete is the right guy for the job? 67 votes
Yes
83%
56 votes
No
16%
11 votes
Comments
-
who else will travel all the way to Seattle?
-
NoI said it last year. I think he isn't the solution. Hope I'm wrong blah blah blah. I think we find out for sure this year. Last year pushed me to 90 percent fuck him. This year he either wins 10 and I will get behind him, or he flails about and then I know he sucks.
-
-
No
This. We find out this year, but I don't currently hold him in high esteem. His offenses have been too shitty for awhile to get me to buy in.Swaye said:I said it last year. I think he isn't the solution. Hope I'm wrong blah blah blah. I think we find out for sure this year. Last year pushed me to 90 percent fuck him. This year he either wins 10 and I will get behind him, or he flails about and then I know he sucks.
-
I'm optimistic about him but also don't have a whole lot to praise him for, so I'll just say this...I think he has a better shot at winning the conference than our last 3 coaches did.
-
Yesbut who would we get that's any better?
-
No
I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.LoneStarDawg said:but who would we get that's any better?
I don't think good coaches would line up for this job. -
YesI'm like 55-45 so I'm much more LIFPO than yes or no. This year will tell us everything we need to know. I'll either be strongly in or strongly out by the time this year is over.
-
BONEM
WARBATPO
WOOF -
NoCersi needs to do what she does to husky stadium now
-
No
Maybe grab that young DJ kid out of Kent State or something....RoadDawg55 said:
I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.LoneStarDawg said:but who would we get that's any better?
I don't think good coaches would line up for this job.
-
No
I admire your faith in the face of evidence to the contrary.dnc said:I'm like 55-45 so I'm much more LIFPO than yes or no. This year will tell us everything we need to know. I'll either be strongly in or strongly out by the time this year is over.
-
YesWe? are mediocre program until proven otherwise. If Pete isn't the guy, it's time for the Big Sky. I don't see the program recovering in any amount of time to hold my interest. Win/win for me.
-
NoThread lacks the why?becausewewere7and6?.gif @GrundleStiltzkin
-
Yes
It's hard. It's hard to poast in this bored day in and day out.PurpleJ said:Thread lacks the
@GrundleStiltzkin -
No
Because we were 7-6 last year?GrundleStiltzkin said:
It's hard. It's hard to poast in this bored day in and day out.PurpleJ said:Thread lacks the
@GrundleStiltzkin -
YesRinse. Repete.
-
I'll be less optimistic the first time I see Lindquist come in on 3rd down and fail to convert while a healthy Jake Browning sits on the bench.
-
No
It's hardRoadDawg55 said:
I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.LoneStarDawg said:but who would we get that's any better?
I don't think good coaches would line up for this job.
The reason you don't fall in love with a mediocre coach like Sark or like Petermen appears to be is the more times you fire the more times you get to hire and get it right. There are not tons of great coaches. Being forced to look for the next one is better than hiring a Ty or even Petermen if he turns out to be like the other Boise losers.
You're right about our program. It won't stop us from getting lucky but it could stop us from keeping a coach worth keeping -
No
Roll Tide!RaceBannon said:
It's hardRoadDawg55 said:
I used to dismiss this as a doog excuse, but we have an unproven, most likely shitty AD, a budget deficit, and a program that has been irrelevant for a long time.LoneStarDawg said:but who would we get that's any better?
I don't think good coaches would line up for this job.
The reason you don't fall in love with a mediocre coach like Sark or like Petermen appears to be is the more times you fire the more times you get to hire and get it right. There are not tons of great coaches. Being forced to look for the next one is better than hiring a Ty or even Petermen if he turns out to be like the other Boise losers.
You're right about our program. It won't stop us from getting lucky but it could stop us from keeping a coach worth keeping
-
YesThere is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
-
Yes
-
No
I'm just curious as to what evidence points to a "yes" answer...WilburHooksHands said:There is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
-
NoWe suck until proven otherwise.
-
No
Off season natty post of the summer so farLoneStarDawg said: -
NoToo many spectacularly terrible decisions and red flags for me to give any vote of confidence. Win now or get the fuck out.
Stanford fake punt. Cyler Miles. 52 pass attempts @ ASU. Oregon 2 minute drill. Being "stubborn with the run" (kill me now).
Unlike with his predecessor though, it isn't a complete surefire dumpster. The physicality, conditioning, and general defense are probably the best they've been in the post-DJ era. -
NoIf the offense is better, the defense will be worse and/or have key guys injured. Or we lose 4 or 5 games by 3 or less an blow out everyone else. Our SRS rating will be high though.
This is Husky Football. We hire shit AD'a who were part of the problem. The majority of the fan base thought Sark was a very good coach. We win sustainability awards.
It's a shit program that has a nice stadium and was relevant 30 years ago. In the 30 years since, how many conference titles has UW been in contention going into the last two weeks of the season? Maybe 3?
I was in denial until Pete's first year. He was so bad that season that it ruined Husky Football for me. Sark was gone and we actually got worse. That preseason was the last time I'll ever doog it up until we win a championship.
I've given up on the program until they win. Give us a fucking championship or get the fuck out. I'm over the mediocrity. -
No Natty cakes for Tommy when they do win it this year then,ThomasFremont said:We suck until proven otherwise.
-
Yes
Recruiting, development, and the ability to put together a real roster. The only outstanding question is offensive coaching and as weve said 1000 times its a giant one.PurpleJ said:
I'm just curious as to what evidence points to a "yes" answer...WilburHooksHands said:There is plenty of evidence to suggest either choice, I just haven't reached my "no" point yet personally.
-
YesI said 3 years from the get go. Still holding onto hope.
Yes I am a doog.
