Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who Do You Side With...?

16791112

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,545 Founders Club

    salemcoog said:

    Thinking one case proves there are more cases. This is the generation with all those critical thinking skills I've been hearing about.

    Patiently waiting for any counterpoint that includes evidence that there are not cases of voter fraud.
    I can't prove God doesn't exist as well.
    And don't you forget it!
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Tequilla said:

    I would never give up freedoms ... that's insane.

    And I don't at all buy that giving law enforcement the opportunity to protect is a sacrificing of liberties if done correctly. Knowing all of my conversations, what I send by email, etc., is insane and doesn't need to happen without a warrant. Cross checking my calls against other numbers, etc. in the form of data I don't find as a problem.

    Some may have a problem with people even knowing who they are talking to. I don't. Some may hate airport security. I can live with it. Some things are inconveniences but they are far from deal breakers to me.

    Except it's not being done correctly.

    Other than that, I'm glad you draw the line at not sacrificing ALL of your freedoms.

    Wake up, sheeple.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379

    I'm still clinging to my guns and religion.

    image
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,139 Standard Supporter
    I took it again and feel the Bern was 93% again, Hills was 85 or something and now Jebediah was up to 60. Huckabee wasn't even near what he was the first time.

    It said something like center left authoritarian.

    To really d be as accurate as possible one should probably do all 10-15 questions from each section and slide the importance scale if applicable. I only did three on some and the full 12 or so on others and I forgot to check the importance scale half the time.
  • Woof
    Woof Member Posts: 770
    salemcoog said:

    Thinking one case proves there are more cases. This is the generation with all those critical thinking skills I've been hearing about.

    Patiently waiting for any counterpoint that includes evidence that there are not cases of voter fraud.
    From a guy who studies voter fraud:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/

    Our apathetic citizenry can barely vote once, let alone fraudulently register and vote multiple times. This shouldn't be too hard to figure out. Democrats want to make it as easy as possible for people to register and vote so they can turn out the lazy and unemployed. Republicans want to suppress the vote to prevent these same people from voting against them. Screw all of our failed leaders for letting it get to this point (similar to what flea said).
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Woof said:

    salemcoog said:

    Thinking one case proves there are more cases. This is the generation with all those critical thinking skills I've been hearing about.

    Patiently waiting for any counterpoint that includes evidence that there are not cases of voter fraud.
    From a guy who studies voter fraud:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/

    Our apathetic citizenry can barely vote once, let alone fraudulently register and vote multiple times. This shouldn't be too hard to figure out. Democrats want to make it as easy as possible for people to register and vote so they can turn out the lazy and unemployed. Republicans want to suppress the vote to prevent these same people from voting against them. Screw all of our failed leaders for letting it get to this point (similar to what flea said).
    Their talking point from this will be "31 cases! We told you it was an epidemic!".
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989

    Lol at the ~80% of Libertarians against mandatory vaccinations.

    I get this argument. But think about it...violence and coersion aren't the only means of influencing people to do something. Easily more than 80% of libertarians believe that children should be vaccinated.
    I believe kids should get vaccinated because kids, if not coat-hangered in the third trimester, should be given a chance to live. I don't need the fucking government to tell me that.

    But I do need the fucking government to make all those dumbfucks who SHOULD have coathangered their babies and don't like their kids living longer to get theirs vaccinated so I"m not just paying for their WIC program AND their healthcare more than absolutely necessary.

    That's the wrong direction, though. Your main issue should be with WIC and Medicaid, and by endorsing mandatory vaccinations you are indirectly supporting those social programs.
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    Tequilla said:


    That being said, I've got no problem sacrificing some rights for greater security.

    Go ahead and sacrifice them, then. That's fine. But if you want to make me sacrifice mine, you're an asshole.