Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Who Do You Side With...?
Comments
-
I don't like Cruz personally, he is not my kind of candidate. I just answered the questions. But if Cruz is the nominee he gets my votedoogsinparadise said:
Not surprising that a frustrated liberal like yourself would like Trump, but Cruz?RaceBannon said:My hits may be the least surprising. I did go strongly in favor of photo ID to vote in honor of collegdoog
89% Cruz
88% Trump
87% Rubio
82% Rand
80% Carson
78% Jeb
31% Hilary
30% Feeling the Bern
Flip Cruz and Trump and you pretty much have my preference in order
I just want to see the current political world burn -
I'm actually a small government guy ...ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like you love Big Brother.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
But when it comes to my two biggest interests in government, it is economy and security. And when it comes to making sure that our borders are secure and that our citizens are safe, I'm very uncompromising. -
Thinking one case proves there are more cases. This is the generation with all those critical thinking skills I've been hearing about.
-
The I don't have anything to hide argument. CHRIST.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part. -
What if I told you that the invasions into our privacy has produced nothing in terms of thwarting terror attacks or increasing national security?Tequilla said:
I'm actually a small government guy ...ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like you love Big Brother.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
But when it comes to my two biggest interests in government, it is economy and security. And when it comes to making sure that our borders are secure and that our citizens are safe, I'm very uncompromising.
Because that is exactly what has happened.
You can't be a small government guy and support the NSA's massive intrusion into the privacy of American citizens unless you're lying to yourself. -
Fuck o dear.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part. -
Sounds like the hysteria from the media has gotten to you.Tequilla said:
I'm actually a small government guy ...ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like you love Big Brother.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part.
But when it comes to my two biggest interests in government, it is economy and security. And when it comes to making sure that our borders are secure and that our citizens are safe, I'm very uncompromising. -
If you think the NSA even cares a cunt hair about your rights, then you're seriously retarded.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part. -
The whole "I have nothing to hide" is a terrible non-argument, it's a gross infringement of search and seizure.
-
The same arguments against the NSA work remarkably well against gun control
